Jump to content
wildcard

Does O's management want to win in Sept?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t see how we will improve the pitching enough to be anywhere close to .500.    .400 would be an achievement.   

Agree with this. Even if they're willing to start the service time clocks on Mountcastle, Hays, etc. next year there's no immediate pitching help on the way. I think 2021 is the year they shoot for .500. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep.  That was what I was telling folks when they said this year's team was somehow going to lose more than last year's team. 

It's not over 'til it's over.  They have to go at least 3-22 (.120) to beat last year's team.  The 2002 Orioles finished 4-32 (.111).

But, yea, the plexiglass principle.  A team that strongly declines in one year tends to improve the next.  And I think it was 1942 (Phillies) the last time a team failed to win 50 in consecutive seasons. I'm guessing the '42 Phillies had total revenues lower than the MLB minimum salary today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's not over 'til it's over.  They have to go at least 3-22 (.120) to beat last year's team.  The 2002 Orioles finished 4-32 (.111).

But, yea, the plexiglass principle.  A team that strongly declines in one year tends to improve the next.  And I think it was 1942 (Phillies) the last time a team failed to win 50 in consecutive seasons. I'm guessing the '42 Phillies had total revenues lower than the MLB minimum salary today.

I'm looking at 2-23 to not be worse.  Pretty sure that's doable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dipper9 said:

Well, Elias still has Davis on the roster, so he is "kinda" influencing the on field results.  Now Hyde, to his credit, is not playing him, so I'll give you that Hyde has more influence on wins than Elias, but Elias is not completely out of the picture.

They gonna have 40 guys on the bench this September my good buddy? If not Chris Davis means zero. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, El Gordo said:

What's the difference between the # 1 and #3 picks? Worth demoralizing the players?

Harper v.  Machado

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So I'm not select?  😧

Quote

USDA Prime, Choice or Select which is the order of grade from the highest to lowest.

You are definitely Select.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Mix in some butter, salt and pepper, even a little old bay, and damn good. :)

You got that right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

You got that right.

Garlic too! Actually no: I thought you were talking about steak for some reason (Prime, Select, etc.).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/3/2019 at 11:23 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

 

The Orioles are on pace for a nearly -300 run differential. To get to .500 they'd need to make up 300 runs.  That's lowering the team ERA by 1.00 run/game, while also scoring 1.00 run/game more than they have this year.  One half of that would be a pretty big leap.  30 wins is on the outside edge of what's plausible.  Only a small handful of teams have ever improved by 30 games in one season.  

The two teams known to history as "miracle" teams (the 1914 Braves and the '69 Mets) improved by less than 30 games.  The '12 Orioles only improved by 24 wins.  The '89 Orioles improved by 33, and I'm pretty sure that's one of the top three or five totals in history.

Calling people trolls when they're skeptical that the '20 Orioles will make an historic leap forward is ludicrous.

I don't disagree with the overall point that skepticism about the team playing .500 next year is far from being a troll. I just want to point out that, as I'm sure you know, the relation between W/L record and run-differential isn't categorical. Even if one looks only at this season's standings, the Brewers are 4 W's over .500 with a -38 run-differential (RD) and the Phillies are a remarkable +7 W's with -4 RD; they are only 4 and 2.5 games out of WC status, respectively.

Even less linear is the fact that the Brewers' W/L is only a 1/2-game worse than the Diamondbacks despite being 124 runs behind in RD (-38 vs. +76). And the Phillies are 2.5 games up on the Mets despite being -24 RD worse. In the same division, the Nats are a probably insurmountable 6.5 games behind the Braves despite a +22 RD superiority.

Our cherished O's of 2012 went 93-69 despite scoring only SEVEN runs more than they gave up, which is even more impressive than the scrappy Why-Not? team of 1989, which won six less games (87-75) with a 15-run better RD (+22).

There is, of course, a strong correlation between RD and W/L overall, but the number of exceptions is not insignificant--and it happens every season. It would be very unlikely, but not really too amazing, that is, if next year's Orioles somehow fall far short of the zero RD you posited and still put up a W/L record that approaches .500.

At the same time, I'm not going to call anyone a troll just because that fact doesn't inspire him or her to a fine madness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen our pitching staff?  Hard to win >33% of games with that. 

We’ve got some good things going though. The lineup really came on. The bullpen is pitching much better. Givens has a 2.87 ERA his last 30. Mountcastle had a big AAA season. 

Grow the bats. Buy the arms. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/2/2019 at 10:08 AM, weams said:

Nope. They will play their hearts out. All of them. And Elias is currently uninvolved. 

I think the last sentence is a little naive. I think there is a unified plan between Hyde and Elias. I don't think the players are tanking and I don't think Hyde manages to lose games. But uninvolved I find it hard to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, El Gordo said:

What's the difference between the # 1 and #3 picks? Worth demoralizing the players?

From the 1965 to 2012 draft its about a 9 WAR deference over a career in terms of the average and about 10 WAR difference over a career in terms of the median value. From 1990 to 2012 its about 16 and 12.5 respectively. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I think MLB’s proposal to start playing games in May is much too aggressive, for two reasons: 1.     During the season players, and others at MLB games who work in close proximity to the players or to one another, should be tested frequently (I would say daily, but that may be not be necessary) for the virus. I don’t think the public would, or should, stand for MLB sucking up large numbers of tests until such time as those tests are in sufficient supply that MLB’s need for them does not make tests unavailable to health care workers, those with symptoms, and large swaths of the public.   2.     I don’t think it would be appropriate to start playing baseball games while the number of hospitalizations and deaths from the virus remains high, and while large portions of the population are ordered or advised to stay at home.   If you take both these limitations seriously, when could the 2020 season start? I think there are two answers. The first is that it’s later than May. The second is that nobody knows. That says to me that any planning for the 2020 season should look to a summer start date – I would estimate mid-August. The second is that whatever plan is put together should be flexible, so that it can be altered without creating a new mess. Those things tell me that a regular but abbreviated schedule of games is not likely to work. There is a minimum of games that need to played before you can say there’s been a meaningful season with division champions and wild card qualifiers. I would put that number at 75. I don’t want to see a baseball season last into November, with playoffs nearing Christmas. I would rather see a season that concludes somewhere around the normal time. I don’t think it’s realistic to have fans at these games until there has been either virtually universal inoculation with a vaccine for the virus or something very close to herd immunity, neither of which is likely to occur in this calendar year. Without some dramatic change that would protect fans from passing the virus around, I think it would be foolish of MLB – and in the long run harmful to the game – to bring together thousands of spectators and knowingly expose them to a risk of disease and death. I think MLB would be better off in the long run if it did something much more modest this season and focused on maximizing the chances of having a normal 2021 season. I recognize that the Commissioner and many team owners seem incapable of taking a long-range view of anything where that view will deprive them of short-term revenues (or impose short-term costs), but I can't worry about that. Here, then, is a modest proposal for MLB in 2020. (I’ve put in some details, not because they’re important, but because they helped me think through the feasibility of the proposal.) I’ll note at the outset that I don’t like my proposal either. I would love to see a season that looks as much like those of the past as possible. I just think it’s a bad idea under the circumstances as I expect them to exist over the next few months. On August 17, MLB teams would begin “summer training,” at their spring training locations (or elsewhere if they choose), limited to 40 roster players and 15 coaches, trainers, and other non-playing personnel. Beginning on August 28, MLB would take over four, or more, spring training sites in Arizona. All players would stay in designated hotels, with one or more designated for quarantined players. (It appears that the hot, dry, high-ultraviolet radiation environment might inhibit the spread of the virus.) On August 31, MLB teams would begin a 32-team tournament. Teams in each league would be seeded 1 through 15, based on their winning percentage (or their run differentials) in 2019. There would AL and NL sides of the draw, so that all games would be intraleague until the championship. Last season’s winners of the Japanese Pacific and Central League pennants, the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks and Yomiuri Giants, would be invited to be the 16th team in each draw. If they decline, the 16th seeds would be Columbus and Sacramento, the 2019 International and Pacific Coast League champs. If that’s impractical, the top seeds would get byes in the first round, and would play each other in a round of exhibition games while the other teams are playing the initial round.   The opening round of 16 (or 15) series, second round of eight series, and league semifinals of four series would be best two-out-of-three. Each league championship series would be best three-out-of-five, and the championship would be best four-out-of-seven. The losing teams in each round also would play best two-out-of-three series, but they would not be eligible for the championship. There would be a day off after the conclusion of each series next round. The maximum number of games played by any team would be 21, and with off-days the maximum time to determine a tournament winner would be 25 days, in the absence of rainouts, tornados, etc. MLB’s arrangements with TV networks would emphasize staggering the start times of games so that a viewer could see all or almost of the action, and that might require adding two or three days to the initial rounds. We're talking about roughly four weeks of baseball, with games played almost every day. No fans would be permitted. Each team would designate 25 players, plus up to 15 non-playing personnel, to be present for the game. I am guessing it takes another 25 persons (umpires, batkids, ballkids, security, etc.) to play each game, plus another 25 to broadcast it on TV and radio. That’s 130 persons in the stadium for each game. On the day of each game, those 130 would be tested. A player who tests positive would be barred from playing on that day and quarantined for 14 days, or whatever the appropriate time is deemed to be, after which he would be permitted to return. His place could be taken by anyone who was on the 40-man summer training roster. Something like that would give us an interesting month of baseball in a way that would not make MLB look like greedy pigs (even if that’s what many of them are) who want to salvage as much revenue in 2020 as they can without regard for the health of the players and the public.    
    • From Roch's interview with Cal posted today: https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/04/ripken-on-twitter-account-strike-out-hunger-campaign-and-more.html
    • Were I running the show, I'd test all players for coronavirus upon reporting to Arizona and at semi-regular intervals. If they test positive, they go on the IL and can't be activated until they test negative. Obviously that's not a complete policy, but it's the jist of what I think they should do if they decide to go forward with this
    • I was 8 and yes, life was good.
    • ALL of this post! Especially the bolded part. It would be better than nothing. It would be baseball for fans to watch and for players to play. It would be weird but these are unprecedentedly weird times.
    • I was 11 and life was very good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...