Jump to content
wildcard

Does O's management want to win in Sept?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t see how we will improve the pitching enough to be anywhere close to .500.    .400 would be an achievement.   

Agree with this. Even if they're willing to start the service time clocks on Mountcastle, Hays, etc. next year there's no immediate pitching help on the way. I think 2021 is the year they shoot for .500. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep.  That was what I was telling folks when they said this year's team was somehow going to lose more than last year's team. 

It's not over 'til it's over.  They have to go at least 3-22 (.120) to beat last year's team.  The 2002 Orioles finished 4-32 (.111).

But, yea, the plexiglass principle.  A team that strongly declines in one year tends to improve the next.  And I think it was 1942 (Phillies) the last time a team failed to win 50 in consecutive seasons. I'm guessing the '42 Phillies had total revenues lower than the MLB minimum salary today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's not over 'til it's over.  They have to go at least 3-22 (.120) to beat last year's team.  The 2002 Orioles finished 4-32 (.111).

But, yea, the plexiglass principle.  A team that strongly declines in one year tends to improve the next.  And I think it was 1942 (Phillies) the last time a team failed to win 50 in consecutive seasons. I'm guessing the '42 Phillies had total revenues lower than the MLB minimum salary today.

I'm looking at 2-23 to not be worse.  Pretty sure that's doable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dipper9 said:

Well, Elias still has Davis on the roster, so he is "kinda" influencing the on field results.  Now Hyde, to his credit, is not playing him, so I'll give you that Hyde has more influence on wins than Elias, but Elias is not completely out of the picture.

They gonna have 40 guys on the bench this September my good buddy? If not Chris Davis means zero. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, El Gordo said:

What's the difference between the # 1 and #3 picks? Worth demoralizing the players?

Harper v.  Machado

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So I'm not select?  😧

Quote

USDA Prime, Choice or Select which is the order of grade from the highest to lowest.

You are definitely Select.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Mix in some butter, salt and pepper, even a little old bay, and damn good. :)

You got that right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

You got that right.

Garlic too! Actually no: I thought you were talking about steak for some reason (Prime, Select, etc.).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/3/2019 at 11:23 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

 

The Orioles are on pace for a nearly -300 run differential. To get to .500 they'd need to make up 300 runs.  That's lowering the team ERA by 1.00 run/game, while also scoring 1.00 run/game more than they have this year.  One half of that would be a pretty big leap.  30 wins is on the outside edge of what's plausible.  Only a small handful of teams have ever improved by 30 games in one season.  

The two teams known to history as "miracle" teams (the 1914 Braves and the '69 Mets) improved by less than 30 games.  The '12 Orioles only improved by 24 wins.  The '89 Orioles improved by 33, and I'm pretty sure that's one of the top three or five totals in history.

Calling people trolls when they're skeptical that the '20 Orioles will make an historic leap forward is ludicrous.

I don't disagree with the overall point that skepticism about the team playing .500 next year is far from being a troll. I just want to point out that, as I'm sure you know, the relation between W/L record and run-differential isn't categorical. Even if one looks only at this season's standings, the Brewers are 4 W's over .500 with a -38 run-differential (RD) and the Phillies are a remarkable +7 W's with -4 RD; they are only 4 and 2.5 games out of WC status, respectively.

Even less linear is the fact that the Brewers' W/L is only a 1/2-game worse than the Diamondbacks despite being 124 runs behind in RD (-38 vs. +76). And the Phillies are 2.5 games up on the Mets despite being -24 RD worse. In the same division, the Nats are a probably insurmountable 6.5 games behind the Braves despite a +22 RD superiority.

Our cherished O's of 2012 went 93-69 despite scoring only SEVEN runs more than they gave up, which is even more impressive than the scrappy Why-Not? team of 1989, which won six less games (87-75) with a 15-run better RD (+22).

There is, of course, a strong correlation between RD and W/L overall, but the number of exceptions is not insignificant--and it happens every season. It would be very unlikely, but not really too amazing, that is, if next year's Orioles somehow fall far short of the zero RD you posited and still put up a W/L record that approaches .500.

At the same time, I'm not going to call anyone a troll just because that fact doesn't inspire him or her to a fine madness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen our pitching staff?  Hard to win >33% of games with that. 

We’ve got some good things going though. The lineup really came on. The bullpen is pitching much better. Givens has a 2.87 ERA his last 30. Mountcastle had a big AAA season. 

Grow the bats. Buy the arms. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/2/2019 at 10:08 AM, weams said:

Nope. They will play their hearts out. All of them. And Elias is currently uninvolved. 

I think the last sentence is a little naive. I think there is a unified plan between Hyde and Elias. I don't think the players are tanking and I don't think Hyde manages to lose games. But uninvolved I find it hard to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, El Gordo said:

What's the difference between the # 1 and #3 picks? Worth demoralizing the players?

From the 1965 to 2012 draft its about a 9 WAR deference over a career in terms of the average and about 10 WAR difference over a career in terms of the median value. From 1990 to 2012 its about 16 and 12.5 respectively. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I guess it's at least good that we got to "scout" him a bit on video and through instructional camp. At least we have a sense that he likely didn't really let himself go during all of this down time. So that's good. But is this a type that Elias targeted for a reason, or is it a live arm that Elias took as a way to dump salary? His comments indicate the former, but we really won't know until they get to playing for real in 2021.
    • I honestly feel like even this board, which has a lot of people who know a lot more about baseball than me, falls into the sentimental trap. I think that's part of being a fan, so I kind of support it to be honest. But I think this poster is right to point out that Elias just isn't playing that game. He's not blowing smoke, except for the quality of the guys we got back. Hopefully that's all true.
    • The thing is, we are starting to see signs that they are REALLY concerned, even about "small" amounts of money.   They would have had to pay $500K if they declined Iglesias's option, they got out of it for free this way.   In addition, we heard talk that coaching moves were at least partly due to financial reasons.   And that probably was under a million too. So we are seeing signs that not only are they concerned about money, but there are POSSIBLE indications they are so concerned that "trivial" amounds like half a million might be influencing decisions.   Now that doesn't square with tendering Mancini.   But maybe they felt the PR hit would just be too much if they didn't.   It would get rid of any plausible deniability that money wasn't the #1 factor... for Iglesias they can talk up Stallings and Pinto, for the coaching situation they can claim it is based on what coaches they really wanted.   So we can look at those moves and see indications that saving even small amounts of money has become an overriding priority, but we can't prove it.   Non-tendering a guy coming off 5 months of chemotherapy would be about absolutely nothing but money and would be such a bad look that they couldn't get away with it.
    • I am also betting that Elias was a big fan of not pitching the guys and instead hitting them with guided instruction.
    • Anyone find it's interesting that the Angels never pitched their 2019 draft picks after signing them that year but now have traded away their 5th, 6th, and 8th round selections to the Orioles. I'm guessing Elias was a big fan of their draft.
    • Here's one scouting report of him from BA "89-91 mph fringe-average fastball plays up because of his plus control and advanced command. He also has shown he can throw his average slider and average curveball for strikes as well. He will flip in a below-average change regularly to keep hitters guessing. Stallings doesn’t have enough stuff to miss even SEC bats, but he knows how to pitch in traffic and he is quite steady and reliable—he finished the seventh inning in nine of his 15 starts as of late May."  I did read that he tunnels his pitches well and has a good feel for pitching. Saying that, he sounds like a guy that needs to prove it in pro ball before getting too excited. While I could easily move him into the back end of the list and take off Nevin, for now I'll say he's just off my list.
    • On November 16, 2018, Mike Elias was hired by the Baltimore Orioles as Executive Vice-President and General Manager. After allowing for the previous administration's 2018 player trades and the ensuing player declarations of free agency, Elias inherited a minimum 2019 opening day player payroll (ODP) of about $61 million(M). The O's ODP in 2018 had been $154.5M. Elias's ODP for 2019 was, in fact, just over $82M. Adjusted for a 162 game season, his ODP for 2020 was just under $63M. For those who want to play GM, I am presenting my current projected ODP for the start of the 2021 season. The O's will have pay obligations for all players on the 40 man roster, but I'm dealing only with the "active" roster (I'm assuming a 26 player limit). To be on this list, the player must be under contract or under team control. The players listed on the chart below are my current guesses based on the above requirement and transactions to date. I'll update the chart as the off-season proceeds and/or my magic 8-ball results change (all help appreciated). Salaries are displayed as rounded to the nearest $10k, but the total is accurate to 2 decimal places. Projections for those under contract are from authoritative media sources or the Cots Baseball Prospectus Compensation Website - https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/al-east/baltimore-orioles/ Estimated arbitration salaries are the midpoint projections of Matt Swartz at the MLB Trade Rumors site - https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2018/10/mlb-arbitration-salaries-2019.html The 2021 MLB minimum salary is $570,500.  I provide this information so that we can make accurate and useful comparisons to the opening day payrolls of the Orioles in previous years, other MLB teams and the totals for Major League Baseball. As with virtually all team opening day payroll tabulations on the web, my total payroll figure does not reflect any deductions for deferred salaries or additions for set-asides for deferrals from previous years (as required by Article XVI of the CBA). So, please, let's dispense with the squabbling over the "accounting" for salary deferrals. I have noted the 2021 contract deferrals in the right-most column of the below chart. Status   PLAYER POS   2021 SALARY       DEFERRED                ($ Million)        ($ Million)                 P   Chance Sisco C   $0.59     C   Pedro Severino C   $1.83                     C   Chris Davis 1B/DH   $23.00          $6.00 A   Trey Mancini DH/1B/OF   $4.80                     C   Yolmer Sánchez 2B   $1.00                     P   Ramôn Urias SS   $0.57                     P   Rio Ruiz 3B   $0.59                     P   Austin Hays OF   $0.57     A   Anthony Santander OF                    $2.13     P   Ryan Mountcastle OF/1B                    $0.57     P   Cedric Mullins OF   $0.58                     P   Richie Martin UT   $0.57     C   Pat Valaika UT   $0.88                     C   Alex Cobb SP   $15.00           $4.50 P   John Means SP   $0.80     P   Keegan Akin SP   $0.57     P   Dean Kremer SP   $0.57     P   Bruce Zimmerman SP   $0.57                     C   Shawn Armstrong RP   $0.83     P   Paul Fry RP   $0.70     P   Hunter Harvey RP   $0.58     P   Tanner Scott RP   $0.60     P   Travis Lakins Sr. RP   $0.60     P   Dillon Tate RP   $0.58     P   César Valdez RP   $0.58     P   Isaac Mattson RP   $0.57                         Total     $60.21         $10.50                     A = Arbitration Projection               C = Contract               P =  Pre-Arbitration                                       
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...