Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TommyPickles

John Means 2019 vs. Justin Verlander 2006 ROY Season

Recommended Posts

I know Means is probably not going to win Rookie of the Year.  But take a look at how his numbers this year (so far) stack up against one of the other recent AL starters to win the award, Justin Verlander in 2006:

rWAR:

Means- 4.1

Verlander- 4.0

ERA:

Means- 3.47

Verlander- 3.63

ERA+:

Means- 136

Verlander- 125

WHIP:

Means- 1.114

Verlander- 1.328

IP:

Verlander- 186.0 (30 G, 30 GS)

Means- 137.1 (28 G, 24 GS)

 

Now, Verlander had a sexier record and the 2006 Tigers did make it all the way to the World Series... but still, when you look at their numbers side by side, Means has definitely put together a ROY-type season.

 

Edited by TommyPickles
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Which hyped draft pick is going to win AL ROY?

I should have said hyped prospect.  🙄

They'd give it to Vlad Jr. if they could.  Practically had already given it to him before the season started.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yordan Álvarez is the current favorite for RoY, but Means keeps himself in the top tier.   Verlander was a #2 overall pick (SD took Matt Bush 1-1).   Means is off to a much better start to his career than many of us thought possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FIrst time I saw Verlander pitch, it was clear he was going to be great.  Means has been more of a slow reveal.    But he’s been very impressive, and he seems really driven to keep getting better.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

- I don't think you should discount 50 innings difference.

- Verlander is a different type of pitcher.  His strikeout rate was low as a rookie, but over the subsequent couple years he changed something (maybe switching from a sinker to a four seam?) and became more of a prototypical power starter in the same family as a Clemens or a Halladay or Mike Scott or a hundred others.  That's not John Means.

- Most pitchers with below-average strikeout rates fade away pretty quickly.  Almost every HOF starter began life with a better-than-average K rate, most well above average.  K rate is basically a pitcher's margin.  Most lose it over time and eventually get a point where they're not viable anymore.  Verlander's early career switch made him an exception.  We'll see what happens with Means.

- Verlander's fastball has 5 mph on Means, and he's 36.  It's a little astonishing that he throws about as hard at this point in his career as he did as a rookie.  If Means is a normal pitcher he'll have lost 3-5 mph on his 90 mph fastball in a decade.

I hope Means wins the ROY, he's a great story.  But we should be happy if he ends up with a third of Verlander's career.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

- I don't think you should discount 50 innings difference.

- Verlander is a different type of pitcher.  His strikeout rate was low as a rookie, but over the subsequent couple years he changed something (maybe switching from a sinker to a four seam?) and became more of a prototypical power starter in the same family as a Clemens or a Halladay or Mike Scott or a hundred others.  That's not John Means.

- Most pitchers with below-average strikeout rates fade away pretty quickly.  Almost every HOF starter began life with a better-than-average K rate, most well above average.  K rate is basically a pitcher's margin.  Most lose it over time and eventually get a point where they're not viable anymore.  Verlander's early career switch made him an exception.  We'll see what happens with Means.

- Verlander's fastball has 5 mph on Means, and he's 36.  It's a little astonishing that he throws about as hard at this point in his career as he did as a rookie.  If Means is a normal pitcher he'll have lost 3-5 mph on his 90 mph fastball in a decade.

I hope Means wins the ROY, he's a great story.  But we should be happy if he ends up with a third of Verlander's career.

giphy.gif

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How did we ever survive without GIFs and Memes, lol?

I like Means, he's had a nice year.  I hope he can sustain it next season and beyond, but we'll see.  Comparing him to Verlander just isn't a good comp, as has been pointed out.  I'm trying to think of comps for him and I'm struggling.  Jamie Moyer, maybe?  Although Moyer didn't start to pitch really well into his mid-30's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I go on my quest to prove Richie Martin will one day be inducted into Cooperstown... here are some other ROY starters vaguely similar to John Means:

- Michael Fulmer, 2016.  11-7, 139 ERA+.  Currently out for the year with TJ surgery.  24-31, 3.81 for his career.
- Dontrelle Willie, 2003.  14-6, 127 ERA+ in 27 starts.  58-63 rest of his career, 22-10, 2nd in 2005 Cy Young.
- Pat Zachry, 1976, 14-7, 128 ERA+ in 28 starts.  55-60, 98 ERA+ rest of career.
- John Montefusco, 1975, 15-9, 133 ERA+ in 34 starts.  72-72, 100 ERA plus in 10 more years.
- John Matlack, 1972, 15-10, 145 ERA+ in 32 starts.  110-113, with 112 ERA+ rest of career.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Are you saying that this season could land Means a large busted supermodel?

Damn, I totally read that wrong.

3 minutes ago, esmd said:

How did we ever survive without GIFs and Memes, lol?

I like Means, he's had a nice year.  I hope he can sustain it next season and beyond, but we'll see.  Comparing him to Verlander just isn't a good comp, as has been pointed out.  I'm trying to think of comps for him and I'm struggling.  Jamie Moyer, maybe?  Although Moyer didn't start to pitch really well into his mid-30's.

It's not a good comp from a stuff perspective.  But from a stats perspective it's an interesting look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • The latest mock from Jonathan Mayo... https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-mock-draft-june-3?t=mlb-pipeline-coverage    
    • I'll be back because...well, I love baseball.  I love the Orioles.  I really can't imagine MLB being played and not paying attention on some dumb principle that I have against the players and the owners because they're both spoiled assholes.  You can't get mad at water for being wet.   That said... God #@$%ING DAMMIT.  @#%& every last one of them.  MLB just...never gets it right.  The most painful thing in all of this is that they had a chance to lead.  They had a chance to be the first pro sports league to get it together this summer, to come up with a plan to get back to playing and be the first ones on stage Nascar doesn't count, you can't prove me wrong with NO OTHER COMPETITION.  MLB, the sport with the oldest, fart-knockingist fanbase.  MLB, the sport that always seems to lag behind other sports in...just about everything.  MLB, the sport with the dumbest marketing where they try SO HARD TO BE COOL AND RELEVANT.  They had such a prime opportunity to be front stage and center.  No NBA, no NFL and no NHL.  They had an opportunity to be leaders, to show the other leagues how it's done and the opportunity for starved sports fan to see what a great game it can be.  THEY HAD A CHANCE TO HAVE A COMPLETELY CAPTIVE AUDIENCE. And they blew it.   The NBA made it back first, which is not surprising.  In the NBA, you get players that make a metric $%#*ton of money and are also hyper aware and concerned with defining their legacy.  LeBron James is chomping at the bit to get back on the court because he knows this might be the best/last time he can contend for a title and if he wins it, it'd add to his legacy.  You get a guy like Giannis who is obsessed with knocking him off.  Meanwhile, in the MLB you get guys like Snell and Harper who are sitting around bitching about money.  You get the feeling that if someone told Harper this year he would bat .400 but would have to play for free to do it, he wouldn't think twice about sitting out instead of doing something that hasn't been done since 1941 and might not ever happen again.  If someone told Snell he could break Bob Gibson's ERA record for a season or strike out 384 batters this year but not make any money doing so, he'd flip you the bird and sit around and play video games.  World Series?  Forget it, they would just view it as extra work.  I think LeBron would play for free the rest of this summer if he thought he had a chance at another title. I'm not sure where the NHL is in regards to restarting their season because it's...the NHL.  But it wouldn't surprise me if they got their act together and figured out a way to finish, it certainly looks like they're trying harder. And you know the NFL is going to play come hell or high water.  The NFL will not miss a week.  They will start on time.  Because they all know there's too much on the line and that by the end of this summer that people will look to their league as something that can bring people together and help them heal.  People will go ballistic if the NFL start date gets pushed back or if games are missed.  But baseball not happening is seemingly being met with apathy from the general sports fanbase.   @#$% you, MLB.  I'm not saying @#$% you forever, but for right now in this very moment, @#$% you.  @#$% you for being so far behind in everything.  @#$% you for being the last sport to make a statement on George Floyd, only doing so because people noticed you didn't and they called you out on it.  @#$% you players, @#$% you owners, @#$% you all.  @#$% you for not seizing a golden opportunity when you had one because you can't see past your stupid @#$%ing paychecks and your dumbass collective bargaining agreement.  @#$% you for not being able to put your differences aside to be able to play in a time where your fellow countrymen would love nothing more than to watch a game and forget about a pandemic and civil unrest.  @#$% you for not being there when we actually needed you.
    • This came up on my suggestions. Pretty good cover by some youngsters.  
    • Scores high as being personable and well spoken!   Was also interesting during the “Texas History Quiz”, when he and Millar were asked to name one of the seven Texas born Hall of Famers,  he quickly answered “ Nolan Ryan” (natch) but when neither he nor Millar came up with a second quickly, Chris Rose read the rest.   Frank Robinson was one of them, to which Lacy commented  “ I did not realize Frank Robinson was born in Texas”. (Almost like .... how did I miss that when studying up on the Orioles.... 🤔!)
    • This brings up a definitional question... is a five tool guy someone who is outstanding in each area or someone who is average-or-better (at MLB level). The latter may be more how it’s used for prospect evaluation, whereas the former is more from a historical look-back. 
    • Yes, but I would hardly call it a stadium. I can't believe that pro players played there. Its small for legion ball.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...