Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Aglets

Game 7: Ravens @ Seahawks

Who wins?  

7 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Who you got?


  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/20/2019 at 20:25

Recommended Posts

Just now, Elbren said:

With the QB and RB they have, they should be doing that 90% of the time anyway.  Especially when you walk into a game w/ Snead and Boykin as your top 2 receivers.

And it's pouring out, and your best-hands receiver decided to put Crisco on his gloves today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

WTF, Andrews is absolutely awful today! Like he should got o the bench and let Hayden Hurst play bad.

It amazes me that so few people question Hayden Hursts' non-involvement in this offense.  First round pick and he only has 18 targets on the seasons.  He's another high round pick that spends games sitting on the bench with absolutely no explanation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really impressed with Lamars leadership turning the TE back on that one play when he gets in motion too quick.  Shows knowing the play and the importance of the motion.

Yelling at Skura and then patting him on the head like its okay I got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Elbren said:

It amazes me that so few people question Hayden Hursts' non-involvement in this offense.  First round pick and he only has 18 targets on the seasons.  He's another high round pick that spends games sitting on the bench with absolutely no explanation.

He showed good hands earlier in the game. It seems that Boyle has replace Andrews right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jackson and Tucker... Ravens offense!!

What a great drive by Jackson. Almost single handily willed that drive from the 5 yard line for the giomme FG to go up by 10 with 4 to go! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tony-OH said:

Jackson and Tucker... Ravens offense!!

What a great drive by Jackson. Almost single handily willed that drive from the 5 yard line for the giomme FG to go up by 10 with 4 to go! 

I'm a little mixed on this.  Happy they scored, but it's a little ridiculous that, despite the weather, limited personal on the field and inability in the passing game today, they would still rather look to pass the ball or expect Lamar to "do something special" w/ his feet rather than hand the ball off to Ingram.

Game is almost over and he still only has 12 touches.  Why did we sign this guy if we're not going to include him in the offense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • There will be many new norms learned from this by businesses.  I was reading about how workflows have streamlined in some industries because they’ve been forced to move everything between depts electronically. The article was specifically about tv show production (writers, producers, editors, graphics, animators, etc). It noted how much cheaper and time efficient things are now without the need for physical space. 
    • I think most O’s fans would like that option. There is a reason though that they haven’t yet gone that route; it’s not as profitable as the current situation.  It also would make situations like this even more economically devastating because they would lose all of their subscriber money. At least with cable they diversify by getting money from subscribers that stay on despite no sports.    This could go the other way too, where many people cancel Cable because there is no baseball and cable gets to see how many people really were only having cable for the baseball.  But will the casual fan realize they can live without it and not miss it. To be honest, it’s not really at the forefront of my mind these days. I’ve kind of just moved on to other things to occupy my time. Easier to do too when the O’s are going to be terrible too. 
    • So, it's Matrix Baseball and you are "the one"...
    • I was a big APBA guy.    Managed to play 64 games of the 1969 season for the entire AL one summer when all my friends seemed to be away.     I remember almost all the stats were very close to reality but for some reason Reggie Smith had about 25 homers after 64 games.   (In reality, he hit 25 homers over the full season.)   I think his card was on steroids!    Actually, there was nothing on his card that would lead to that kind of result, the dice just kept rolling in his favor.      
    • Or if they go bankrupt new owners could offer streaming services.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...