Jump to content
weams

MLB will be going to a three-batter minimum rule in 2020 that should make it especially difficult for lefties who struggle versus righties to find work.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Number5 said:

There are reasons for all of them.  A lefty stepping more than 45 degrees and throwing to first is very unfair.  Coming set while straddling the rubber is unfair.  Taking the ball out of the glove without pitching it while on the rubber is unfair.  Simulating a pitching motion and/or flinching  is unfair.  The runners have to be able to know when it is safe to run or take their secondary leads.  Players, coaches and umpires all understand these rules and agree with why they are in place.  From other posts you've made, you seem to like the running game, yet you are advocating allowing deceptive pitching moves that will virtually eliminate the stolen base.  I have no doubt that such rule changes aren't being considered.  In fact, the only balk rule change they've done recently was to add another balk rule that I happen to disagree with.  They made putting two legal moves together - the fake to third and the throw to first - a balk.  Both moves are legal, but now you can't do them in conjunction with each other.  As if that was somehow a major cause of the length of play.  Now that's a balk rule I would be in favor of abolishing.

I think you make some good points, but also overstate your case when you say that " Players, coaches and umpires all understand these rules and agree with why they are in place".  There's no disagreement from anyone involved in the sport at all about any aspects of the rule?  That's hard to believe.

Deception is part of the game.  You hide signs, pitchers hide their grip on the pitch, infielders make phantom tags and catches when they don't have the ball, the hidden ball trick is legal, lefties intentionally make their windups and pickoff moves nearly identical, they step directly at 45 degrees while looking at the catcher and throwing to first.  I don't like the infield fly rule.  If you can let a popup drop, pick it, and turn two... good on you.

I think there are other ways to incentivize base stealing, such as making all throws to bases that don't result in an out a ball on the batter.  It's always been a little incongruous that a pitcher can only throw so many pitches before he's punished with a walk, but he can throw to first 25 times if he wants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem changing rules to improve play......for those against...why shouldn't managers be allowed to change pitchers  mid-at bat? Strike one from a 100 MPH flame thrower, then change pitchers and get strike two from a knuckle baller. 

Why can't you pull your starter after 3 innings, then bring him back in for the 9th? 

I'm all for eliminating down time.....no more reviews, just let the eye in the sky ump radio down when a call is blown...no more mid inning pitching changes....and while we are at it, raise all HR walls by 40 feet, lets get more balls in play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think you make some good points, but also overstate your case when you say that " Players, coaches and umpires all understand these rules and agree with why they are in place".  There's no disagreement from anyone involved in the sport at all about any aspects of the rule?  That's hard to believe.

Deception is part of the game.  You hide signs, pitchers hide their grip on the pitch, infielders make phantom tags and catches when they don't have the ball, the hidden ball trick is legal, lefties intentionally make their windups and pickoff moves nearly identical, they step directly at 45 degrees while looking at the catcher and throwing to first.  I don't like the infield fly rule.  If you can let a popup drop, pick it, and turn two... good on you.

I think there are other ways to incentivize base stealing, such as making all throws to bases that don't result in an out a ball on the batter.  It's always been a little incongruous that a pitcher can only throw so many pitches before he's punished with a walk, but he can throw to first 25 times if he wants.

Drungo, from my experience there simply isn't any kind of groundswell among players. coaches and umpires concerning the balk rules.  That is no overstatement, it is the simple fact.  The next time I hear a complaint that deception should be legal will be the first.  I think maybe you are making way too much of how many lines in the rulebook are typed to clarify the balk rules.  Nobody cares about that.  They would undoubtedly, however, be up in arms if the rule was vague and not clearly spelled out.  As it is you get the occasional offensive coach wanting a balk called because the pitcher takes a deep breath and you have to explain to him that breathing is legal.  Or the defensive coach asking "What did he do?," when a balk is called, which happens all the time.  You simply tell him and that's nearly always the end of it.  If the rules weren't specific, these discussions would be a lot more heated, of that I am certain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • There is plenty of benefit for AR.  He learns, he is up here playing in the majors instead of the minors and gets to start to learn the pitchers up here.  It’s always a benefit for the player to be in the majors vs the minors.  He’s kind of the reason they are doing this. And the team obviously benefits from having a far superior player to what they have now.
    • I see your point, and a Machado return as it existed in 2018 is probably the lowest I'd go.  But we are talking about 2.5 months of success.  If this is the 2021/22 offseason, and he has sustauined these numbers , I am demanding a lot more.
    • After busting out of the gate as some of the top teams in their respective leagues....our A to AA affiliates are starting to show some signs of regression.  Nothing crazy yet, but: Delmarva (A-):  25-15 overall, still good for first in their division, but we are now behind Tampa's team in our league and even with Milwaukee. Aberdeen (A+):   23-18 overall, now at 2nd place in our division behind the Yankee affiliate.  Tampa's team is also ahead of our pace. Bowie (AA):   27-13 overall,  best record in our league although the Yankee affiliate is right on our heels.   Norfolk (AAA):  15-24 overall, out of 20 teams in our AAA league, we have the 15th best record.  That's....something. So still good overall, but not as runaway good.   Aberdeen has lost 8 of their last 11............hopefully that turns around real quickly.
    • The minor league season is only 7 weeks old and Munday has already been promoted once.   I don't think anyone has been promoted twice yet this year.   I think they'll probably let him hang around in Aberdeen for a while.
    • I actually agree that if it will benefit the team next year to bring him up now, we should bring him up now. However, it is unwise to bring up one single person, however great, and add him to a team of replacement level players. Mullins is great and reasonably healthy, several guys  are great or near-great and not reasonably healthy, and then we have a vast quantity of Warm bodies who cannot get out of each other’s way. We added 19-year old Manny to a team that was already excellent and essentially complete, needing only an additional quality starter or two(which actually didn’t matter in 2012.) Can you imagine adding 19 year old Manny  this team?  Unless we’re going to promote multiple people, I don’t see any benefit to promoting AR, either for the team or for him.
    • With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, I’d say no.    He was a great player from day one, it only took the Padres two years to make the playoffs, and he signed a long term deal.    I’d say it worked out well for the Padres.    I want to make a couple of points about the idea of bringing Rutschman up soon.   I have very mixed feelings about it.   I don’t have the sense that he’d be a top tier major league catcher right away.   But, he probably could hold his own, and he’d almost certainly be an upgrade to what we have now.   And, I think getting a decent amount of major league experience this year would set him up to be a better major league player next year.  Enough to help drive the O’s to being competitive (.500+) next year?   Probably not.     
    • Don’t agree, the return would have to be even better than what they got for Machado, who was a rental. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...