Jump to content
Tony-OH

Who will be #21-#25 prospects?

Who will be #21-#25 prospects?  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will be #21-#25 prospects?

    • Bannon, Pop, L. Rodriguez, Sedlock, Tate
    • Bannon, Stauffer, Pop, L. Rodriguez, Fenter
    • Fenter, Tate, Stauffer, Cumberland, Bannon
    • Stauffer, Tate, Grenier, McCoy, L. Rodriguez
    • Tate, Fenter, Stauffer, L.Rodriguez, Pop


Recommended Posts

I don't really have a clue at this point. I think it's one of the first two, and ended up picking the second one. Fifth has Tate too high, and I don't see Cumberland, Greiner or McCoy being this high, so that eliminates the third and fourth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am down on Tate So I chose the only option that did not include him, , Which of course means that that is the only guaranteed wrong answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Philip said:

Sedlock has fallen a long way.

He’s actually rose from not being in the top 30 last year.

He was pitching with basically a dead arm for almost 2 years.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

I would think Sedlock and Fenter have to be in the top 25 but there is no option with both of them.

Yeah, I chose two but somehow missed that Sedlock was not among the five. I'd think he'd be #21 or 22.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

I think Luke's pretty high on Cumberland.  But other than that I generally agree with your take.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

I think Luke's pretty high on Cumberland.  But other than that I generally agree with your take.

Yes, yes he is and I can't seem to shake him of it, but appreciate his persistence! :D

I believe he had three guys I did not have on my list at all and we ended up including two if I recall. Honestly when we get into the late 20s area, arguments can be made for the guys that just missed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

Yeah, this was pretty much the reasoning I went with.  I also felt Stauffer and Fenter should be a tad higher than Sedlock and Tate, hence option 2 over option 1.  I've got Sedlock and Tate at 26 and 27.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yes, yes he is and I can't seem to shake him of it, but appreciate his persistence! :D

I believe he had three guys I did not have on my list at all and we ended up including two if I recall. Honestly when we get into the late 20s area, arguments can be made for the guys that just missed.

 

When he tries that stuff, just say to him, "Matthias Dietz."   

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

I think Luke's pretty high on Cumberland.  But other than that I generally agree with your take.

If in the 20s in a system is high, then guilty as charged. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

When he tries that stuff, just say to him, "Matthias Dietz."   

Ha, got me there. Overestimated the ability of a guy to make poor mechanics work. I thought the move to the pen would help. It’s a shame, the raw stuff was as good as Baumann or Harvey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







×
×
  • Create New...