Jump to content
weams

Villar Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas

Recommended Posts

The Shorebirds had 15 pitchers (over half) that were age 23-26 this year.    Seems like a virtual lock that Easton will start out there.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Thanks. Seems like a pretty positive review of him.  He fits the type of pitcher that Elias drafted last year, once he finally did draft a pitcher. College starter. He was 22 last year in Aberdeen, a bunch of the SP we drafted were 21-23 in the GCL. 

A funny thought for anyone that thinks we should’ve kicked in money for Villar to buy a better prospect... I wonder how much Miami would have sold us their Competitive Balance pick for?  Probably not the 2-3 million that DD was handing them out for. 

I don't believe the competitive balance pick was available.  IIRC, competitive balance picks can only be traded in-season.  I'm not certain about that, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aglets said:

The Shorebirds had 15 pitchers (over half) that were age 23-26 this year.    Seems like a virtual lock that Easton will start out there.

Interesting. Thanks for the info. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NCRaven said:

FWIW, I think that Elias’ “this gives us a chance to use younger players” is total BS.  Who?  Richie Martin?  Can’t wait.  But, he was determined to cut payroll and he accomplished that.

I imagine Rylan Bannon's turning cartwheels this morning and will do a little fist pump anytime Starlin Castro, Jason Kipnis, Jonathan Schoop, etc. sign anywhere other than Baltimore.  Unlike Mountcastle/Diaz, he probably isn't young/good enough for Opening Day to be any obstacle, so I think he might end up with a clean shot in spring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To those saying Villar was given up for nothing need to realize they had already decided to give him up for nothing, and were able to get a scratch off ticket in the end. I'll take that over nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Besides we’ve discussed at Nausea... The National TV share is 110 million and the broadcast rights are $59 million 3 or 4 years ago.

Surely there is enough additional revenue in tickets, concessions, memorabilia, corporate sponsorships, and other secondary sources of income to cover the operating expenses. I posted a link earlier in this discussion about all the money that MLB was raking in that had nothing to do with the team winning games.
 

That’s not including receiving money awarded by the luxury tax process. 
 

I don’t think they really need a cash infusion from the Angelos family coffers anyway.

Last year they had a $70 million payroll. By the math they should have a 80* million dollar surplus (160-70=90MM). That would include 10 million for the international process, adding additional scouts, paying newly created executive positions etc.

This year they will have at least that number again.

Heck they could probably pay off Davis and move him off the roster

I’d quibble with several of your points here, while agreeing with your overall point that the Orioles probably turned a very healthy profit in 2019.    My quibbles are:

1.   The $59 mm/yr in rights fees are what the RSDC panel awarded, but the part contested by MASN hasn’t been paid yet while the court challenges are still pending.    If/when it eventually gets paid, it will be an extra $95 mm or so to the O’s for 2012-16.     But, it means the O’s 75/80% ownership of MASN will be less valuable by about $150 mm, so a net loss to the Orioles.    

2.   Forbes reported the O’s 2018 revenues at $251 mm.    That includes the national TV money, the MASN rights fees, gate receipts and whatever else.    The only thing it should exclude are the O’s share of MASN’s profits, which as mentioned, are in flux due to the  arbitration and court proceedings; and whatever additional rights fees MASN has to pay.   

3.    The payroll figure I’ve seen for 2019 was $83.6 mm, not $70 mm.    Because of benefits, the costs of the players are actually higher.   For example, in 2018 Bb-ref pegged payroll at $141 mm but Forbes pegged “player costs” at $161 mm due to benefits.    So I’d guess the 2019 figure is probably $95 mm or so.

4.   Gate receipts will be down for 2019, roughly in proportion to the attendance drop.    Probably $8 mm in lost revenue there compared to the year before.    

5.   How much the team spent on non-payroll stuff is anybody’s guess.    I assume it went up a lot per Elias’ remarks when he took the job.    Whether “a lot” is $10 mm, $25 mm or $50 mm is a complete unknown (though I really doubt it’s $50 mm).     

All in all, there’s a lot we don’t know, but yes I think the team probably turned a good profit in 2019.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I imagine Rylan Bannon's turning cartwheels this morning and will do a little fist pump anytime Starlin Castro, Jason Kipnis, Jonathan Schoop, etc. sign anywhere other than Baltimore.  Unlike Mountcastle/Diaz, he probably isn't young/good enough for Opening Day to be any obstacle, so I think he might end up with a clean shot in spring.

I think Bannon has a clean shot at being in Norfolk on OD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He was old for short season ball last year.

You can say that about 90% of the pitchers we drafted last year.  He'll start in Delmarva, and Delmarva will have another really good pitching staff.  In fact, all of our full season clubs will have good-really good rotations.  We might see "piggybacking" to start the season at multiple levels.  Elias really built up the depth of the full season clubs in 2020 by targeting only NCAA pitchers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I imagine Rylan Bannon's turning cartwheels this morning and will do a little fist pump anytime Starlin Castro, Jason Kipnis, Jonathan Schoop, etc. sign anywhere other than Baltimore.  Unlike Mountcastle/Diaz, he probably isn't young/good enough for Opening Day to be any obstacle, so I think he might end up with a clean shot in spring.

When he does make the show, he’s  going to be a fan favorite I bet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t know if the O’s are capable of always being in the top 15, but they’ve shown they can and will do it for sustained stretches if they think they’re in a competitive window.     And it’s easier to do that if they strip payroll low while they’re not competitive.      

The bigger picture we won't get any information on for another year or two is are we paying off the credit card bill for the Machado teams or building a nest egg for the Rutschman teams?  

With enough progress this year, it isn't inconceivable that next offseason we're bidders for DJ LeMahieu or Justin Turner to be a '21-'23 infielder while we see what Henderson/Hall/Hernaiz/Bannon/Grenier grow into.  Those two guys hit me as not as onerous as the Werth/Hosmer whoppers it took for other decrepit teams to demonstrate their return to FA relevance (and of course in the end Werth did endure nicely for Washington).  At SS next offseason, Semien and Simmons are probably too hot, and Villar/Profar too cold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

You can say that about 90% of the pitchers we drafted last year.  He'll start in Delmarva, and Delmarva will have another really good pitching staff.  In fact, all of our full season clubs will have good-really good rotations.  We might see "piggybacking" to start the season at multiple levels.  Elias really built up the depth of the full season clubs in 2020 by targeting only NCAA pitchers.  

They will probably perform well but I'm not certain that having a bunch of old for their level guys performing well is all that useful past posting good won/loss records.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding a 2B is not a problem for the O's.  Alberto probably gets a chance in ST to show he can hit lefties and righties.   How he does may decide whether he plays everyday or is  platooned vs lefties.

Wilkerson came through the O's system as mainly a 2B and hit well vs righties in the majors last season.   He too will probably get the opportunity to show he can hit lefties in ST.

Valaika can also play 2B as well as SS and he hit pretty well vs lefties though that was in Colorado so he as to prove it in Baltimore.

What the O's need in the infield is a veteran SS and probably some help at 3B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Sure, that’s why I’m here.  Diaz is a priority for me to get info on and I’ll work on that.  Physically, he has always been ‘lower body thick’ and I love that in hitters who aren’t flying out of the box.  Now, he’s closer to ‘upper body thick’ and defined strongly throughout his arms, shoulders and neck.  He put muscle on, not a ton but he also took some of his weight and made it into muscle.  That’s not the easiest process so maybe I’ll find out some more. Santander has similar dimensions but a different build.  He’s slightly leaner but his lower legs are explosive and he can run, stop and start quickly.  Diaz seems more stuck to a spot but not badly.   Stats tell a different story as Santander can put up some pop numbers, but that’s more swing and athleticism.  His neck isn’t huge across like Diaz’s is now.  If they were both tracking a ball in the outfield, Santander can probably get to it and be ready to throw quickly while that process may be slower for a slightly heavier legged guy like Diaz.  Not an insult, just a differing physical profile.   I’ve heard the comp so many times for Diaz as being Melky Cabrera.  I don’t think that’s off by too much because I could see him making contact and driving gappers hard to the wall if he gets his stroke going.  I’d love to see it with consistency.  I don’t think that Santander is more powerful but he’s proven that he can do more with his swing at this point in his career. Thats a good question.
    • I’m here for you.  I’ve seen him throw and pitch very little but he’s definitely got stuff. It’s not straight and flat so I bet he’s got good hands or a release that makes movement happen. To be honest I remember him more on TV than from here at camp.  When I pick my roster for the contest, he WILL be on it.  I don’t see him being a dark horse who can surprise the league like Means did but a highly usable piece and one who can protect leads.   I don’t know how much value there is in that on the 2020 O’s specifically but he’s my pre-setup guy in my breaking camp 26.  
    • Where’s their camp?  I’ll go look too!
    • I don’t have an immense amount of confidence at this point.  I’d be happily surprised if he found a place.   He didn’t respond well to adversity last year by any measure but that doesn’t mean he’s done for good.  It also doesn’t mean he can’t come back with a different mindset or focus. 
    • https://www.aworkoutroutine.com/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain/ https://www.bodybuilding.com/content/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain.html https://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/how-gain-muscle-just-week https://www.menshealth.com/fitness/a19544064/pound-of-size/ http://thehealthyexec.com/much-muscle-can-gain-6-weeks/ Just the top results for how much muscle can you gain in a week, but yeah....I'm probably making it up cause I know nothing. AVERAGE man can gain .25-.5 lbs in a week Factors: 1. Steroids- not saying he's not using 2. Experience Level - He's always been a bigger guy and was touted as being a gym rat/weightlifter by teammates 3. Muscle memory/regrowth - Easy to regain i.e. looks like 2017 Chris Davis 4.  Genetics - Saw him in the minors before he was Crush, always been a big dude.  Family probably is too 5. Age - Works against him but just 1 of 6 factors 6. Workout and diet - rich guy, can afford a 24/7 trainer and personal chef.  
    • Last year I predicted a 63-99 record and we know how that ended. I'll be surprised if we add to our win total of 54. Can't see anyone worse.
    • Me too, I am confident that Sulser is going to make the team. I’m also interested in hanging out at Tampa spring training to see if there any other wonderful pitchers they will throw away just because they have too many. Last year, the dodgers got Casey Sadler When he was placed on waivers, And I think he actually ended up pitching in the playoffs. Not bad, to go from waivers to the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...