Jump to content
MurphDogg

Bundy traded to Angels for Isaac Mattson, Kyle Bradish, Zach Peek, and Kyle Brnovich

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

This all assumes that quality was a choice.

I think the notion that GM's get to pick more players over a smaller amount of better ones in trades is the stuff of baseball fan message board fantasy land.  

No according to a voice clip from the Angels side, they said these were the guys Mike was targeting. He went in the direction of Quantity

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

No according to a voice clip from the Angels side, they said these were the guys Mike was targeting. He went in the direction of Quantity

Post the sound bite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Trea loved Smoak. He hated that we took Matusz. In hindsight, that draft was pretty bad.

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/draft/y2008/drafttracker.jsp

Right, he wanted him for the draft.

That is correct, I was thinking more along the lines that he wasn't a long term obsession.  Of course Trea would want a 1B over a pitcher in the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

He thinks player development can create quality from certain raw attributes. So he grabs as many with those attributes as possible.

The interesting thing will be to see if he's correct over the next 3-5 years. I find it all fascinating. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I still follow that guy on twitter. Very active in politics. Still comments on the O's, at least on twitter. Don't know if he still has that message board. I'm guessing he didn't really get any traffic.

He had three posters. And then it was just him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I don’t have it ... it was on the radio. Go find it yourself 

Or maybe you just need a timeout

It's amazing how the quotes / sound bites / clips that support your agenda always seem to magically disappear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The interesting thing will be to see if he's correct over the next 3-5 years. I find it all fascinating. 

Right. It reflects a gravitas about his scouting/player development chops. 

At some point, this process will have to include bringing in some high quality talent through FA or trade. Even Tampa isn't fully home-grown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wildbillhiccup said:

It's amazing how the quotes / sound bites / clips that support your agenda always seem to magically disappear. 

Enough. We don't need it.  We are all smart enough to make up our own minds on what is going on. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LookinUp said:

Right. It reflects a gravitas about his scouting/player development chops. 

At some point, this process will have to include bringing in some high quality talent through FA or trade. Even Tampa isn't fully home-grown.

But it is fully targeted. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weams said:

He had three posters. And then it was just him. 

I give the guy a certain amount of credit. He has strong opinions. Had passion about this baseball stuff and tried to build his own thing when it became clear this place wasn't for him.

Now he's into politics, so I pity him. (kidding, sort of) I'm glad he has a thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I give the guy a certain amount of credit. He has strong opinions. Had passion about this baseball stuff and tried to build his own thing when it became clear this place wasn't for him.

Now he's into politics, so I pity him. (kidding, sort of) I'm glad he has a thing. 

I met him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wildbillhiccup said:

It's amazing how the quotes / sound bites / clips that support your agenda always seem to magically disappear. 

They haven’t disappeared. The interview was  played by 105.7 FM.

so how would I have it? 
 

And the Sun Articles were posted with links

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Smoak's a strange player. Seems like a middling power hitter, but when you look under the hood he flirts with a .350 OBP most years. 

Most years = 2017-2019 (.355, .350 and .342) and precisely zero years the rest of his career from 2010-2016. His OBP in those years from high to low was .334, .323, .314, .307, .299(!), .290(!!!), and .275 (!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • That's why people get nostalgic about the pre-free agency days.  There was no discussion of player retention beyond "is he still a positive for the team?"  If yes, then keep him. But I've long since made peace with the fact that the old setup is both awful for players and never, ever coming back.  While fans loved having Mike Cuellar for eight years on absurdly team-friendly terms, maybe Mike Cuellar would have liked some say in where he played and for how much.  And I don't blame him one bit.
    • I’m very jealous of anyone who has a pension as opposed to (or in addition to) a 401 k type plan.    One of the real perks of being a government worker, for example.   I’ve made a nice living as a lawyer but what I’ve saved is what I’ve got coming to me, and nothing else.    My firm won’t be paying me a dime after I retire.   
    • I could see Buck steering the ship for couple years while the Astros deal with the ramifications of this scandal. I think the last thing the Astros want to do here is go with an unknown quantity. 
    • I know it seems counterintuitive, since there are 27 outs in a game and only 4-5 runs scored on average, so that seems like more like .2 runs per out.    But have a look at this base-out matrix, which shows the expected number of runs scored in an inning depending on which bases are occupied and how many outs there are.   This matrix is based on actual game data, not theory.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebaseballscholar.com/2017/08/14/sabermetrics-101-re24/amp/ Let’s take the simplest example, the leadoff batter.    If he grounds out (so now it’s bases empty, one out), the expected runs in the inning are .243.    If he’s safe at first (so runner on first, nobody out), the expected runs are .831.    So, the increase in expected runs between making that play or not is .590.      There are other situations on the chart where the differential is higher or lower than that.    On the high side, let’s say you’ve got runners on 1st and 2nd and one out.    Make a play there to record an out and hold the runners, and the expected runs are only .343.    Fail to make that play and so it’s bases loaded and only one out, and the expected runs increase to 1.520. Anyway, someone did a weighted average of all these scenarios and came up with .6 for an average.    If I remember correctly.       
    • Connolly was and apparently still is literally Buck's PR man, so I'm not surprised by his thoughts on this matter. 
    • Dan Connolly has a good column in The Athletic about it.   He said that a few weeks ago, he would have thought the Astros were the LAST team that would ever consider hiring Buck for the reasons you give.   And that those reasons still exist.   But in terms of taking over leadership of a talented team in crisis, in terms of making sure no further cheating takes place and protecting the integrity moving forward, suddenly he MIGHT be the best guy they could bring in.   It's a good read.
    • I was single for a while in 2010.  4 different women made me watch "He's just not that into you" with them and 1 made me watch "Eat Pray Love".    And I even watched "Sex and the City 2" a couple of times.   Let me tell you Sex and City 2 is not a good movie by anyone's viewpoint.   If I could get through them a wife should be able to make it through a war movie here or there. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...