Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?

Do you approve of the Villar trade?  

63 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you approve of the Villar trade?


  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/21/2019 at 21:20

Recommended Posts

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

No

If Villar has another 3.5-4.0 WAR season it will look really bad. If the Marlins trade him at the deadline for considerably more it will look even worse IMO.

If he produces the Streamer 1.8 WAR or less, I might be willing to reconsider my position

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems as the option I preferred was not really an option, so getting something is better than nothing. 

 

Obviously I would have rather watched Villar be a part of next seasons team rather than a straight non tender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

I don’t know Frobby. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

It seems as the option I preferred was not really an option, so getting something is better than nothing. 

 

Obviously I would have rather watched Villar be a part of next seasons team rather than a straight non tender.

This is where I'm at as well.  Maybe I'm short sighted, but for me, Easton Lucas is not worth the price of losing Villar's entertainment value and what he will bring to make this summer at least a bit more bearable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem isn’t that Villar was traded, it’s that the person they received appears to be an organizational player.  If the front office sees him as a potential major leaguer then I would feel differently.  If they didn’t intend to get someone good I would prefer a AAAA middle infielder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

My problem isn’t that Villar was traded, it’s that the person they received appears to be an organizational player.  If the front office sees him as a potential major leaguer then I would feel differently.  If they didn’t intend to get someone good I would prefer a AAAA middle infielder.

Perhaps another guy they could keep a season or two and flip. That’s a great idea except they usually cost more than the minimum due to arbitration 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t like the process. I believe they put an artificial obstacle in their way ( non-tender deadline) which reduced their leverage.  The absolute worst case scenario with tendering a contract would be 1/6 of his awarded salary. With free agency proceeding slowly, again,  I would assume his market will heat up once the big contracts are settled.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Larry18 said:

I didn’t like the process. I believe they put an artificial obstacle in their way ( non-tender deadline) which reduced their leverage.  The absolute worst case scenario with tendering a contract would be 1/6 of his awarded salary. With free agency proceeding slowly, again,  I would assume his market will heat up once the big contracts are settled.

 

 

That is 1.7 million you would just be tossing.  I'm against that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

No

If Villar has another 3.5-4.0 WAR season it will look really bad. If the Marlins trade him at the deadline for considerably more it will look even worse IMO.

If he produces the Streamer 1.8 WAR or less, I might be willing to reconsider my position

 

Roll Tide is correct that there are possible outcomes where the trade would appear in hindsight to have not worked out, and possible outcomes where the trade would appear to have worked out.  I think that is pretty much true of all trades.  

What I'm in favor of is Elias having a definitive plan and sticking to that plan.  Will every move he makes definitely work out?  Probably not.  I, for one, am going to try not to agonize over each and every step along the way.  He said from the get go that it will be a process and that not every move will be easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Roll Tide is correct that there are possible outcomes where the trade would appear in hindsight to have not worked out, and possible outcomes where the trade would appear to have worked out.  I think that is pretty much true of all trades.  

What I'm in favor of is Elias having a definitive plan and sticking to that plan.  Will every move he makes definitely work out?  Probably not.  I, for one, am going to try not to agonize over each and every step along the way.  He said from the get go that it will be a process and that not every move will be easy.

We agree and there is little benefit to dwelling on it.

But I’m thoroughly unsatisfied with the Villar deal. For me personally the only statement that applies to me personally is my last about him underperforming next year.

Even then I think Schoop played and produced well here because he liked it and was comfortable here. He really hasn’t been good since he left.

People can say that baseball is just a business and there is no human element. Personally I disagree .... To some guys it doesn’t matter but others it almost has to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • That's why people get nostalgic about the pre-free agency days.  There was no discussion of player retention beyond "is he still a positive for the team?"  If yes, then keep him. But I've long since made peace with the fact that the old setup is both awful for players and never, ever coming back.  While fans loved having Mike Cuellar for eight years on absurdly team-friendly terms, maybe Mike Cuellar would have liked some say in where he played and for how much.  And I don't blame him one bit.
    • I’m very jealous of anyone who has a pension as opposed to (or in addition to) a 401 k type plan.    One of the real perks of being a government worker, for example.   I’ve made a nice living as a lawyer but what I’ve saved is what I’ve got coming to me, and nothing else.    My firm won’t be paying me a dime after I retire.   
    • I could see Buck steering the ship for couple years while the Astros deal with the ramifications of this scandal. I think the last thing the Astros want to do here is go with an unknown quantity. 
    • I know it seems counterintuitive, since there are 27 outs in a game and only 4-5 runs scored on average, so that seems like more like .2 runs per out.    But have a look at this base-out matrix, which shows the expected number of runs scored in an inning depending on which bases are occupied and how many outs there are.   This matrix is based on actual game data, not theory.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebaseballscholar.com/2017/08/14/sabermetrics-101-re24/amp/ Let’s take the simplest example, the leadoff batter.    If he grounds out (so now it’s bases empty, one out), the expected runs in the inning are .243.    If he’s safe at first (so runner on first, nobody out), the expected runs are .831.    So, the increase in expected runs between making that play or not is .590.      There are other situations on the chart where the differential is higher or lower than that.    On the high side, let’s say you’ve got runners on 1st and 2nd and one out.    Make a play there to record an out and hold the runners, and the expected runs are only .343.    Fail to make that play and so it’s bases loaded and only one out, and the expected runs increase to 1.520. Anyway, someone did a weighted average of all these scenarios and came up with .6 for an average.    If I remember correctly.       
    • Connolly was and apparently still is literally Buck's PR man, so I'm not surprised by his thoughts on this matter. 
    • Dan Connolly has a good column in The Athletic about it.   He said that a few weeks ago, he would have thought the Astros were the LAST team that would ever consider hiring Buck for the reasons you give.   And that those reasons still exist.   But in terms of taking over leadership of a talented team in crisis, in terms of making sure no further cheating takes place and protecting the integrity moving forward, suddenly he MIGHT be the best guy they could bring in.   It's a good read.
    • I was single for a while in 2010.  4 different women made me watch "He's just not that into you" with them and 1 made me watch "Eat Pray Love".    And I even watched "Sex and the City 2" a couple of times.   Let me tell you Sex and City 2 is not a good movie by anyone's viewpoint.   If I could get through them a wife should be able to make it through a war movie here or there. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...