Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?

Do you approve of the Villar trade?  

63 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you approve of the Villar trade?


  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/21/2019 at 21:20

Recommended Posts

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

No

If Villar has another 3.5-4.0 WAR season it will look really bad. If the Marlins trade him at the deadline for considerably more it will look even worse IMO.

If he produces the Streamer 1.8 WAR or less, I might be willing to reconsider my position

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems as the option I preferred was not really an option, so getting something is better than nothing. 

 

Obviously I would have rather watched Villar be a part of next seasons team rather than a straight non tender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Before we traded Villar for Easton, I ran a poll asking if people approved of putting Villar on waivers (which was reported at the time) and/or DFAing him.    58% of the voters said no.   

 

Now that we know what actually went down, do you approve of the Villar for Easton trade?    No need to give a narrative response, since this was already discussed exhaustively in other threads.    I just like having these poll threads to look back on after the fact, so please vote.    

I don’t know Frobby. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

It seems as the option I preferred was not really an option, so getting something is better than nothing. 

 

Obviously I would have rather watched Villar be a part of next seasons team rather than a straight non tender.

This is where I'm at as well.  Maybe I'm short sighted, but for me, Easton Lucas is not worth the price of losing Villar's entertainment value and what he will bring to make this summer at least a bit more bearable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem isn’t that Villar was traded, it’s that the person they received appears to be an organizational player.  If the front office sees him as a potential major leaguer then I would feel differently.  If they didn’t intend to get someone good I would prefer a AAAA middle infielder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

My problem isn’t that Villar was traded, it’s that the person they received appears to be an organizational player.  If the front office sees him as a potential major leaguer then I would feel differently.  If they didn’t intend to get someone good I would prefer a AAAA middle infielder.

Perhaps another guy they could keep a season or two and flip. That’s a great idea except they usually cost more than the minimum due to arbitration 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t like the process. I believe they put an artificial obstacle in their way ( non-tender deadline) which reduced their leverage.  The absolute worst case scenario with tendering a contract would be 1/6 of his awarded salary. With free agency proceeding slowly, again,  I would assume his market will heat up once the big contracts are settled.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Larry18 said:

I didn’t like the process. I believe they put an artificial obstacle in their way ( non-tender deadline) which reduced their leverage.  The absolute worst case scenario with tendering a contract would be 1/6 of his awarded salary. With free agency proceeding slowly, again,  I would assume his market will heat up once the big contracts are settled.

 

 

That is 1.7 million you would just be tossing.  I'm against that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

No

If Villar has another 3.5-4.0 WAR season it will look really bad. If the Marlins trade him at the deadline for considerably more it will look even worse IMO.

If he produces the Streamer 1.8 WAR or less, I might be willing to reconsider my position

 

Roll Tide is correct that there are possible outcomes where the trade would appear in hindsight to have not worked out, and possible outcomes where the trade would appear to have worked out.  I think that is pretty much true of all trades.  

What I'm in favor of is Elias having a definitive plan and sticking to that plan.  Will every move he makes definitely work out?  Probably not.  I, for one, am going to try not to agonize over each and every step along the way.  He said from the get go that it will be a process and that not every move will be easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Roll Tide is correct that there are possible outcomes where the trade would appear in hindsight to have not worked out, and possible outcomes where the trade would appear to have worked out.  I think that is pretty much true of all trades.  

What I'm in favor of is Elias having a definitive plan and sticking to that plan.  Will every move he makes definitely work out?  Probably not.  I, for one, am going to try not to agonize over each and every step along the way.  He said from the get go that it will be a process and that not every move will be easy.

We agree and there is little benefit to dwelling on it.

But I’m thoroughly unsatisfied with the Villar deal. For me personally the only statement that applies to me personally is my last about him underperforming next year.

Even then I think Schoop played and produced well here because he liked it and was comfortable here. He really hasn’t been good since he left.

People can say that baseball is just a business and there is no human element. Personally I disagree .... To some guys it doesn’t matter but others it almost has to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 118 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






×
×
  • Create New...