Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sportsfan8703

Rule 5: Michael Rucker - RHP - Cubs

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Dale said:

The inefficiency of the pitching market gives hope that the Orioles have discovered a viable middle relief option for 2020

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

But then we had the #1 pick in the Milb portion taken from our system?  So does that mean we have the best depth AA-A ball?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

It also helped that everyone passed on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Right, which means everyone passed on him at least once.

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, interloper said:

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Maybe I'm missing something but it seems that you're saying teams passed on him and therefore he's not good/the O's evaluation is not great. My bad if that's not what you were saying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Compared to the other Rule 5 picks, I like our side of the deal.

I'm not sure grading him on "the low 90's" is accurate for our guy.

I'd like to see the O's tandem Rucker and Bailey for 9 outs each and see if they can handle one game out of 5. Maybe that's way too optimistic on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

 

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

I like that statement. It’s probably 50/50 that we trade Givens. Fry might be useless if they pass implement the new rule. Right now the only pitchers that we can pencil in are,

Means, Cobb, Wojo

Givens, Harvey, Bleier, Castro, Armstrong

That’s 5 spots up for grabs and I think we’re going to lean towards pitchers that can go multiple innings. I mean, we’re going to have to with that rotation. 

I think we bring in 2-3 vet SP on milb/mlb min deals. We shouldn’t do anything to mess up the prospects development in AAA until they are ready. That includes Akin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • A fanciful can to kick - contracts aside, from here would you rather have John Means or Chris Sale?
    • Dombrowski having gotten Realmuto to take his $$$ I guess has bowed out on Semien, and Twins beat guy reporting his team and Brewers possible  suitors.   I can get kicking Jorge Polanco, Orlando Arcia and Luis Urias all off SS island, though with Lewis coming I guess Minnesota hoping for 2B like Red Sox did before Enrique.   Brewers and Twins would even give Galvis/Villar landing spots before us assuming OAK/PHI/CIN naturally ahead of us for the main three.    Galvis back to Philly seems likelier now.  
    • I think it was Bob Feller, who said of Dwight Gooden, “I would rather have his future than my past.“ Looking at today’s pitching environment, I would much rather have the future of our own guys, then hope for a continuation of the past of the other teams’ guys. I continue to think that pitching is going to be the least of our problems in this season.
    • The Bills were run-blitzing with zone coverage.  You actually can't play man vs Lamar.  He just takes off for 25 yards every time.   You also can't really screen with Lamar as your QB, because it doesn't work vs run-blitzes, and they never do normal blitzes like they would vs Aaron Rodgers.  Lamar had a lot of success with short passes in the flat vs the Bills.  He threw 14 out of 22 non-throwaway passes less than 5 air yards from scrimmage. (this was calculated by me watching, so it might not correlate with any published stats)  He completed 10 of them, 1 was dropped, and 3 were off-target (1 was from a bad snap.) I think they attacked the Bills correctly up until the interception.  And then on the very next play he got knocked out of the game because our OL had their worst game of the season.  If Lamar stayed in the game I think the Ravens could have maybe made it interesting.
    • So I think that there are 2 extreme camps among sports fans regarding key talent: one side wants nothing more than to keep all homegrown talent, completely blind to their faults, and the other side wants nothing more than to blow everything up every 2 years because everyone sucks.  Being honest with myself, I lean toward the first camp, and I was wrong about wanting to keep Flacco after he won us a super bowl.  I'd like to think that in the future I won't hold unhealthy nostalgia for questionable players, but one can never be certain.   That said, I think that the fact that we're even debating the talent/skill level of a player that won an MVP as a 22 year old QB is insane.  Straight up insane.  Yet here we are.  Don't take this as me believing that this debate is not without merit.  It is.  But Flacco had the benefit of proving that he wasn't worth the contract.  It's not fair to assume that Lamar, who has been by far the superior player in the regular season, won't be worth a contract just because Flacco wasn't.  And given Lamar's age even a lengthy extension isn't going to take him past 28 or 29.  That's more or less the same age that Flacco was after he won the Super Bowl.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...