Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sportsfan8703

Rule 5: Michael Rucker - RHP - Cubs

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Dale said:

The inefficiency of the pitching market gives hope that the Orioles have discovered a viable middle relief option for 2020

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

But then we had the #1 pick in the Milb portion taken from our system?  So does that mean we have the best depth AA-A ball?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

It also helped that everyone passed on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Right, which means everyone passed on him at least once.

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, interloper said:

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Maybe I'm missing something but it seems that you're saying teams passed on him and therefore he's not good/the O's evaluation is not great. My bad if that's not what you were saying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Compared to the other Rule 5 picks, I like our side of the deal.

I'm not sure grading him on "the low 90's" is accurate for our guy.

I'd like to see the O's tandem Rucker and Bailey for 9 outs each and see if they can handle one game out of 5. Maybe that's way too optimistic on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

 

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

I like that statement. It’s probably 50/50 that we trade Givens. Fry might be useless if they pass implement the new rule. Right now the only pitchers that we can pencil in are,

Means, Cobb, Wojo

Givens, Harvey, Bleier, Castro, Armstrong

That’s 5 spots up for grabs and I think we’re going to lean towards pitchers that can go multiple innings. I mean, we’re going to have to with that rotation. 

I think we bring in 2-3 vet SP on milb/mlb min deals. We shouldn’t do anything to mess up the prospects development in AAA until they are ready. That includes Akin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I don't think the team is going to be sold.  I think they are latched onto this franchise like an engorged tick.
    • Why did Toronto give Semien 18 million for one year? Can someone explain to me why this is not an overpay? Do they think they're going to win the WS in 2021? .747 career OPS .679 OPS in 2020 Career 105 OPS+   I know he balled out in 2019, but I'm struggling to make sense of that deal.
    • As far as not  spending because of a possible sale........A winning team is worth more than a losing one.  As players like Rutschman, Rodriguez, DL  Hall, Henderson, Westburg, Kjerstad, Bauman, Lowther, Diaz graduate to the majors putting the FA around then on short term contracts to make the team win adds value.   The rebuild is in motion.   Seem logical to me that the O's ownership does what is necessary to make them win when at the right time.
    • This is probably question for Frobby but didn't the Orioles put money in escrow prior to the court ruling? Here is what a quick google search shows:  99m in Escrow. https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/bs-sp-masn-orioles-nationals-20191125-jw64tzklg5hjdbunvt2tmhjlz4-story.html
    • How come teams couldn't do that effectively during the regular season? If it were just that easy to beat Lamar, why does he have 25 regular season wins the last two years? I get his struggles in the passing game and he needs to improve, but Jackson's accuracy fell off a bit this year on those shorter passes and I think we all agree he doesn't have a great supporting cast at wide receiver. Jackson can throw the deep ball when he has time and can set his feet, and we all know he he's not just another running QB, but the best running QB ever which is whole other dimension to his game that NO ONE has, even other good "running" QBs. As I said before, I'm ok with giving him another year to see if he can improve, and with the cap situation, it might be the perfect year to hold off on an extension so they can give him some help next season on the outside.  Saying that, I do think this team could be a Super Bowl contender with Jackson at QB regardless of his playoff failures. Give him some actual playmakers to throw to, and better passing scheme and I think he could be fantastic once again.  BTW, no one can look at the Ravens personnel against the Chiefs and think they really were a better team regardless of how Jackson plays. Mahomes is the best QB in the league right now and his weapons are head and shoulders above what Lamar has.  
    • If you are talking about the lawsuits yes, they were collecting it.  They haven't been allowed to spend the disputed money.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...