Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sportsfan8703

Rule 5: Michael Rucker - RHP - Cubs

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Dale said:

The inefficiency of the pitching market gives hope that the Orioles have discovered a viable middle relief option for 2020

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

But then we had the #1 pick in the Milb portion taken from our system?  So does that mean we have the best depth AA-A ball?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Don't mean to throw it in the face of a new guy, but we acquired Rucker because of the Rule V draft and not any inefficiency in the market.  We had space in the Rule V draft because of a lack of high quality depth in our minor leagues that would have been subject to the Rule V draft.  

It also helped that everyone passed on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Right, which means everyone passed on him at least once.

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

40% the league wasn't eligible to make a selection.  You know that other things go into the rule 5 draft versus just a regular draft where every team selects a player.  

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If they coveted him they could have made room.

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, interloper said:

Just criticizing for the sake of it at this point. The scouts/data found something they like in the player, he's a long shot to stick, the O's have room on the roster, who cares? He's Drew Jackson. Why are you so concerned that other teams passed? It tells us nothing about the viability of Elias & Co's methods, or the skill of their scouting, or anything really. You're trying to sink your teeth into some kind of criticism here but you've got nothing but an air sandwich. 

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Wtf?  Go back and check what I was responding to.

Maybe I'm missing something but it seems that you're saying teams passed on him and therefore he's not good/the O's evaluation is not great. My bad if that's not what you were saying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

Compared to the other Rule 5 picks, I like our side of the deal.

I'm not sure grading him on "the low 90's" is accurate for our guy.

I'd like to see the O's tandem Rucker and Bailey for 9 outs each and see if they can handle one game out of 5. Maybe that's way too optimistic on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Milb.com isn’t high on Rucker’s chances of sticking:

 

11. Michael Rucker, RHP, Orioles (from Cubs): This won't be the rotation help the O's are looking for. Rucker was previously a starter in the Cubs system, but moved to the bullpen full-time in 2019. He spent almost the entire season at Double-A Tennessee, posting a 4.28 ERA with 89 strikeouts in 75 2/3 innings there. Rucker, who throws in the low-90s with a deceptive delivery, often pitched two or three innings, so he does bring potential as a long man for Baltimore. But without blowaway stuff or killer results, it might be asking too much of the O's to carry him along with Bailey, even in their current state. Stickiness level: Two [out of five]


https://www.milb.com/milb/news/toolshed-judging-rule-5-draft-stickiness/c-312187564

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

 

He was 2.68 ERA post-all star break, coinciding with an uptick in velocity.

I missed him in my process, didn’t ever look into him. But after seeing him, I definitely prefer him to Rony Garcia or Yohan Ramirez. 

 

 

I like that statement. It’s probably 50/50 that we trade Givens. Fry might be useless if they pass implement the new rule. Right now the only pitchers that we can pencil in are,

Means, Cobb, Wojo

Givens, Harvey, Bleier, Castro, Armstrong

That’s 5 spots up for grabs and I think we’re going to lean towards pitchers that can go multiple innings. I mean, we’re going to have to with that rotation. 

I think we bring in 2-3 vet SP on milb/mlb min deals. We shouldn’t do anything to mess up the prospects development in AAA until they are ready. That includes Akin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats







  • Posts

    • That's why people get nostalgic about the pre-free agency days.  There was no discussion of player retention beyond "is he still a positive for the team?"  If yes, then keep him. But I've long since made peace with the fact that the old setup is both awful for players and never, ever coming back.  While fans loved having Mike Cuellar for eight years on absurdly team-friendly terms, maybe Mike Cuellar would have liked some say in where he played and for how much.  And I don't blame him one bit.
    • I’m very jealous of anyone who has a pension as opposed to (or in addition to) a 401 k type plan.    One of the real perks of being a government worker, for example.   I’ve made a nice living as a lawyer but what I’ve saved is what I’ve got coming to me, and nothing else.    My firm won’t be paying me a dime after I retire.   
    • I could see Buck steering the ship for couple years while the Astros deal with the ramifications of this scandal. I think the last thing the Astros want to do here is go with an unknown quantity. 
    • I know it seems counterintuitive, since there are 27 outs in a game and only 4-5 runs scored on average, so that seems like more like .2 runs per out.    But have a look at this base-out matrix, which shows the expected number of runs scored in an inning depending on which bases are occupied and how many outs there are.   This matrix is based on actual game data, not theory.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebaseballscholar.com/2017/08/14/sabermetrics-101-re24/amp/ Let’s take the simplest example, the leadoff batter.    If he grounds out (so now it’s bases empty, one out), the expected runs in the inning are .243.    If he’s safe at first (so runner on first, nobody out), the expected runs are .831.    So, the increase in expected runs between making that play or not is .590.      There are other situations on the chart where the differential is higher or lower than that.    On the high side, let’s say you’ve got runners on 1st and 2nd and one out.    Make a play there to record an out and hold the runners, and the expected runs are only .343.    Fail to make that play and so it’s bases loaded and only one out, and the expected runs increase to 1.520. Anyway, someone did a weighted average of all these scenarios and came up with .6 for an average.    If I remember correctly.       
    • Connolly was and apparently still is literally Buck's PR man, so I'm not surprised by his thoughts on this matter. 
    • Dan Connolly has a good column in The Athletic about it.   He said that a few weeks ago, he would have thought the Astros were the LAST team that would ever consider hiring Buck for the reasons you give.   And that those reasons still exist.   But in terms of taking over leadership of a talented team in crisis, in terms of making sure no further cheating takes place and protecting the integrity moving forward, suddenly he MIGHT be the best guy they could bring in.   It's a good read.
    • I was single for a while in 2010.  4 different women made me watch "He's just not that into you" with them and 1 made me watch "Eat Pray Love".    And I even watched "Sex and the City 2" a couple of times.   Let me tell you Sex and City 2 is not a good movie by anyone's viewpoint.   If I could get through them a wife should be able to make it through a war movie here or there. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...