Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OrioleDog

Brian Roberts HOF eligibility

Recommended Posts

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/jaws-and-the-2020-hall-of-fame-ballot-one-and-dones-part-1/

Jay Jaffe with mini-biographies of some of the non-candidates coming up next year.

I never knew/had forgotten there was specific Bigbie testimony on his steroid use in the Mitchell report.

As a barometer for how successful NCAA picks once moved through the Orioles system, he went from supplemental 1st rounder in the 1999 draft to a June 14, 2001 debut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/26/2019 at 9:45 AM, OrioleDog said:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/jaws-and-the-2020-hall-of-fame-ballot-one-and-dones-part-1/

Jay Jaffe with mini-biographies of some of the non-candidates coming up next year.

I never knew/had forgotten there was specific Bigbie testimony on his steroid use in the Mitchell report.

As a barometer for how successful NCAA picks once moved through the Orioles system, he went from supplemental 1st rounder in the 1999 draft to a June 14, 2001 debut.

There wasn't.  Article is misleading.  Bigbie never saw Roberts use steroids, and had no first-hand knowledge of him doing so.  Bigbie shared that Roberts declined to use steroids with him and Segui, but said Roberts told him that he had previously tried it and didn't like it.  It was hearsay.  Roberts did later confirm that he did tell Bigbie that.  By his own later admission, Roberts was guilty, but listing him in the Mitchell report beforehand  based on hearsay was a questionable act on Mitchell's part, IMO.  No other player was listed based solely on hearsay.  Too bad for Roberts that he wasn't playing for Boston instead of Baltimore.  As I recall, there were no players listed by big Red Sox fan Mitchell in his report as having used PHDs while a Red Sox player, hearsay or otherwise, despite strong suspicions.  Incredibly, there were some of these "clean" Red Sox players that suddenly decided to use PHDs when traded to other teams.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Talk about "lack of imagination..." -- I'm talking about the ZiPS figures, not Szymborski or the Orioles. Hardly seems worth running the projections over five years if there's so little variation from year to year for each of those players. Maybe I'm just spoiled by wildly fluctuating careers in baseball sim games... or reality itself.
    • Wow, I'm shocked to see we're technically still in it. I basically called it done a couple of losses ago. But how could I forget, it ain't over till it's over! 6 games left, so basically the O's have been in contention for 90 percent of the season. Who'd a thunk?
    • The original intention is to stock up on international players which he’s also done. 
    • Well, we're up against it now.   Toronto beat the Yankees tonight.  There's now only one way the O's can make the playoffs: 1) Sweep the Red Sox 2) Toronto loses three to the Yankees the next three days 3) Seattle loses at least 2 games ([email protected], 4 vs Oak)*     *If Seattle goes 5-1 or better, we would still be OK if Houston loses at least 5 of their last 6 (2vsSea, 4 vs Tex) 4) Angels lose at least 1 more game (2 vs SD, 3 @Dodgers)
    • o   (vs. DEVIL RAYS, 9/21)   deGrom had 14 Strikeouts over 7 Inning Pitched tonight ...... but he was charged with a loss, as his Mets fell by a score of 2-1.   https://www.espn.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=401226481   For the 2020 season overall, deGrom has a 2.14 ERA and an 0.921 WHIP.   o
    • “Keegan Akin started in the bullpen this year with the Baltimore Orioles but has since moved to the rotation. So far it has been paying off for the Orioles as the rookie has been nothing short of impressive. In four starts Akin has produced a 2.35 ERA, 1.62 FIP, 36.4 K%, and 15.5 SwStr%. What is even more impressive is who he put those numbers up against. In those four starts he has faced the Yankees twice, the Braves, and the Blue Jays. All very formidable offenses.  “The only issue with Akin besides the small sample size is that he lives in the zone a little too much. He has a low O-Swing% of 26.3% which means hitters aren’t chasing him outside of the zone. With command issues stemming from the minors he also might be hesitant to live outside the zone and risk walking too many hitters. This is definitely something we have to monitor.   “Akin’s main strength is his fastball which has above average movement in both vertical and horizontal movement. While it doesn’t have much velocity the movement of the pitch makes up for it. He also places it well trying to place it high in the zone as often as possible. That fastball is paired with a changeup that straight up fools hitters. It comes in 10 mph slower than his fastball with late vertical drop at the bottom of the zone. His changeup currently holds an impressive 20.3 SwStr%. “As for 2021 Akin will be an interesting pitcher to evaluate. A very small sample size alone puts a lot of this into question. But with what looks like a solid fastball/changeup combination he will be worth a shot towards the end of drafts.” https://fantasy.fangraphs.com/analyzing-rookie-pitchers-part-ii/
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...