Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wildcard

The team I will be watching in 2020

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

NO ONE DOES.

NO TEAM DOES THIS.

 

Really,  You mean like no team doesn't call up their International League Player of the Year in September?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wildcard said:

First Base/DH -  Ryan Mountcastle.  Since the O's will have Santander, Hays and Diaz is the majors when they contend there is little reason to put Mountcastle in left field for a year.   He should refined his defense at 1B.  He begin 2020 at Norfolk and is promoted to he majors  a month later. 

Shortstop - Richie Martin  - I don't know if he has the bat to be successful in the majors but I like his defense.  Defensive metric suck, so I throw them out the window.   I think he plays all season at Norfolk   He may even play a month at 2021 at  AAA.  If he hits he is in the majors after that.

Left Field - Anthony Santander - With  the O's.

Center Field - Austin Hays-  With the O's.

Right Field - Yusniel  Diaz - Plays all season with Norfolk.   Is promoted to the O's one month into the 2021 season.

DH/1B  -  Trey Mancini -  He will play right field for the O's in 2020. But he will be 1B/DH  a month into the 2021 season.

John Means- With the O's.

 

Your post assumes a whole lot of straight line progression and no changes or surprises. I doubt that's ever happened with any organization.

There's a good chance Mancini and Means are dealt for prospects soon between now and July. 

Your conclusion about Mountcastle is based on other players. I disagree with that. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position that he can play well, meaning a left fielder is more valuable than a first baseman. In other words, the O's won't say....well, even though Mountcastle is a better overall player as a left fielder than Santander, since we already have Santander there, we have to find an open spot for Mountcastle. 

I think they'll do the opposite. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position he's able to play and the other guy will move. 

Richie Martin's destination will depend on whether the O's bring in someone between now and opening day who is better able to handle short. I happen to like Martin but I doubt anyone views him as a long term fixture. He's patching an obvious hole until someone else provides a better patch. And I don't see any circumstance where he would be held back in AAA in '21 to manipulate service time. He's not the profile for that in any way. 

And I believe in Diaz but he's anything but a sure thing and most definitely not a sure thing within the next year. 

As an example, 365 days ago, would you have made the same predictions about Martin, Santander, Diaz, Means, et al, that you do today? Things change. For better and for worse. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Really,  You mean like no team doesn't call up their International League Player of the Year in September?

At least Mountcastle is a top 100 prospect.  You are talking about guys that aren't in the top 250   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Your post assumes a whole lot of straight line progression and no changes or surprises. I doubt that's ever happened with any organization.

There's a good chance Mancini and Means are dealt for prospects soon between now and July. 

Your conclusion about Mountcastle is based on other players. I disagree with that. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position that he can play well, meaning a left fielder is more valuable than a first baseman. In other words, the O's won't say....well, even though Mountcastle is a better overall player as a left fielder than Santander, since we already have Santander there, we have to find an open spot for Mountcastle. 

I think they'll do the opposite. Mountcastle will play at the most valuable position he's able to play and the other guy will move. 

Richie Martin's destination will depend on whether the O's bring in someone between now and opening day who is better able to handle short. I happen to like Martin but I doubt anyone views him as a long term fixture. He's patching an obvious hole until someone else provides a better patch. And I don't see any circumstance where he would be held back in AAA in '21 to manipulate service time. He's not the profile for that in any way. 

And I believe in Diaz but he's anything but a sure thing and most definitely not a sure thing within the next year. 

As an example, 365 days ago, would you have made the same predictions about Martin, Santander, Diaz, Means, et al, that you do today? Things change. For better and for worse. 

Elias is not trading Means.  He is cheap,  he as good last year. and he eats innings.  A trade is not happening for Means this year.

Every rating I have seen on Mountcaslte say he is slow.   The outfield is probably not the best place for his skills.   1B is probably his best shot at playing a defensive position that may be positive to good along with his plus bat.

Not prospect is a sure thing.   Any of them can step in a hole and break a leg or be like  Mullins and not be able to hit a major league break pitch.  It happens.

You cut off the end on my post that says "This is if all goes well, which it will not."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

At least Mountcastle is a top 100 prospect.  You are talking about guys that aren't in the top 250   

Yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The O's are putting more technology, analysis and coaching into player development then we have every seen before.  I am hoping it actually helps players develop to higher levels of performance.

Agreed.

But don't players develop on different time frames? Isn't it reasonable to understand that some guys have more development needed and some guys less? 

I don't think it works to say "this guy had 12 AA starts in '19 so he'll be promoted to the O's on August 11, 2020". They'll be promoted when they've mastered changes and improvements as well as possible. Some will come quicker, some slower and some not at all. And some will get hurt. And some will hit a wall. 

I'd love to see Toby Welk rocket through the minors. I love that guy. But he wouldn't be first guy to tear it up in the low levels only to hit a wall at AA or AAA. I really hope he doesn't. But you never know, even with huge advances in player development. 

Even the great astros system had to go buy a right fielder cause they couldn't develop one. And now they'd be happy to give Reddick away but no one will take him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Elias is not trading Means.  He is cheap,  he as good last year. and he eats innings.  A trade is not happening for Means this year.

Every rating I have seen on Mountcaslte say he is slow.   The outfield is probably not the best place for his skills.   1B is probably his best shot at playing a defensive position that may be positive to good along with his plus bat.

Not prospect is a sure thing.   Any of them can step in a hole and break a leg or be like  Mullins and not be able to hit a major league break pitch.  It happens.

You cut off the end on my post that says "This is if all goes well, which it will not."

There are surprises, every year, good and bad, in every organization. 

2 years ago, would you have bet on Forrest Whitley or John Means? The yankees, with all their technology and brain power, wouldn't complete a trade with the Pirates for Gerrit Cole because they didn't believe he'd become what he has. Now look what they've paid to get him. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping for second half Baysox with Rutschman and Rodriguez joining Hall there.

With all due respect to the 4-15 section of the list, a next good team milestone will be getting those three together.

The Santander/Hays/Diaz/Mountcastle basket is akin to the Akin/Baumann/Kremer/Lowther basket - we won't go 8-for-8 but hopefully end up with 5-6 glue guys and not just a couple.  Then perhaps we earn a superstar's serious attention in 2-3 years to crescendo.  

There's a 99th percentile outcome where in mid-2022 the rotation is Rodriguez/Hall/Hancock/Rocker and Rutschman has a $200M companion in the heart of the lineup.  The team's depth fills in well or poorly with as many of the glue guys as the high minors group ends up on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Yet

Neither will have that chance, if they are good enough - they will pitch in Baltimore this year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, weams said:

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Ben McDonald.

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Sidney Ponson as well. 13 rWAR through 6 seasons and traded for a bunch of prospects to a contender.

Not to mention Zack Britton, Jake Arrieta, Brian Roberts, Jerry Hairston, Zach Davies, Josh Hader, BJ Ryan, Arthur Rhodes, Jose Mesa, Armando Benitez, Chris Hoiles, ...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Any team would be thrilled to develop a Sidney Ponson as well. 13 rWAR through 6 seasons and traded for a bunch of prospects to a contender.

Not to mention Zack Britton, Jake Arrieta, Brian Roberts, Jerry Hairston, Zach Davies, Josh Hader, BJ Ryan, Arthur Rhodes, Jose Mesa, Armando Benitez, Chris Hoiles, ...

Hoiles was in AA when we traded Fred Lynn for him.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, weams said:

Neither will have that chance, if they are good enough - they will pitch in Baltimore this year. 

Yep - part of what makes farm rankings so squishy and arbitrary.  That Austin Hays didn't play Game 162 doesn't change him at all, but it may bump our org rank some towards upper middle class.

In 2020 we'll have does Yusniel get 130 AB's and Baumann/Kremer 50 innings?  Baumann's initial assignment will give a clue.

To the extent I feel like 2020 has a little upside beyond 2019 at the major league level, it's in interesting pitchers making a bigger percentage of the starts.  This year we may nudge past the Wojo-style we need to purchase another team's AAA guy to make it through the year.

Next offseason probably figures to be Orioles Farm Peak, as 2020 pick 1-2 should profile ahead of Mountcastle, but then after that 2021 pick 1-X has Rutschman's shoes to fill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I'm not proclaiming him guilty of anything. My first post I said " If true boy was that a stupid thing to do." My second post I said " his alleged activity". Obviously evidence is scant at the moment and this might be something more in the lines of a clerical mistake or nothing at all.  
    • Lot of great points here. I agree and I'll wait for all the facts to come out. My guess the Orioles get a fine and this was used to be leverage the Astros situation for a sensational news story when things are quiet outside of the World Series that few actually care about.
    • Exactly. COVID restrictions really stopped the travel back and forth so it probably didn't make since to have Holt with the team and the minor leaguers. Either way, fraud is a really strong word to use and reeks of click bait by the NY Post.
    • That’s the thing, we have no idea when Holt was added to the coaches pension plan.  If it was when he was first hired in 2019 then it would seem more egregious, but if it was before this season as part of his promotion to Director of Pitching, then it seems more palatable, as his role was intended to blanket the majors & minors, and it sounds like the plan was for him to be in uniform on occasion, even if not once the game starts, since the number of coaches allowed during a game is limited. I just can’t see Elias potentially risking his career by covertly putting Holt in the coaches pension plan without getting approval from the Orioles HR department, or whoever is responsible for matters like this in the organization, along with MLB.  Elias is a smart guy, and only 2 years into what is likely his dream job as the GM of a Major League Baseball team.   I’m sure the other 3 coaches that were designated had to be approved as well, so if there was any issue with designating Holt as the 4th coach, you would think Elias and the O’s organization would have been told that when they first put him on the list of 4. To me, this article seems more like sensationalism, trying to tie Elias in with the Astros cheating scandal and making it seem like this situation with Holt is more of the same, as if anyone associated with the Astros must be deceptive and dishonest.  And the fact that they singled out Anthony Sanders as a coach that got  “screwed” seems like the lawsuit/claim of fraud could have come from his agent, because clearly this story was leaked by someone with an axe to grind.  But what if Holt was designated the 4th coach before Sanders got hired?  The point is, we don’t have all the facts, so to just assume Elias did this covertly to appease Holt without getting approval from anyone seems very irresponsible from a journalistic perspective.   Just the fact that this is being reported at all is obviously unsettling if you’re an O’s fan and a supporter of Elias, but I think this is more about sensationalism and click bait, by using the headline “Ex-Astros” and “fraud” to get people worked up about what is likely not much of anything.  It will be interesting to see if Elias or someone else with the organization talks about it and tries to clear it up, because you know that if he/they don’t, more and more people will start to wonder if this really could be a much more serious situation than it currently appears to be.
    • Yea, seems like an administrative issue with a potential fine at most. 
    • Remember when James Franklin was supposed to be the coach in waiting then wasn't? Lord almighty the MD decision makers for sports are awful.  BTW, Tagovailoa is awful. He looks scared, unprepared, inaccurate, and has really poor decision making skills. Good Lord, this is the guy who is the best they can find with all the transfers? Nice job there Locksley.
    • I am sorry but the word Fraud here is a little strong.  There are rules on which coaches can be listed to be eligible for the MLB pension and there maybe a question whether or not his role this past season qualifies or not.  I suspect the fact there were no minor leagues and the whole COVID situation may have changed what that role end up being probably is a factor.  To me fraud would be an intention to deceive what his role was, not whether it qualifies or not.  However in the world we live in today I guess it pays to use words like fraud. It makes the story more interesting. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...