Jump to content
weams

Iglesias signs with O's

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Roch has it right in his blog.   He just messed up the tweet.

Does Roch have a blog entry about the Elias conference call?   I don’t see it.   

Edit: odd, it wasn’t there when I first read your post, but now it is:  
https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/01/elias-on-iglesias-signing-and-its-impact-on-martin-and-club.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it looks as if Martin has a leg up over Wilkerson for a roster spot. Tony Reminded me that the main need for a utility guy is the ability to play short, and apparently Wilk  doesn’t. 

 If that’s true, we have two utility infielder‘s? Or a floater who can cover everything except short? If we also need a platoon partner for Alberto at second, it starts crunching the roster a little bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Philip said:

Well, it looks as if Martin has a leg up over Wilkerson for a roster spot. Tony Reminded me that the main need for a utility guy is the ability to play short, and apparently Wilk  doesn’t. 

 If that’s true, we have two utility infielder‘s? Or a floater who can cover everything except short? If we also need a platoon partner for Alberto at second, it starts crunching the roster a little bit.

Honestly and why shouldn't he? He's young and has defensive tools and better speed. Wilkerson had a few fun moments but I'm kinda over the guy as a player. I'd rather see different guys in his role who we haven't seen yet or see what Richie can do if he has a good spring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, interloper said:

Honestly and why shouldn't he? He's young and has defensive tools and better speed. Wilkerson had a few fun moments but I'm kinda over the guy as a player. I'd rather see different guys in his role who we haven't seen yet or see what Richie can do if he has a good spring.

 Oh, I don’t disagree with anything you said, and I like both players very much, I’m just kind of a fan of Wilkerson. Mike’s comments indicate that Martin going to AAA is not a fait accompli, so I’m wondering what the plan is for the roster. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, wildcard said:

Have there been any press reports of that?  Link?

https://www.prospectslive.com/mlb-draft/2019/12/4/mlb-2020-mock-draft-10

Everything is just somebody’s opinion at this point.  It does seem that Torkelson, Hancock and Austin Martin are always in the top 3 of the movks I have seen thus far though they are interchangeable in their slot number.   But we will get a premium prospect with our pick, for sure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

This reminds me of when we signed Cesar Izturis. In fact the contract is basically the same,

Iglesias is a much better hitter than Izturis was.  I guess this makes Richie Martin the new Luis Hernandez?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

...then why is is his OBP so pathetic? I'm not knocking him, but let's call a spade a spade. He's a great defensive player (which will be great for our young pitchers), but well below average offensively. To the point where if/when his defense slips a bit he's probably going to have a hard time finding a MLB job. He's perfect for this team but he's going to contribute little to nothing offensively and there's very little chance of him flipping him via trade. He's simply a cheap, affordable, stable defensive presence for us for the next two seasons. 

Doesn't that describe hundreds or even thousands of glove-first players throughout baseball history?  That's Mike Bordick or Rich Dauer.  Jerry Adair or Cesar Izturis.  It's Corey Patterson or Billy Gardner.

Anyway, he's not that bad of a hitter for a shortstop.  Since he got established in 2013 there are 111 players who've played 350+ games at short.  He's 75th of the 111 in OPS+.  JJ Hardy had a 82 OPS+ the last five years of his career, Iglesias has an 86.  Ryan Flaherty has a career mark of 72. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Doesn't that describe hundreds or even thousands of glove-first players throughout baseball history?  That's Mike Bordick or Rich Dauer.  Jerry Adair or Cesar Izturis.  It's Corey Patterson or Billy Gardner.

Anyway, he's not that bad of a hitter for a shortstop.  Since he got established in 2013 there are 111 players who've played 350+ games at short.  He's 75th of the 111 in OPS+.  JJ Hardy had a 82 OPS+ the last five years of his career, Iglesias has an 86.  Ryan Flaherty has a career mark of 72. 

Shortstop is pretty loaded right now. In another era, Iglesias would probably be much more valued. I'd guess-timate that 20 out of 30 teams have shortstops they're really happy with right now. 

Since 2013 (the year you mentioned), the league has seen the arrival of Francisco Lindor, Javier Baez, Gleyber Torres, Marcus Semien, Trevor Story,  Fernando Tatis Jr, Jorge Polanco, Willy Adames, Paul DeJong, Corey Seager, Trea Turner, Tim Anderson.

That's a boatload of talent; we're lucky to get to witness so many great shortstops at one time.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Philip said:

Well, it looks as if Martin has a leg up over Wilkerson for a roster spot. Tony Reminded me that the main need for a utility guy is the ability to play short, and apparently Wilk  doesn’t. 

 If that’s true, we have two utility infielder‘s? Or a floater who can cover everything except short? If we also need a platoon partner for Alberto at second, it starts crunching the roster a little bit.

I think the new 26-man roster makes the super-utility player a little less valuable, because teams can theoretically use that extra spot to carry one infield specialist and one outfield specialist. Of course, having a super-utility player allows you to carry another guy in the bullpen. 

One of the things I'm most excited for this year is to see how teams utilize that extra spot. Along with the minimum-batter rule for pitchers, I think it'll shake roster construction up in ways we'll be surprised by.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

I think the new 26-man roster makes the super-utility player a little less valuable, because teams can theoretically use that extra spot to carry one infield specialist and one outfield specialist. Of course, having a super-utility player allows you to carry another guy in the bullpen. 

One of the things I'm most excited for this year is to see how teams utilize that extra spot. Along with the minimum-batter rule for pitchers, I think it'll shake roster construction up in ways we'll be surprised by.

I hope it allows for a bit more Earl Weaver style platooning.  I miss that.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mr. Chewbacca Jr. said:

I think the new 26-man roster makes the super-utility player a little less valuable, because teams can theoretically use that extra spot to carry one infield specialist and one outfield specialist. Of course, having a super-utility player allows you to carry another guy in the bullpen. 

One of the things I'm most excited for this year is to see how teams utilize that extra spot. Along with the minimum-batter rule for pitchers, I think it'll shake roster construction up in ways we'll be surprised by.

I'm pretty excited for the 26 man. I'm not sure why I am exactly but it just adds a new wrinkle. More options is good for everybody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Roughly AA average talent level, wider spread in talent, and at least a few parks where the run context makes Coors Field look like Dodger Stadium.  But it's good to see Pie having success.
    • Rick, you're looking at the Forbes estimated value of the franchise - not the size of their markets. Forbes is famously not very reliable with those things. You're also ignoring Northern Virginia and DC itself as other large, wealthy communities. There's a huge gap between the Nationals and the Orioles.
    • I'm going against most everyone else. I think Detroit will surprise us and take Martin. Our picks; 2. Spencer Torkelson 30. Bryce Jarvis 39. Bobby Miller
    • 1. Austin Martin, 3B/OF, Vanderbilt, Age on draft day: 21 Martin may not be the first overall pick this year, but he’s the best overall prospect due to his combination of performance, athleticism and all-around quickness. There’s some Javy Báez to his hand speed, although unlike the young Báez, Martin rarely strikes out. We haven’t seen a top college prospect this athletic since George Springer in 2011, although before the draft Springer had the two-strike approach of a turnip. Martin punched out barely 10 percent of the time in 2019, and just twice in 69 plate appearances before baseball shut down in March. . He’s going to end up at a skill position — center, third, second, maybe shortstop if his arm is back to normal — and hit for average with developing power. That’s the kind of probability with upside you want at the first overall pick. 2. Spencer Torkelson, 1B, Arizona State, Age: 20 Torkelson hit everyone’s radar in the spring of 2018 when he hit 25 home runs as a freshman to lead all Division I hitters, then hit 7 more on the Cape that summer to finish one off the league lead. Torkelson is extremely strong, hitting for all this power with almost no stride and a two-handed finish that makes his swing almost short by comparison to most power hitters, and while he’s shown some swing-and-miss he’s also been willing to take walks, leading the country this spring before the shutdown. He’s a good enough athlete that he might be able to handle left field, although I’d bet on him spending most of his career at first base. ... but even if he’s a 50 hit/70 power guy in the end, that’s someone who hits fourth and makes a handful of All-Star teams. 3. Asa Lacy, LHP, Texas A&M, Age: 21 Lacy separated himself from the rest of this year’s very strong college pitching... , showing he could hold 93-94 mph deep into games, touching 98 mph, with a plus changeup and above-average slider. Lacy’s got a great starter’s build and his delivery works, with a big step-over stride and good timing. He works well to both sides of the plate, although his command and control are still inconsistent; the ability to reach back for 97-98 mph is great, but his stuff is good enough that he could just hold 92-93 mph all game and probably throw better strikes. If he’d had a full spring, and kept this up, more people would likely see him as a candidate to go 1-1. If there’s a future No. 1 starter in the class, I think it’s him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...