Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
OrioleDog

Mickey Tettleton - Sign and Trade

Recommended Posts

An enjoyable recent discovery has been a Team Year's transactions page on B-Ref.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/1991-transactions.shtml

I saw it was the Glenn Davis trade anniversary yesterday so browsed back at that whole offseason.  Apparently we retained Tettleton as a free agent on 12/19 before trading him on 1/11.  I had forgotten the immediacy of the Tettleton chaser compounding the Davis mistake, but I guess we needed to backfill those Schilling/Harnisch innings for the new slugger's team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how the Orioles would have done in the early/mid 90s if the Glenn Davis trade doesn't go down.

You keep Tettleton AND you've got Hoiles.

You still have Harnisch, Schilling, Finley.  I've always thought that Harnisch and Finley still go on to be valuable players and have good careers, I am not sure if Schilling stays in Baltimore that he goes on to reach the heights that he did.  I'm not sure why I've always thought that but it makes sense in my head.

The 1992 team, the first team in OPACY, won 89 games.  If you keep the vastly underrated Milligan at 1st base (.383 OBP), Hoiles at catcher and have Tettleton at DH instead of Davis, with Steve Finley in RF instead of Orsulak that's a better lineup.  And better outfield defense.  Devo, Brady, Finley....what an outfield.

As far as the staff goes, let's go with my idea that Harnisch (but not Schilling) goes on to do what he does but does it in an Orioles uniform.  If you swap out Milacki with Harnisch, that's way better.  

Had Schilling progressed in an Orioles uniform, you give those starts that you gave to Arthur Rhodes and Joe Table to Schilling and put Rhodes and Table in the bullpen.

The rotation would have been:

Mussina

McDonald

Harnisch

Sutcliffe

Schilling (and if Schilling doesn't progress, Rhodes still isn't bad).

That's a hell of a team.  That would have been a lot of fun.

The Glenn Davis trade, IMO, just sucked the life out of the organization to a certain degree.  And Mickey Tettleton was a player I loved whne I was young, it would have been great to have kept him in an Orioles uniform.

I always liked these two cards.  

 

51e9m3ioBRL._SY445_.jpg

 

a0fea67d7aad479d96a899978b1b1933_front.j

 

Mickey Tettleton always looked like a badass to me.  In that first photo, he looks like he wants to deck the umpire.  And with the eye black, he looks menacing.  In the 2nd photo, he's having a good time but the cheek full of chaw lets you know he's a serious ballplayer.

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/13/2020 at 10:51 AM, Moose Milligan said:

I wonder how the Orioles would have done in the early/mid 90s if the Glenn Davis trade doesn't go down.

You keep Tettleton AND you've got Hoiles.

You still have Harnisch, Schilling, Finley.  I've always thought that Harnisch and Finley still go on to be valuable players and have good careers, I am not sure if Schilling stays in Baltimore that he goes on to reach the heights that he did.  I'm not sure why I've always thought that but it makes sense in my head.

The 1992 team, the first team in OPACY, won 89 games.  If you keep the vastly underrated Milligan at 1st base (.383 OBP), Hoiles at catcher and have Tettleton at DH instead of Davis, with Steve Finley in RF instead of Orsulak that's a better lineup.  And better outfield defense.  Devo, Brady, Finley....what an outfield.

As far as the staff goes, let's go with my idea that Harnisch (but not Schilling) goes on to do what he does but does it in an Orioles uniform.  If you swap out Milacki with Harnisch, that's way better.  

Had Schilling progressed in an Orioles uniform, you give those starts that you gave to Arthur Rhodes and Joe Table to Schilling and put Rhodes and Table in the bullpen.

The rotation would have been:

Mussina

McDonald

Harnisch

Sutcliffe

Schilling (and if Schilling doesn't progress, Rhodes still isn't bad).

That's a hell of a team.  That would have been a lot of fun.

The Glenn Davis trade, IMO, just sucked the life out of the organization to a certain degree.  And Mickey Tettleton was a player I loved whne I was young, it would have been great to have kept him in an Orioles uniform.

 

Wow. I'm sick. I was so excited to get Davis. I remember thinking we had immediately turned ourselves into a contending team. Just the opposite, we were probably ready to become a contender and should have not made that deal. Sigh... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember reading, 90% sure in one of Bill James's historical abstracts, about Tettleton's career and how underestimated he was.  Teams didn't prize him, and whenever he went to a new team it got good.

The 1988-1990 Orioles won 54, 87 and 76.

The '90 Tigers won 79, then with him the 1991-1994 Tigers won 84, 75, 85 and went 53-62 in the strike year.

The '94 Rangers were 52-62 in the strike year, then the 1995 Rangers were 74-70 in the abbreviated season with a World Series, and got Johnny Oates a division title with 90 wins in 1996, Tettleton's last year as a regular.

That's some effect, but not as clear as I guessed it might be - fair chance of fuzzy memory.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Tettleton trade was one of the worst in team history but has been overshadowed by the trade for Davis. They traded a switch-hitting catcher with power for a pitcher recovering from arm problems.

OBP wasn't valued as much then -- Tettleton walked a lot and was way more valuable than what they got for him.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Not to mention the nearly infinite period of time he'll be eligible for some form of Vet's Committee to select him.  Deacon White died in 1939 and was inducted into the Hall in 2013.  That would be like inducting Altuve in the year 2156.
    • As has Velazquez.   And Velazquez is on the 40, Stevie isn't.
    • I still think we'll be improved.   Offense:  improved [relative to the league average that is, if they un-juice the balls a bit we could score the same # of runs but be improved] Defense:  Improved (SS, CF -- two of the most important positions) Bullpen:  Improved (pretty much have to be, we were nearly historically bad last year, even with regression to the mean we improve, and we will have Harvey for a full season) Starting:   Probably worse Division competition:  Yankees as good or better than 2019;  Tampa about the same;  Red Sox quite a bit worse; Jays better -- it's pretty much a push Interleague competition:  We still play the Nats as always; but otherwise we play the NL Central instead of the NL West last year.   NLC lacks a dominant team and has a potentially very bad Pirate team;  NL West last year had a great Dodger team and a couple other competitive teams, but a bad Giant team.   I think we get a tiny bit easier schedule here but not very significant. So I see only one factor -- albeit a really big one in starting pitching -- where we will be worse this year. So I'm going to say we have a better record than last year's 54-108.   The question to me is how much better?   I'd love to see us avoid 100 losses.
    • Rose didn't cheat, he bet on baseball games that he was involved in.  Cheating is being dishonest to gain an advantage.  Rose was breaking the rules for his own personal gain.  Making decisions based on bets usually is detrimental to the team, either in the short or long term.
    • Wouldn’t that give Wilkerson a leg up? He had considerable playing time everywhere.
    • You have Milone Hess and Scott. I have Stewart, Shepherd and Fry( I also have Smith not making the team. Despite losing10 pounds, I don’t see how that’s going to make him a better player.) I appreciate that you’re actually there watching the guys, so can you go into some detail about your choices?  Specifically, regarding Scott? His problem is that he walks too many guys, and his comments seem to indicate that he doesn’t see it as a mechanical problem, but as a mental one. Attitude does count for a whole lot, but sometimes the attitude can influence us to deny any other problems.
    • There are about 150 or so Hall of Fame position players.  Through Altuve's age (29) the median WAR value of those players is about 37.  Altuve's career to date has been worth 38 wins.  There have been 74 players with 35-41 wins through age 29.  About 12 are still active, with a handful of others retired but not yet HOF eligible.  Of the remaining 60 or so about 28 are in the Hall.  So I'd say just on merit he has a better than even chance of eventually going in.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...