Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wildcard

Is Mouncastle as good a hitter as Mancini was prior to his rookie year?

Recommended Posts

Forget the defense for a minute.   Mancini had a 775 OPS at AAA prior to his rookie year.   Mountcastle had a 871 OPS at  AAA.   But the ball was different.   Do you think we can expect Mountcastle to hit as well has Mancini did his rookie year?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest difference between the hitters, IMO, is just approach. Mancini has a good approach at the plate and he's addressed specific things about his approach/swing to become a very good ML hitter.

Mountcastle I think has more pure hitter skills. Will they be enough to overcome his approach issues? A lot of smart people think so, so that's great. But if he struggles in his first year or two, I don't think that's going to be all that surprising. Nor will it speak that poorly of him as a player. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, interloper said:

The biggest difference between the hitters, IMO, is just approach. Mancini has a good approach at the plate and he's addressed specific things about his approach/swing to become a very good ML hitter.

Mountcastle I think has more pure hitter skills. Will they be enough to overcome his approach issues? A lot of smart people think so, so that's great. But if he struggles in his first year or two, I don't think that's going to be all that surprising. Nor will it speak that poorly of him as a player. 

But if he makes one bad thrown from left the jury will convict.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But if he makes one bad thrown from left the jury will convict.

Yep. If you ain’t plus defensively you’re a DH around these parts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

But if he makes one bad thrown from left the jury will convict.

I'm really interested to see how he looks out there in ST. It can't be any worse than DSJ, but I'm guessing it might not be as good as Santander, who I thought improved a lot defensively last year. 

Either way, if he slugs, who cares. Which is sorta how I feel about Mancini playing OF, who I seem to recall you convict on the regular as an OFer. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No because Mancini's approach at the plate and plate discipline improved at every level as he advanced through the minors. In his last full season in the minors, Mancini actually had a respectable 9.5 BB%. I bet Mountcastle's walk to strikeout ratio would resemble rookie year Jonathan Schoop if he played an entire season next year in the majors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Section84 said:

Can someone please remind me what Buck's issues was with Mountcastle in ST a few years back?  Was it a cockiness issue?

It was his lack of plate discipline which is pretty laughable given how little he said about Schoop and Jones having the same issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Forget the defense for a minute.   Mancini had a 775 OPS at AAA prior to his rookie year.   Mountcastle had a 871 OPS at  AAA.   But the ball was different.   Do you think we can expect Mountcastle to hit as well has Mancini did his rookie year?

Mountcastle Age 22 season - AAA .871 OPS

Trey Mancini Age 22 season - A/A+ .735 OPS

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But if he makes one bad thrown from left the jury will convict.

Let's see if he can get the ball back into the infield.  Or hit a cutoff man.  

One step at a time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Let's see if he can get the ball back into the infield.  Or hit a cutoff man.  

One step at a time.

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've attended a lot of Keys games the last ten years.  Mountcastle is the best hitter I've seen there.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • MLB doesn't think so.  The Orioles are awarded a competitive balance pick every year.
    • Its will be a  lot easier for the O's to add a quality FA bat than a quality FA pitcher IMO Nationals market is much bigger than the O's market.  On a normal business day you can't even get to Camden Yards from Northern Virginia for a 7 pm game unless you are willing to spend 2 plus hours in bumper to bumper traffic.  Believe me, I have tried. Its a major deterrent.  And its exhausting.
    • Baltimore is mid market team, as the Nationals are. If the Orioles had a strong team, and was that one piece away, then I see them being bale to add 6/155, hell, they added Davis, didnt they. While it was money foolishly spent, it was spent. I see Elias wanting to build this team for the long haul, and once they get a solid core going, then spend the money for quality FAs to complete the roster. IMO  
    • While I understand the history of developing pitching both in Baltimore and elsewhere,  I think its important for the O's to draft and develop pitching more than most teams for several reasons. 1) Baltimore is not the 3th largest market in the country like Chicago or the 4th largest like Houston.  The O's fan base is limited by Washington to the south and Philadelphia to the north.   That limits the amount of revenue they will have for veteran pitching.    It seens unlike that they will spend 6/155m or a Lester type, Verlander or Scherzer.  2) Not only is there a limit to the funds the O's will have to spend, but also Camden Yard is a place most free agent pitchers will avoid if possible.   Couple the limited funds with the Park and there is double the reasons for quality FA pitching to go elsewhere; 3) Elias know all this.  That is why he has beefed up his player development staff. Boosted his Analytics Department and paid to bring Holt in to lead the development of the pitchers in  the minors and the majors.  There is a lot more pitching development staff than in the past.  Elias is gear up to develop  players and pitchers have lead that development in the last year. Might the O's add some veteran pitching when they are ready to contend? Sure.   But that its probably  not basis for Elias contention plan.  Developing pitchers is a key part of the plan.  Adding quality pitching prospects is a big part of that plan.   After not adding a pitcher until the 8th round in last years draft and with this years draft being more pitching rich,  I think we will see Elias add pitchers in this draft whether it is the #2, #30, #39 picks after that.
    • “One of the most talented bats in this draft, the always hitting Nick Gonzales is a top prospect in 2020. After going on one of the craziest runs in college baseball of the past three years, Gonzales has shown the bat isn’t just boosted by Amateur Coors (Presley Askew Field) as shown in an outstanding summer on the Cape. Gonzales has excellent bat control and finds the barrel easy with raw power that shines. Although some questions remain for his legitimacy to be more than just a line drive hitter at the professional level. Gonzales has a very good sense of the strike zone, with a 45/30 BB/K last year. Although he has improved in that area and New Mexico State played him in short stop this year, Gonzales still gives up some defensive errors here and there. The arm isn’t quite strong enough to play elsewhere than second base but the bat more than makes up for it. Some questions still show up about Gonzales’ physical ceiling as he is pretty well built already at 5’10” 190, adding on to the question of if Gonzales is better suited as a gap-to-gap hitter at the next level. Regardless, Gonzales is a very talented player and can become a very useful player at the professional level.””
    • https://www.prospectslive.com/lists/2020/5/27/top-101-mlb-draft-player-rankings
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...