Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Tony-OH

Baseball Savant Infield Outs above average explained

Recommended Posts

If Martin was -5,  and Iglesias is +12, is it possible to translate that, at least approximately, into wins? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Philip said:

If Martin was -5,  and Iglesias is +12, is it possible to translate that, at least approximately, into wins? 

 

For me personally, I find the "wins" metric to be a flawwed. Even WAR doesn't really mean you will win "x" amount of games more or less. This is why defensive metrics have traditionally used runs saved, but I've never been convinced that it very accurately depicts actual runs saved.

I believe OAA is just a way to see whether players are better or worse then average compared to their peers. I like the percentile metric to give you an idea where they stand against their peers, however it doesn't necessarily tell you  how much a 9th percentile SS hurts you vs a 60th percentile SS.

I also like using the success rate added to see the real impact. If they have a -5% success rate added, that means they would get 5% less outs than an average fielder at his position. Over 100 chances that's 5 outs.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Tony-OH

Fair enough, so that means that Martin is bad, but we don’t know how much his badness cost us.

 I’m actually surprised at how disappointed I am to learn that Martin was one of the worst. 

Did they do historical rankings?? I was always a huge fan of buddy Bell and of course Adrian Beltre is never to be replaced, and we had a couple of pretty good guys too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Philip said:

If Martin was -5,  and Iglesias is +12, is it possible to translate that, at least approximately, into wins? 

 

I will give you a different answer than Tony, but it’s based on theory more than actual game observations.   

First, you need to recognize that Iglesias played a lot more games than Martin.    He played 1169 innings at short compared to Martin’s 785, about 50% more innings.    So if you assumed Martin’s time was increased to Iglesias’ level, his -5 becomes -7 or -8.    Let’s be generous and call it -7.    That makes the difference between Iglesias and Martin 19 outs.

Calculations done for other defensive metrics show that on average one out equates to .6 runs.    That average is calculated by running some math on every base/out state, and looking at the frequency of how often they occur, and doing a weighted average.    In other words, making a tough play with the bases loaded and two outs has a different impact on runs scored than making that same play with two out and nobody on base.    But when you look at the weighted average of all situations, the impact of making vs. failing to make an out is roughly .6 runs.    So, 19 outs equals 11-12 runs.

Finally, as a general rule, 10 runs greater or fewer over a season leads to one more or fewer win.    Again, that’s an average.    Depending on exactly when those runs were prevented or allowed, the impact could be much greater.    But applying that average, the difference between Iglesias and Martin should lead to about one extra win.    Obviously, the reality could be different depending on the game situations when these plays occur.    There are times where one play decides the outcome of the game, and other times where the play has no influence on the outcome whatsoever.    

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I will give you a different answer than Tony, but it’s based on theory more than actual game observations.   

First, you need to recognize that Iglesias played a lot more games than Martin.    He played 1169 innings at short compared to Martin’s 785, about 50% more innings.    So if you assumed Martin’s time was increased to Iglesias’ level, his -5 becomes -7 or -8.    Let’s be generous and call it -7.    That makes the difference between Iglesias and Martin 19 outs.

Calculations done for other defensive metrics show that on average one out equates to .6 runs.    That average is calculated by running some math on every base/out state, and looking at the frequency of how often they occur, and doing a weighted average.    In other words, making a tough play with the bases loaded and two outs has a different impact on runs scored than making that same play with two out and nobody on base.    But when you look at the weighted average of all situations, the impact of making vs. failing to make an out is roughly .6 runs.    So, 19 outs equals 11-12 runs.

Finally, as a general rule, 10 runs greater or fewer over a season leads to one more or fewer win.    Again, that’s an average.    Depending on exactly when those runs were prevented or allowed, the impact could be much greater.    But applying that average, the difference between Iglesias and Martin should lead to about one extra win.    Obviously, the reality could be different depending on the game situations when these plays occur.    There are times where one play decides the outcome of the game, and other times where the play has no influence on the outcome whatsoever.    

I'm not a mathematician, so I can't back my opinion up on this, but .6 runs per out seems extremely high to me.  My common sense tells me that there isn't an average of 1.8 runs scored every half inning, even with juiced up balls.  Again, I have no training or experience in this field at all, but it just looks way off to my simple mind.  Can you explain this to me in terms that I can understand?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Number5 said:

I'm not a mathematician, so I can't back my opinion up on this, but .6 runs per out seems extremely high to me.  My common sense tells me that there isn't an average of 1.8 runs scored every half inning, even with juiced up balls.  Again, I have no training or experience in this field at all, but it just looks way off to my simple mind.  Can you explain this to me in terms that I can understand?

How much would scoring increase if it was four outs per inning? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Number5 said:

I have no idea.

I don't either but I bet it would be significant.

Stuff like this I like to just assume that the guys that like crunching numbers did it correctly or the other guys that like crunching numbers would have corrected them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't either but I bet it would be significant.

Stuff like this I like to just assume that the guys that like crunching numbers did it correctly or the other guys that like crunching numbers would have corrected them.

I hear ya, but that just seems way too high to me.  Seems like .6 runs would be closer to the number for the entire half inning, not one out.  That would be 5.4 runs per team per game by simple math ( 9 X .6.)  I'm sure the formula that whoever came up with .6 runs per out came up with is far more complex than that.  I've found in life that there are times that more complex isn't always better.  It would be nice to at least be given a reasonable explanation of how they arrived at the number and a reason that the actual number of runs scored versus outs made would be an incorrect way to do it.  Again, I'm no mathematician, but I do like to be able to at least have something make some kind of sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/16/2020 at 11:08 AM, Number5 said:

I'm not a mathematician, so I can't back my opinion up on this, but .6 runs per out seems extremely high to me.  My common sense tells me that there isn't an average of 1.8 runs scored every half inning, even with juiced up balls.  Again, I have no training or experience in this field at all, but it just looks way off to my simple mind.  Can you explain this to me in terms that I can understand?

I know it seems counterintuitive, since there are 27 outs in a game and only 4-5 runs scored on average, so that seems like more like .2 runs per out.   

But have a look at this base-out matrix, which shows the expected number of runs scored in an inning depending on which bases are occupied and how many outs there are.   This matrix is based on actual game data, not theory.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/thebaseballscholar.com/2017/08/14/sabermetrics-101-re24/amp/

Let’s take the simplest example, the leadoff batter.    If he grounds out (so now it’s bases empty, one out), the expected runs in the inning are .243.    If he’s safe at first (so runner on first, nobody out), the expected runs are .831.    So, the increase in expected runs between making that play or not is .590.     

There are other situations on the chart where the differential is higher or lower than that.    On the high side, let’s say you’ve got runners on 1st and 2nd and one out.    Make a play there to record an out and hold the runners, and the expected runs are only .343.    Fail to make that play and so it’s bases loaded and only one out, and the expected runs increase to 1.520.

Anyway, someone did a weighted average of all these scenarios and came up with .6 for an average.    If I remember correctly.   
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was curious how much of baseball OAA might hint is fielding, so spreadsheeted the last 3 years for which Savant has published both IF and OF.

The Astros were 1st at +71

The Orioles were 30th at -103

So 174 outs at the estimated 0.6 runs/out gives 104 runs, suggesting ~35 runs/season defensive difference between the best and worst teams.

Across the 3-years, the Astros outscored their opponents by 739 runs and the Orioles were outscored by 620.  104/1359 gives 7.5%, leaving 92.5% for batting, pitching and catcher defense.

The Astros especially lorded over the AL here - Brewers, Reds, Cubs, Diamondbacks, Braves and Rockies were the next six.  Angels got AL second place at +31, and the third place AL finishers were down at +17.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

I was curious how much of baseball OAA might hint is fielding, so spreadsheeted the last 3 years for which Savant has published both IF and OF.

The Astros were 1st at +71

The Orioles were 30th at -103

So 174 outs at the estimated 0.6 runs/out gives 104 runs, suggesting ~35 runs/season defensive difference between the best and worst teams.

Across the 3-years, the Astros outscored their opponents by 739 runs and the Orioles were outscored by 620.  104/1359 gives 7.5%, leaving 92.5% for batting, pitching and catcher defense.

The Astros especially lorded over the AL here - Brewers, Reds, Cubs, Diamondbacks, Braves and Rockies were the next six.  Angels got AL second place at +31, and the third place AL finishers were down at +17.

As you note, OAA doesn’t account for catcher defense.    It also doesn’t account for certain elements of outfield defense, i.e. cutting off balls in the gap/down the lines or throwing. Outfield OAA relates purely to how many balls get caught.    So, you can probably assume that the difference between the best and worst defensive teams is greater than 35 runs.   By Fangraphs’ reckoning, it’s more like 75 runs (about 15-20 of which is catcher framing).    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I grew up in upstate New York but have been an Oriole fan since I was about seven years old.  There weren’t a lot of other Oriole fans in the area. The highlight of my ballplaying career came between my junior and senior years in high school, while I was attending a summer program at Cornell University.  A couple of intramural softball games were organized for the summer students, with the teams organized according to the dorms in which we lived. Before the first game, the captain asked what position everyone would like to play.  I said I’d prefer first base, but another fellow also said he’d prefer first base.  Turned out he was the All-Star first baseman for his high school league in Maryland.  I couldn’t match those credentials, so the captain put me at second base.  I’d never played much second base, but at least I had some idea of the fundamental things a second baseman should do. There came a situation where the other team had a runner on first with one out and a weak hitter at the plate.  The hitter swung and produced a dinky little popup in front of the plate, not very high.  The pitcher charged in, the catcher charged out, and I realized there was a possibility that they could collide and the ball could drop.  But I also realized that the runner couldn’t leave first until he saw whether the ball was going to be caught or not.  I moved to cover second, because if the ball was dropped, we could still have a chance for a force play. The pitcher and catcher collided and the ball dropped.  The runner started from first and I hollered “Second!  Second!” The pitcher heard me, grabbed the ball, and made a hurried throw.  The throw was on line and in plenty of time, but it was low, and I could see it was going to get to me on the short hop. I got down on one knee, so that if I didn’t catch the ball, I could at least block it and keep it on the infield.  But I kept my toe on the base in case I did catch it. Well, I caught it.  The runner was out. The pitcher and catcher congratulated me on a good play.  So did the third baseman and shortstop.  But the compliment I will always treasure came from the first baseman – the guy from Maryland. He looked at me and said, “Man – you played that one like an Oriole.”
    • https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/what-we-know-about-the-mlb-mlbpa-agreement-for-the-2020-season/
    • I assume the players will only get paid for the games they end of playing if any.  If a player has a 3 year contract and they only play a half a season do they just lose that half of season?  If they don't play at all and have a 3 year deal do they have 2 years or 3 years left?  Does a player have to wait the extra year to become a free agent or reach arbitration? 
    • One thing I've noticed is that a lot of plays at the plate are skipped, especially if the runner is out. 
    • Continuing with the 2019 Ironbirds season, I’m following along and so far they are 3-2 preparing to finish out the series at home against Tri-Cities before heading to Hudson Valley.  Ryan Conroy starts again and on the games first pitch he gets hit for a long double to left.  Bouncing back immediately he gets a K  on a split to infielder Deury Carrasco. He ended up giving up a single run in the first.  The bottom of the inning made it seem like this would be the Birds’ night as runs were even easier.  After a Joey Ortiz walk, Jean Carmona went opposite field to left for a double that set up the Birds with guys in scoring position.  Alex Murphy didn’t have a good AB, but catcher Korey Lee couldn’t hold righty starter Jayson Schroeder’s offerings and two passed balls led to two runs.  After an inning it’s 2-1 Aberdeen. The second starts with Carmona on a full spring into short right center to catch a sinking liner.  A true web gem and a very difficult play to make.  His speed got him close to being in position for this tough play as he cut Johnny Rizer’s angle and ran toward the big guy to make the play.  Awesome grab.  I wrote holy s!  Next play, was even stranger as a loner hit first base before bouncing up and waiting in midair for Juan Montes to glove it and tag the runner slickly.  After a pair of Conroy walks, he gives up a single but it’s run-free as Dalton Hoiles absolutely pegs Hector Martinez.  Nice arm on that Hoiles guy huh..... I loved to see the D on display, despite the pitching needing it, and although the Birds did make it easy and  run away scoring 12.  The highlight of the game was broadcaster Michael Lehr’s chat in-studio with Mike Elias.  He loved the progress of the pitchers under Chris Holt who he proudly brought over from Houston. Randomly he said that Holt has innate abilities to see and correct problems that guys don’t even realize they have like Dallas Litscher getting more break on his curve by adjusting his fingers.  Holt saw it and adjusted it according to Elias.  The entire organization getting on the same page as far as development is huge for Elias and at this time (June 2019) that’s his top priority.  Interestingly enough, Tri City is an Astros affiliate and Elias scouted and drafted most of the players on both squads.   An offensive explosion took place while Elias was talking and I saw Carmona drag a bunt to first that he had wrapped up after 3-4 steps.....he can absolutely burn that baseline!  What a way to impress the boss.  They put up 4 in the inning and got to 6 before adding 6 more later to cover up some less than good pitching from Conroy and Yelin Rodriguez who followed him.  A since released arm Parker McFadden and GCL reliever Jose Alejandro both had one of a pair of Aberdeen appearances respectively to finish up.  I liked Elias talking about the system and his ability to scout more than the game.  But I can’t leave out 3B Toby Welk bringing his average up to a nice .364 with a 2-5 and 2RBI.     Next game featured Kevin Macgee starting and it was a boring loss.  There was not many times where I grabbed my pad and thought, ‘note this’. Actually there were none, but I did like to see reliever Jason Montville bounce back with a damn good performance; 4.2 IP, 5 hits, 6 K’s.  It made me look a bit more into this pitcher that I liked so much from the GCL.  I discovered something about him and the Orioles that definitely stood out.  Montville’s college in California called St. Katherine’s is a tiny private school who only has a few hundred students.  The athletics participate in the  National Christian Collegiate Athletics Association and the baseball team’s coaching staff features Tom Brunansky and Doug Stange.  There’s been 3 years of baseball at St Kat’s and they’ve had 4 total players go pro.  Montville, Tucker Baca, John Ryan and Dallas Litscher.  The Orioles must like what they see out there, at least a little.   So I skipped to the opener of the series at Hudson Valley and was pleasantly surprised by different broadcasters and lots more angles, even replay!  The Ironbirds enter at 4-3 and the starters are Litscher against Rodolfo Sanchez.  The game’s first pitch is laced under SS by Clay Fisher and 3B Irving Ortega popped in next to whack an RBI triple. A sac fly by 1B Ian Evans gets them another run and the frame closes out with Aberdeen starting out up 2-0.   Litscher takes the mound and is working so fast he looks out of rhythm.  Speedster Greg Jones sees some inside heat to get to 2-2 from 2-0, but Litscher misses afterwards walking him.  He gets out of the inning and the Ironbirds add on again in the second as 2B Andrew Fregia knocks in Jaylen Ferguson with a double to deep left.  After an inning and a half, the Ironbirds are up 3-0 and should be feeling good.   I’ve waited to see some tension or adversity strike his team early and this game is where they started being tested.  Manager Kevin Bradshaw, who I’m growing to like even more than I already did (a lot) came out of he dugout in this game 3 times to either fight for a player or tell the ump they were wrong and each time, the vice grip of game pressure was a bit tighter. Litscher was so much slower by the 4th inning he had NO rhythm and had already had a 3rd where he gave up a pair of singles and a walk, mixing in a WP for an earned run.  Dallas has a pair of pitches from my perspective, a straight one and a breaking one that snaps in to righties.  He hit his spots a bit (46-76 strikes)but couldn’t finish guys off and couldn’t escape some bad 3-ball counts.  It wasn’t an inspiring performance but all that being said he only gave up 3 runs in 5 innings despite his 6 traditional base runners and 3 total wild pitches plus a hit batter.  Rodolfo Sanchez, the starter for the Rays affiliate was locating his curveball for strikes to righties with ease and did it to start and finish counts. He located much better with breaking stuff than heat tonight, I was a little impressed.  After a walk in the fifth, Irving Ortega looks shot out of a cannon as he gets to third on an Ian Evans single and I like Ortega’s fiery attitude.....a lot!  What a pleasant surprise.  Bottom 5 and Litscher looks much better but he’s forced to get 4 outs after catcher Luke Ringofer can’t get the wild strike 3 in his grip to throw out Greg Jones after the K.  More adversity to follow as reliever Felix Bautista brought his worst to the bump next.  It’s a 3-3 tie in the 6th and as the game tightens up, Bautista walks the leadoff hitter.  The pitches didn’t seem close but Irving Ortega was seen yelling at the ump to look closer.  Bautista looks affected and throws up a meatball that corner Jacson Macgowan belts into right.  Two on, no out, bad start to the 6th.   Bautista bounces back to get a swinging strikeout next to catcher John Embry.  Confidence as he started him off with a big curve.  Maybe too much confidence on display as the first pitch to the next batter Hill Alexander featured a double steal.  With a pair of runners in scoring position Bautista gave up a poorly timed double that should have plated a pair but for an outstanding Andrew Fregia relay started by RF Tristan Graham that pegged Macgowan at home.  Really great turn and fire shown by Fregia, the camera even caught the whip of the ball in the air.  Perfect toss.  Bautista averted disaster there and gets the next hitter to ground out, finishing up down by a run, 4-3.  Highlights later include Clay Fisher getting picked off 1st by a lefty but somehow beating a bad throw to second and Kevin Bradshaw coming out to argue on behalf of runner Juan Montes being ‘tagged’ behind the back passing first.  Felix Bautista in the 8th inning had a sequence where he threw a pair of wild pitches, needed to be calmed by catcher Lenin Rodriguez twice, Ortega once and took 1:24 seconds between pitches before taking even longer the next one.  He gave up only one, making it 5-3 but his body language and actions needed to be better.  I’m eager to see what happened to him after this because it was a terrible performance for a guy with some decent stuff and a bit of experience too.  Late in the 9th, the Birds rallied to get one and maybe extend the game, but Andrew Gross finally shut the door on them.  The player of the game was lefty relief pitcher Steffon Moore and he got 7 outs in between Rodolfo and Gross, all on K’s.   I have a feeling that after this game the team was dressed down and ripped to shreds.  The performance left a lot to be desired, although could have been worse.  The skipper and several players were frustrated and whatever standard they needed to play to, through 8 games and 4 wins had only been partially met.  I have lots of info on Bradshaw from watching him and he is unquestionably a difference maker and gap filler in terms of development.  I can’t wait to see him manage this team to success knowing how hands on an and active he’s going to be at camp.  This is a loud and proud leader and one who knows his experience is a wonderful asset in terms of education.  He also has some serious funk on BP pitches but can groove them on a line for dozens of throws in a row.  Bradshaw can be heard in so many of my videos cheering on both players and instructors and now that I know his M.O. I want to see him run the game as much as his roster plays it out. In any event, they’re 4-4 and probably should be a game better.  I’ll keep watching and let you know what there is to see as they continue the 3 game weekend set at Hudson Valley.
    • You know I don't think that idea is that horrible.  It would be easier to gear up pitchers to a 5 inning game.  Sure this season and everything involved will be an outlier forever. There is nothing that can be done now to change that.  
    • Are we making any inroads so to speak? I see we are in the final 5.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...