I looked at three writeups and don't see any that say are TOR starters or that they are highly likely to become TOR starters. You are the one advocated that they could be TOR starters because of their draft position. Most write-ups point out what they need to improve upon to become a TOR.
I like Martin and Lacy. I would not have a problem with the Os drafting either.
I think the logic you have used to repeatedly downgrade Martin (esp in light of a significant majority of rating services, including sources you quote, that rate Martin higher) while latching onto best case scenario upside for any pitcher taken 1:2 is poor.
I picked Torkelson mostly because I think that's the safe pick but I'm still undecided. I would not be upset with Martin, I think the risk there is maybe you end up with a Dansby Swanson type who can't play shortstop.
I thought the David Price contract was risky.
So far, 4 years and 10.5 WAR for the money is probably 50-50 on value. given his 2.6 and 4.2 WAR years and his off years, is still productive, just not 30 mill worth.