Jump to content
Greg Pappas

Poll: Grading Elias' Tenure Thus Far

How would you grade Elias' tenure thus far?  

127 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you grade Elias' tenure thus far?



Recommended Posts

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

There are very clear differences than before.  Most notably, that in 1998-2011 and even after that they never actually rebuilt.  They never started to rebuild.  The closest they came was trading Erik Bedard.  Today they're clearly tearing it down with the intent of changing their fundamental philosophy and rebuilding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

The more I think about it they all get an F. From Ownership down. 

I'm curious as to what a non-failing grade would look like for a GM who inherited a 47-win team with a bottom-five farm system.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

The more I think about it they all get an F. From Ownership down. 

What would've garnered an A in your book? The previous regime left the O's in as bad a condition you could possibly leave it. It's bizarre to me that he doesn't even get a C for building up an analytics department from basically nothing as well as an actually functionally international scouting presence. These are things that even the bad franchises had and the Os did not.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Satyr3206 said:

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

You're basing your grade of Elias in part on "the MASN issue"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Addition by a lot of subtraction.  I cant give him a grade until I see him add some talent to this organization in some form other than the 1st overall pick.

Solid incomplete for me.  Too early to grade draft.  No remarkable trades.  No additions of meaning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/1/2020 at 9:39 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

There are very clear differences than before.  Most notably, that in 1998-2011 and even after that they never actually rebuilt.  They never started to rebuild.  The closest they came was trading Erik Bedard.  Today they're clearly tearing it down with the intent of changing their fundamental philosophy and rebuilding. 

On the drafting and player side I might agree. On the Ownership and business side I totally disagree. If you want to move a Franchise forward you have to address all issues. There are numerous things with the Orioles that haven't been addressed. The common denominator is the Owners. If you want to run a ML Team then ask the hard questions and get authority to deal with the problems.Elias should have asked these questions and gotten authority to handle them.  With the Orioles no one ever gets this authority and things drag out for years and years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/1/2020 at 9:43 AM, LTO's said:

What would've garnered an A in your book? The previous regime left the O's in as bad a condition you could possibly leave it. It's bizarre to me that he doesn't even get a C for building up an analytics department from basically nothing as well as an actually functionally international scouting presence. These are things that even the bad franchises had and the Os did not.

In my life the Hoffberger/ Cashen team. The Atlanta Braves during the 90's. Hank Peters was a good GM hamstrung by Ownership.Oh and btw Analytics are nothing but stats. You can not build a Franchise based solely on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

In my life the Hoffberger/ Cashen team. The Atlanta Braves during the 90's. Hank Peters was a good GM hamstrung by Ownership.Oh and btw Analytics are nothing but stats. You can not build a Franchise based solely on that.

I forgot Branch Rickey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's like giving the President or the Governor a poor grade because a hurricane happened.

What if the Governor or President does a poor job handling the hurricane?  Should we just shrug it off?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What if the Governor or President does a poor job handling the hurricane?  Should we just shrug it off?

What exactly should Elias be doing to handle the MASN situation?  Should he be taking night school law classes to go inject himself into the legal process?  Should he be going on undercover missions to DC to try to get the Nats to give up their case?  This is an issue that has nothing to do with Elias' area of responsibility.  If it turns out in the O's favor and you give him a gold star for it, you're giving gold stars to the rooster for making the sun come up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Lamar has at times been awful outside the hash marks yes, and certainly leaves a lot to be desired there. I too have my doubts as to how much he’ll be able to improve in that facet of his game. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t. But it’s abundantly clear to everyone except you that the passing game, particularly outside the numbers, has got to improve for us to win a championship. It’s just the way the league is now. And being that Lamar is going to be our QB for quite some time, the only way to improve said passing game is by infusing it with more pass catchers who can create separation and/or present mismatches, and/or beat press coverage. And Because of the perception of Lamar and our scheme that you eloquently highlighted in your post, it will be difficult to attract those pass catchers via free agency, leaving the draft as the best and perhaps only means of acquiring them. So I say address the pass rush and the o-line via free agency and spend a first rounder on a potentially elite target for Lamar. I like Pitts because he can do all of the things I mentioned above that will help keep defenses honest and keep the middle of the field less crowded for Lamar and the running backs. All pretty basic logic. 
    • They are going to keep expanding the passing game.  They have said this.  Part of the reason they haven’t is the lack of weapons.     I don’t think they get Pitts at 13 but if he was at 13, they would take him, for sure.   Just as they would take one of Waddle, Chase or Smith if they fell. And they certainly could trade down but they also could trade up some as well, if a weapon fell that they wanted. Tons of options but it’s very clear that adding more weapons for Lamar is on the agenda.
    • o   Actually, I did not know that. I only went there one time, when my cousin Donnie took me to see an Orioles/Yankees game in April of 1979. I knew about Wild Bill Hagy and Leonard "Big Wheel" Burrier (the Colts super fan), and that it was known as "The Asylum on 33rd Street." I also knew about the row of white houses that were situated directly in back of the stadium behind center-field, which some opposing hitters claimed gave Jim Palmer an extra advantage because his overhand delivery of the white baseball often blended in with those white houses ...... but I didn't know about the acoustics of the stadium making it louder. Thanks for the info.   o
    • How is it wrong ?    wait and see who they’d add off the scrap heap or draft! They won’t even sniff Pitts is they get the #13. They will trade back for additional picks as they should and fix the line.    They aren’t going to throw anymore than marginally more ....period!    You saying it’s wrong and being wrong are two very different things my friend.    Lamar wants to run! Roman wants to run! After those things happen the passing game gets the leftovers. Plus ...Lamar sucks at passing outside the numbers down the field. That’s why opponents are giving them 10 inside the hash looks. 
    • I won't lie, the Braves signing Travis Snider the other day stung a little here. Tejada still has him by 2407-2388.   I half feel that if Diaz has to wait 6 weeks - I'd rather it be for Markakis than DJ Stewart. Edwin Encarnacion is the only one ahead of him in Service Time among the unsigned FA in Fangraphs tracker.
    • I don’t see how you can have total trust in a guy, a guy who has barely been here relatively speaking and then question his methods and evaluation of talent.  It doesn’t make much sense. It’s not like Elias has some history as a GM to give him the benefit of the doubt.    His only history that is really positive is working with the Astros, where he was a scout and talent evaluator and worked the draft.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...