Jump to content
Uli2001

MLB looking into starting the season in MAY

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, atomic said:

All this greed for money. You are talking about vey rich owners who can handle a year off. They cancelled a year to lock out players but they have to come up with absurd plans which will endanger many people.

It’s not like the players don’t want to play as well. Takes two to tango and then a portion of the population to watch them dance.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Test players on a daily basis. You only get to play if you test negative or have a positive test for the antibodies. It won't be perfect but should keep it to one or two players at a time. MLB players are not a high risk group anyway.

Test every player, every day. 

Maybe you haven’t been following the news but I don’t think blowing 1500 kits per evening is, like, feasible or smart?

Results aren’t even daily returns yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, survivedc said:

It’s not like the players don’t want to play as well. Takes two to tango and then a portion of the population to watch them dance.

 

Yep, and some want to go to the beach, some to casinos, back to restaurants, some back to work...let's watch them all dance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Test every player, every day. 

Maybe you haven’t been following the news but I don’t think blowing 1500 kits per evening is, like, feasible or smart?

Results aren’t even daily returns yet.

My assumption is that the testing situation is going to be much improved a month from now. I am kind of puzzled as to why we're not already there but that's another story. If not I would agree this would not be a good look.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, UpstateNYfan said:

Yep, and some want to go to the beach, some to casinos, back to restaurants, some back to work...let's watch them all dance.

What? My point is it isn’t like the owners are simply forcing the players to play, this isn’t the sole result of owner greed syndrome. Furthermore a large segment of fans would like there to be baseball on tv for a little diversion. Obviously we shouldn’t be opening beaches and casinos etc right now? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

My assumption is that the testing situation is going to be much improved a month from now. I am kind of puzzled as to why we're not already there but that's another story. If not I would agree this would not be a good look.  

I don't know how anyone could have confidence that, by May or June, MLB could use 1,500 fast-turnaround tests a day, or around 40,000 per month, without affecting the availability of tests to health care workers, persons with symptoms or the general public. I think August is more realistic, and pretty much any month in 2020 that you pick is uncertain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I don't know how anyone could have confidence that, by May or June, MLB could use 1,500 fast-turnaround tests a day, or around 40,000 per month, without affecting the availability of tests to health care workers, persons with symptoms or the general public. I think August is more realistic, and pretty much any month in 2020 that you pick is uncertain.

At this point there are multiple companies ramping up production to make over 50k tests in a day, with a few hoping to make around a million per week. The UK is developing an at home test that is supposed to be ready to go this month. May is certainly optimistic but I don’t think completely out of the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I don't know how anyone could have confidence that, by May or June, MLB could use 1,500 fast-turnaround tests a day, or around 40,000 per month, without affecting the availability of tests to health care workers, persons with symptoms or the general public. I think August is more realistic, and pretty much any month in 2020 that you pick is uncertain.

I'm not confident at all! But I am assuming there are people "in the know" who have more information about what to expect. The pro sports were ahead of everybody in shutting down and they could be ahead of everybody in getting back to business. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I'm not confident at all! But I am assuming there are people "in the know" who have more information about what to expect. The pro sports were ahead of everybody in shutting down and they could be ahead of everybody in getting back to business. 

Dr. Birx said today that the issue they are seeing is the labs not using all of the equipment that they have. That apparently a high output Abbott machine is widespread but not being used for some reason. She said they were meeting with the lab company CEOs tonight or tomorrow to see about increasing throughput. They’ve gotten a lot better in a couple of weeks so hopefully the testing trend continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, survivedc said:

At this point there are multiple companies ramping up production to make over 50k tests in a day, with a few hoping to make around a million per week. The UK is developing an at home test that is supposed to be ready to go this month. May is certainly optimistic but I don’t think completely out of the question.

I don't know what is and isn't out of the question. But based on what I know about testing, which is far from everything, if I were MLB I wouldn't be certain enough that there will be surplus test availability that I would plan a schedule that begins in May, after a short period spring training that would also require testing, probably more than 1,500 tests a day. And while 1,500 tests a day seems like a reasonable number for MLB, if there is going to be MiL play, that number has to be multiplied by at least two or three. 

I forgot to mention in my earlier post that, in my view, tests should go to other countries that need them before they are used to start the MLB season. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, spiritof66 said:

I don't know how anyone could have confidence that, by May or June, MLB could use 1,500 fast-turnaround tests a day, or around 40,000 per month, without affecting the availability of tests to health care workers, persons with symptoms or the general public. I think August is more realistic, and pretty much any month in 2020 that you pick is uncertain.

The market seems to be coming up with a lot of new ways to test.  This for example seems promising:

https://www.billiontoone.com/covid-19

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I'm not confident at all! But I am assuming there are people "in the know" who have more information about what to expect. The pro sports were ahead of everybody in shutting down and they could be ahead of everybody in getting back to business. 

I'm guessing that MLB has lots of information that we don't have. Even if that's true, my problem is with what it will do with that information. With a Commissioner whose principal objective seems to be to please the owners by focusing on the game's short-term revenue prospects and expenses, and a number of owners who have demonstrated a disinterest in MLB's reputation or what used to be called the good of the game, I see no reason to believe that information will be used to reach a decision that is thoughtful and responsible.

And a worst case would be that MLB announces a schedule for a season to begin on Date X, based on projections about test availability and need among other things, and when those projections don't pan out the season needs to be reduced (or run later) again.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, survivedc said:

What? My point is it isn’t like the owners are simply forcing the players to play, this isn’t the sole result of owner greed syndrome. Furthermore a large segment of fans would like there to be baseball on tv for a little diversion. Obviously we shouldn’t be opening beaches and casinos etc right now? 

Psst...if they have a contract, and they all do, they will be "forced" to play. So you decide which diversion is acceptable? If it happens, so be it...I think the quality of games and play will be no better than late ST. Will I watch?? Nope. I won't pay for the MLB package this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, pdiddy said:

Dr. Birx said today that the issue they are seeing is the labs not using all of the equipment that they have. That apparently a high output Abbott machine is widespread but not being used for some reason. She said they were meeting with the lab company CEOs tonight or tomorrow to see about increasing throughput. They’ve gotten a lot better in a couple of weeks so hopefully the testing trend continues.

Sad times that I immediately know who Dr. Birx is. And I barely turn on the TV. Only read the news maybe twice a week. Just sayin'...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I'd say shoe in is a bit strong.  He's only been above average the last couple of seasons. 
    • they need that image to justify in their own minds, why its not a big deal, that a stud HOF shoe in, is no longer a part of this organization.  
    • https://www.espn.com/mlb/insider/story/_/id/29246516/meet-2020-mlb-draft-man-mystery-17-year-old-enormous-upside For anyone who wants more info before drooling over Bitsko ....  Article says Bitsko has elite FB characteristics and is improving secondary stuff.  He could go as high as 8th overall to San Diego.  A Pennsylvania product, Bitsko might not get past the Phillies at 15.   I personally think Jammer's first three picks suggestion with Veen would be outstanding, but it is looking highly unlikely to me.  Dropping from the second rated talent in Martin to Veen around sixth and scooping up Dax Fulton and Bitsko would be a bit risky with the high school lean, but a mouth-watering amount of talent - however unlikely. IMO, the issue with the savings with Veen, or as has been mentioned on-line at multiple sources, Heston Kjerstad, could be $2M+.  With that kind of savings, IMO, the question starts to become whether we can spend that savings.  Our second pick, the first in the first supplemental round and 30th overall carries slot at $2.4M.  IMO, it is difficult to think a pre-draft deal with someone at 30 would be for $ in the top 15 picks  or $3.5M.  We have been rumored to be targeting Dax Fulton - rated in the 40s per some services - with that pick.  Fulton has undergone TJ surgery and might well have been drafted in the middle of the first round without the injury. Our third pick, second in the second round and second on day 2, at 39th overall carries slot at $1.9M.  We could be sitting on Day 2 with over $1M in extra slot $ at our disposal to use on a prospect who simply fell out of the first round, but I expect some bonus requests to come down entering day 2.  It almost becomes a scenario of whether we can spend that $ - perhaps on an overslot signing with our third or fourth round picks, but IMO it is very difficult to game that far ahead and assume a certain prospect or pool of prospects will be there - especially since we don't know if other teams are going to use senior signings in rounds 3, 4 and/or 5 in order to go overslot on one other player after the first round.  The entire scenario could also blow up if Dax is popped in the first round.  I am sure we would have a back-up plan at 30 and would have an entire night to plan how to spend remaining slot savings, but IMO there is plenty of risk - who knows, perhaps Elias would laugh and say he has little doubt he could spend extra slot $ - and Elias could walk away from this draft with four prospects signed at over $2M each. I would think it is much safer to just draft Martin, Fulton and the prospect we like best at 39 even if we need a senior sign in the third or fourth round to find more slot $.  Then grab two more prospects at slot in our top 150.    
    • Couple of things. I don’t recall 100% now from where- I think it was a local radio interview- but Callis poured some cold water on the whole Correa $ underslot  comparison. He basically said many teams had him at the top and his agent really screwed up.   I really hope we take Martin. Callis thinks he is a .300, 20 HR type. We know he can get on base. Try him in CF and then move him to 2nd base if that doesn’t work out. You are a perennial All Star at those spots if you put up those kind of numbers. I can’t stand the guy but Pedroia was a big part of some good Red Sox teams. Martin’s bat has some comparisons.  The Brewers have been able to mix and match their way to some success but in general you better build your position player core from within. We see how much players age now so quickly.  Most contending teams in recent years have a strong position player  core from within. Look at Cubs- Bryant, Baez, Contreras, Rizzo. I know Rizzo was a trade and the White Sox traded for Moncada and Jimenez but we really don’t have assets to deal right now to get back top prospects. We need to hit on these picks and hopefully hit on some International players. I have some faith that are new staff can get more out of the pitching we have than previous regimes. I would not be angry about Lacy but I would take my chances on some arms at picks 30 and/or 39.
    • Agreed.  Many like to only remember the handful of times he lackadaisically jogged down first base. 
    • https://www.prospectslive.com/mlb-draft/2020/6/1/mlb-mock-draft-30  
    • not sure how agreeable the owners would be to that. You still run smack dab into football conflicts
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...