Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Moose Milligan

The Most Hyped Orioles Prospect...

Recommended Posts

One thing I remember vividly about McDonald is that the Orioles took away his out pitch(forkball) straight out of the gate. They thought he could prolong his career by not throwing it. Which always brings me to the question. Is it better to burn out or fade away?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, OsEatAlEast said:

One thing I remember vividly about McDonald is that the Orioles took away his out pitch(forkball) straight out of the gate. They thought he could prolong his career by not throwing it. Which always brings me to the question. Is it better to burn out or fade away?

In 1910 it was "only a fool uses his best stuff except when he really needs it, because you have to go nine every 3-4 days. Or more."

Today it's "use your best stuff all the time, or you're going to get the crap knocked out of you.  But we'll yank you after five innings, and you only pitch once every five or six days."

Overall I'm not sure there's a lot of difference in how long a pitcher lasts.

Or... on smaller time scales Palmer vs Mussina.  Four-man rotation and some high-pitch games and high-inning seasons, vs. never topping 250 innings in a five-man and more pitch counts.  Palmer threw a few more career innings, but Mussina had three more seasons of 150+ innings.  Mussina was never really injured, Palmer missed part or all of four years.  And they had almost identical career W/L records.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

In 1910 it was "only a fool uses his best stuff except when he really needs it, because you have to go nine every 3-4 days. Or more."

Today it's "use your best stuff all the time, or you're going to get the crap knocked out of you.  But we'll yank you after five innings, and you only pitch once every five or six days."

Overall I'm not sure there's a lot of difference in how long a pitcher lasts.

Or... on smaller time scales Palmer vs Mussina.  Four-man rotation and some high-pitch games and high-inning seasons, vs. never topping 250 innings in a five-man and more pitch counts.  Palmer threw a few more career innings, but Mussina had three more seasons of 150+ innings.  Mussina was never really injured, Palmer missed part or all of four years.  And they had almost identical career W/L records.

We've had this talk before.  Wins and losses aren't the best criteria to use when evaluating pitchers.  😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

Look at those complete games! 17 combined.  Only two AL guys had as many as three in 2019.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, scOtt said:

I was going to mention Hammond too. I mean, he had a fine ML career, for us and others too. But never reached the hype he was supposed to be.

Hammonds was supposed to hit .300 with 20+ home run power and steal some bases. Never got to that level, but he was decent when healthy and that was the major issue for his entire career.

Hammonds only played more than 120 games in a season three times with a high of 128 games played in 2002.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

Man, McDonald's 1993 season looks like a Cy Young Award type year! He didn't even get any votes...

220.1 IP, 3.39 ERA, 171 Ks, 7 CG, 0.7 HR/9

Look at those same stats from the guy who won it that year, Jack McDowell.  Not that different.  Guess they really valued wins.

256.2 IP, 3.37 ERA, 158 Ks, 10 CG, 0.7 HR/9

 

McDonalds's ERA going into the last game of the season was 3.09. That would have been good enough to finish 4th in the AL in 1993. Johnny Oates gave Ben a chance to rest, but he wanted to start and move his ERA ranking up to 2nd or 3rd. Instead he finished out of the top 10 in ERA leaders after giving up 8 earned runs in 1 & 2/3 innings pitched. 

Kevin Appier who led the AL with an 2.56 ERA and in pitching WAR with 9.3, would have easily won the Cy Young in today's world of advanced analytics. McDowell only put up a 4.4 WAR in comparison. Appier got penalized for only winning 18 games in 1993.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, orpheus100 said:

Ben McDonald was still good

Wieters was a tragedy

Tragedy is way too strong. I mean, he was hyped on the cover of SI as the Swith-Hitting Jesus. Before he even played an inning of pro ball. He had/has another fine career. And when it was close and late, and Matt was coming to bat, you felt good! ROCKET arm and the fastest footwork I've ever seen.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, scOtt said:

Tragedy is way too strong. I mean, he was hyped on the cover of SI as the Swith-Hitting Jesus. Before he even played an inning of pro ball. He had/has another fine career. And when it was close and late, and Matt was coming to bat, you felt good! ROCKET arm and the fastest footwork I've ever seen.

The hype for Matt didn't kick into high gear until he was playing in the minors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The hype for Matt didn't kick into high gear until he was playing in the minors.

True, and it’s not like he wasn’t a good player.   Just not a great one.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

McDonalds's ERA going into the last game of the season was 3.09. That would have been good enough to finish 4th in the AL in 1993. Johnny Oates gave Ben a chance to rest, but he wanted to start and move his ERA ranking up to 2nd or 3rd. Instead he finished out of the top 10 in ERA leaders after giving up 8 earned runs in 1 & 2/3 innings pitched. 

Kevin Appier who led the AL with an 2.56 ERA and in pitching WAR with 9.3, would have easily won the Cy Young in today's world of advanced analytics. McDowell only put up a 4.4 WAR in comparison. Appier got penalized for only winning 18 games in 1993.

Lol imagine putting up a 9.3 WAR as a starting pitcher and leading the AL with a 2.53 ERA and not winning the Cy Young...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like Matt Weiters' final few (pricey and injury-riddled) years in Baltimore hurt his legacy here.  It definitely distracts from how well he did in his first few years:

2009-2012=

  • 13.3 WAR
  • 2,031 PA  
  • 2 Gold Gloves, 2 All Star Selections
  • Made about $1.7 Million over those 4 years

2013-2016=

  • 4.9 WAR
  • 1,437 PA
  • 0 Gold Gloves, 2 All Star Selections (one in a season which he played only 26 games)
  • Made about $37.3 Million over those 4 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • No.  He should be.  If you're going to put in a guy like Kirby Puckett who's career was cut short then you have to look at Belle. The differences here are that everyone loved Puckett and he had glaucoma.  Everyone hated Belle and he had a bad hip.  Glaucoma and loss of eyesight in a guy that everyone loves gets sympathy.  A bad hip on a guy that everyone hates gets ignored. Puckett:  .318/.360/.477 for an .837 OPS, 124 OPS+  51.1 WAR.  2,304 hits, 207 homers, 1085 RBI in 7,244 at bats.  Pretty confident that if he played out his career he'd have gotten 3,000 hits.  Also worth mentioning his 6 Gold Gloves.   Belle:  .295/.369/.564 for a .933 OPS, 144 OPS+ 40.1 WAR.  1,726 hits, 381 homers, 1,239 RBI in 5,853 at bats.  Pretty confident that if he played out his career he would have passed 500 homers, maybe approached 600. Belle had 1,391 less at bats and trailed only by 11 WAR.  If I'm doing my math correctly, had Belle been able to have an equal number of at bats, he would have slightly exceeded Puckett's value.   But Belle was a bad guy, threw baseballs at people, terrorized trick or treaters, was surly and didn't like the press.  So the press took joy in letting him drop off the ballot.  Don't get me wrong, I understand it and I'm not saying Belle is a shoe-in by any stretch.  But I feel like there have been less deserving players who have stayed on the ballot longer.  If Belle was an angel, he'd have a different legacy, IMO.
    • The two options are to (1) pay the players to play what you have agreed to pay them in front of no fans or (2) cancel the season. Logically, the only way that paying the players becomes economically infeasible is if it is cheaper to cancel the season completely. Economic feasibility isn't based on maximizing profitability or minimizing losses to the owners by modifying the other portions of the agreement. It is based on the difference between those two binary choices.
    • If this is really what that provision says, I don't see how "economic feasibility" does not include the costs of paying the players.  
    • I don't like the idea of just deciding not to take a pitcher.  Maybe it is because they rank some of the underslot guys higher, but if the strategy is just not take a pitcher generally I think it's unwise. 
    • I can't believe you didn't simulate sitting Means in the simulated spring training when he complained of simulated tightness in his forearm.  Plus, the simulated pitching overall has been abysmal.  
    • You are oversimplifying and you are under the false assumption that owners can unilaterally shorten the season. The owners don't get to decide whether it is cheaper to not play than to play. They have to open the books and prove to the players that they would lose more money not playing than by playing without fans. Only then can the owners cancel the season. Presumably, if the owners were to open the books and convince the players that they would lose more money playing without fans than they would in canceling the season, thereby permitting them the option of canceling the season, players might be interested in sacrificing additional money to have a season, but the owners have not yet done that. The players and owners have a mutual obligation to start the season as soon as possible and to play as many games as possible. That obligation is not discharged by the owners losing money for the season, it is only discharged by the owners proving they would lose more money playing without fans than they would lose if they didn't play at all. The owners almost certain WOULD lose less money with a shorter season (say 40 games vs. 82) and an expanded playoffs, but that would also violate the March agreement, just as trying to renegotiate salary without proving playing without fans is more fiscally damaging than not playing violates the March agreement.
    • Kjerstad at 2 would be a big disappointment to me, under-slot strategy or not. If not Tork, Martin or even Lacy, I'll just shake my head and wait to see who else we get.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...