Jump to content
weams

MLB Pipeline: Austin Martin

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

What I find interesting is the deadline isn't until Aug first.  So negotiations couldn't have been that difficult given Boras' penchant for waiting to sign.

I wonder if he’s in the running for a roster spot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So he signed for over 700K less than the Orioles' slot allotment for the number two pick.

So they couldn't have gotten Blitsko or both of the two HS'ers then right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bobmc said:

So they couldn't have gotten Blitsko or both of the two HS'ers then right?

They didn't get Bitsko anyway. 

If they had convinced him to sign for the 700K saving and went over the allotment they might have snagged one of them.

It certainly doesn't look like he would have refused to sign for slot.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, for the umteenth time, either Elias isn't so smart or maybe the Orioles actually like Kjerstad as much or more.  If Martin was higher on their board than Kjerstad and they clearly felt he was the better prospect then I disagree with what they did which leads me to the belief that the Orioles simply didn't evaluate Martin as highly as others have.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

28 of 29 first round picks have now been signed. Garrett Mitchell (20th overall to the Brewers) is the lone unsigned first-rounder. Of the 28 signed first-rounders, the largest underslot in terms of dollar amount are:

2. Heston Kjerstad: $2.59 million

23. Carson Tucker: $930,000

17. Nick Yorke: $910,000

8. Robert Hassell: $880,000

18. Bryce Jarvis: $830,000

25. Jared Shuster: $540,000

3. Max Meyer: $520,000

The largest underslot by percentage:

2. Heston Kjerstad: 33.25%

23. Carson Tucker: 31.74%

17. Nick Yorke: 25.20%

18. Bryce Jarvis: 23.85%

25. Jared Shuster: 19.71%

14. Justin Foscue: 19.55%

8. Robert Hassell: 16.99%

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So he signed for over 700K less than the Orioles' slot allotment for the number two pick.

 

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

They didn't get Bitsko anyway. 

If they had convinced him to sign for the 700K saving and went over the allotment they might have snagged one of them.

It certainly doesn't look like he would have refused to sign for slot.

It's also possible he lost some leverage on his demands when teams let him go to number 5. Still got the 2nd highest SB of the draft. I don't know if it's logical to suggest he would have settled at the same place for the Orioles. And how do you arrive at the bolded when he just signed for well above the slot at which he was selected?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

 

It's also possible he lost some leverage on his demands when teams let him go to number 5. Still got the 2nd highest SB of the draft. I don't know if it's logical to suggest he would have settled at the same place for the Orioles. And how do you arrive at the bolded when he just signed for well above the slot at which he was selected?

He signed quickly (for a Boras client)and less than what the Jays could have paid.  You think it is reasonable to think he would have sat out with 700K more on the table?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

He signed quickly (for a Boras client)and less than what the Jays could have paid.  You think it is reasonable to think he would have sat out with 700K more on the table?

How much more could the Jays have paid without incurring burdensome penalties?

Their bonus total is $10.2M and their allotment is/was $9.7M

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/draft/2020/toronto-blue-jays/

I just don't see how you're using him signing over the slot at which he was selected, taking the team to it's 105% number in the process, as evidence that he would have signed for slot in Baltimore. If anything it rules out that he would have been an underslot candidate and/or is inconclusive evidence.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

How much more could the Jays have paid without incurring burdensome penalties?

Their bonus total is $10.2M and their allotment is/was $9.7M

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/draft/2020/toronto-blue-jays/

I just don't see how you're using him signing over the slot at which he was selected, taking the team to it's 105% number in the process, as evidence that he would have signed for slot in Baltimore. If anything it rules out that he would have been an underslot candidate and/or is inconclusive evidence.

Because he agreed to a lesser amount of money instead of going back to school.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

So he signed for over 700K less than the Orioles' slot allotment for the number two pick.

After he fell to the fifth pick and had to wait weeks. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2020 at 5:39 PM, RZNJ said:

So, for the umteenth time, either Elias isn't so smart or maybe the Orioles actually like Kjerstad as much or more.  If Martin was higher on their board than Kjerstad and they clearly felt he was the better prospect then I disagree with what they did which leads me to the belief that the Orioles simply didn't evaluate Martin as highly as others have.

Isn't there a third possibility?

Maybe they felt Martin was a little better than Kjerstad but that bei g able to get the overslot guys they got in the 4th and 5th more than compensated for that difference.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Isn't there a third possibility?

Maybe they felt Martin was a little better than Kjerstad but that bei g able to get the overslot guys they got in the 4th and 5th more than compensated for that difference.

This is the most likely thing.    Though it’s also possible Elias thought there would be a good overslot candidate available at 30, and it didn’t play out that way.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I was at that game in 1993. I was seated in the lower deck of Yankee Stadium on the third-base side, looking out toward right field.  I saw the play from pretty much the same angle that the umpire would have seen it. And I didn't know, until I read about it in the paper the next day, what had happened, because I completely lost track of the ball as it descended against the backdrop of three decks of seats filled with fans.  I assumed, since Mattingly jogged around the bases, that it had landed in the seats beyond the wall. Perhaps the umpire, from his vantage point on the field, should have been close enough to see the play better than I could.  But I could understand why it could have been tough for him.
    • Zimmermann had a bad debut (3 IP 5 ER) but a good second outing (4 IP 1 ER).   So, I certainly didn’t get a negative impression of him.   I look forward to seeing what he can contribute next year.   
    • For 2B how about bringing back Jonathan Schoop or Jurickson Profar. Todd Feazier one year  deal for3B. 
    • I agree with RZ about sticking with Ruiz.  We don't have anyone better internally unless someone switches positions.   If there is a clear upgrade available at 3B for the major league roster, I think we could pursue anyone that is cheap - cheap to acquire and cheap to pay.  Ruiz was available as a cheap, failed prospect and if we could acquire another one and try it again, I would be fine with that.
    • I think I tend to be not as high on overslots as most people. Let's take Hokum Sven Kim as a hypothetical.  Hokum's number is $1.5 million.  He's still there in the eleventh round and the O's pick him up and with the savings from going underslot in the first round given Hokum his 1.5M. Now some folks will say the O's picked up a mid second round talent in the eleventh round, since 1.5M is slot for the 49.5 pick in the draft. The way I look at it, if other teams though Hokum was a mid second round talent they would have just picked him and coughed up the 1.5M. Either Hokum's number would have been even higher if he had gone earlier, which is possible, or teams didn't think his price matched his talent and he's probably closer to say a third round talent.
    • Maybe not even better than what we have now, but cheaper (i.e. not arbitration eligible). When you are in such a cost cutting move that you are getting rid of coaches, I think they will look long and hard at going to arbitration with anyone who is unlikely to be a prime MLB performer for the next several years. At least they won't get any flak for cancelling Fanfest to save a few pennies this offseason.
    • Probably true. In fairness, Tony said 17-25 could be placed many ways. Small preferences could move a guy several spots. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...