Jump to content
weams

MLB makes new proposal- Union demands start date and terms by Monday

Recommended Posts

My guess is they’ll work something out, but I’m not going to hold my breath about it.    Wake me up when they’ve reached agreement.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My guess is they’ll work something out, but I’m not going to hold my breath about it.    Wake me up when they’ve reached agreement.   

I have to admit, I was completely hopeless before. Up thru very recently. Both sides seemed to be setting their position in stone for a true work stoppage, whether strike or lockout, or just never getting around to an agreement this year. Loggerheads.

I have some hope again today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Here's hoping it happens.  But the players are a bunch of whiny self entitled bitches.  We'll see.  

If the players don't play they are going to look at a fall of no major free agent signings.  Then in 2022  there might be a work stoppage.   

At this point I don't care.  Let them cancel their season.  I have Hockey playoffs to look forward to. And I can stream those without a cable package.   Watching a never ending carousel of random waiver claims starting for the Orioles doesn't sound very appealing anyway. 

Can anyone name the Orioles starting five?  Can Hyde?  Can he name even 3 of them? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Frobby said:

My guess is they’ll work something out, but I’m not going to hold my breath about it.    Wake me up when they’ve reached agreement.   

If they really wanted to settle this they would just meet  somewhere and stay together to they hash this out.  They could have a zoom session if they are scared of getting covid or meet outside in one of the empty stadiums.  Whatever this silly back and forth every 4 days or so where they announce their reactions to the press instead of the other side is not making progress.  I do hope the season is cancelled because it is our best chance of ending up with a salary cap if the players start hurting they might be more likely to agree to one in the next agreeement.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, atomic said:

Can anyone name the Orioles starting five?  Can Hyde?  Can he name even 3 of them? 

No love for Wojo haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One interesting thing about the proposal is that if less than 81 games are played that MLB can use something other than this years standings to determine next year's draft order.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

No love for Wojo haha

Citadel. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now the latest players counterproposal is in:  89 games, full pro rated salary.

Does not seem to be progress to me.

(Source:  Nightengale)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, SteveA said:

And now the latest players counterproposal is in:  89 games, full pro rated salary.

Does not seem to be progress to me.

(Source:  Nightengale)

Ya I don’t think it is. No one is willing to make a concession. MLB will not concede full prorated pay and mlbpa will not accept anything less it seems. AND they just proposed a longer season than the proposal before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SteveA said:

And now the latest players counterproposal is in:  89 games, full pro rated salary.

Does not seem to be progress to me.

(Source:  Nightengale)

And Jon Heyman reports that his "ownership source" (didn't know he had one?) says:   "We're nowhere".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteveA said:

And Jon Heyman reports that his "ownership source" (didn't know he had one?) says:   "We're nowhere".

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen a decent economic analysis of the expected revenue and non-player costs in MLB this year, assuming games in smaller stadiums with no fans present?     It seems logical to me, at first blush, that revenues will be down by more than the proportionate number of games played.    In other words, half a season results in less than half the total revenue.   But I really don’t know, because a lot depends on how the TV revenues are affected.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Has anyone seen a decent economic analysis of the expected revenue and non-player costs in MLB this year, assuming games in smaller stadiums with no fans present?     It seems logical to me, at first blush, that revenues will be down by more than the proportionate number of games played.    In other words, half a season results in less than half the total revenue.   But I really don’t know, because a lot depends on how the TV revenues are affected.    

I think that’s a good hypothesis. I’d say the owners may have to think of this as a multi round game, though. Let’s hypothetically  say the owners are better off in 2020 not playing games than the prorated option. They would still need to consider the impact of not playing 2020 on 2021 and beyond. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Very good game tonight. Both pens were real good. 
    • That fact that he pointed out Anthony Sanders and his race as being the one screwed also made me question it.
    • I'm surprised by this comment, Tony.  I'm not sure how you can blame Elias for Yaz coming out of nowhere to perform as he has for the Giants.  You really think there was reason to expect that Elias should have seen that coming?  Wow.
    • I’m guessing that a claim was probably filed against Elias and the Orioles for pension fraud (possibly by the agent of a coach on the staff that didn’t get the pension benefits), but since MLB approved Holt before the season as one of the 4 coaches designated to receive pension benefits, that’s why this is a non-story.  The quote from the MLB spokesperson said Holt received prior approval from the league and shared it with the MLBPA, so the only possible explanation is that the MLBPA is challenging Holt’s approval since he wasn’t a full-time uniformed coach this year, and that is likely what this botched article by Bill Madden is attempting to convey.  Even if a charge of pension fraud was filed by the MLBPA, or the agent of a coach separate from the MLBPA, it sounds like it’s dead in the water because MLB released a statement saying Holt was approved and there is no ongoing investigation that could result in discipline for Elias/Orioles.     Simply put, Bill Madden did a piss poor job of reporting this accurately, and tried to connect it with the Astros, which is why the article lead with “Ex-Astros” and “fraud” to get readers to click on it.  In reality, all Madden had to do is verify the story with MLB, like our local beat writers did, and he would have been told that this is a non-issue because Holt received prior authorization from the league to receive pension benefits, meaning this was not some covert, fraudulent attempt by Elias to get Holt on the pension plan without going through the proper approval process.  That’s why most of us thought from the very start that this story didn’t pass the smell test, and now we know we were proven correct in that assessment.
    • Journalism is a lost art nowadays in this day and age of blogging and tweeting.
    • I prefer Valaika as well. I don't think Wilkerson is a a good major league player, but as I said, he's a decent guy to have in the system. I think Urena will get first shot to stick as the everyday 2B, but Valaika could be in the running for sure. 
    • Elias has brought in different technologies that are supposedly used to help evaluate players as well as help them improve. They used those vests, those devices on the knobs of the bats and Statcast. What I'm saying is that Elias may want to take a look at what they missed with Yaz. Clearly his development or lack thereof was not on Elias' watch, but he brought in these technologies and they apparently did not indicate that Yaz had the potential to do what he's done. I also clearly stated that I never had Yaz on any of my lists so you can take the smart ass "What did you miss?" comment and keep it to yourself because that's disrespectful. I don't have nearly the access that the Orioles have on all of his data (Data was collected on AAA players in 2019 and available to the teams) so the question becomes, why did Yaz show nothing and then with some quick changes with SF coaches he becomes an impact player? If I'm Elias, I want to know the answer to that.  I also clearly showed that Elias's record of bringing in similar players to a Yaz has been pretty dismal.  When you take the two together, I think it's fair to ask the question what did they miss? If you don't fine, but at the end of the day, Elias gave away an impact player for nothing and has acquired none in two years. those are facts that can't be denied no matter how much you wanna wear orange colored glasses.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...