Jump to content
Can_of_corn

Y'all Seen the New Stadium in Texas?

Recommended Posts

I still don't buy the argument that the Rangers needed a new ballpark when the The Ballpark in Arlington was 25 years old.  If you're going to make the lack of a retractable roof argument then spare me because the Rangers played over twenty years in a metal scrapheap that was a glorified minor league park.  

As for the stadium, by the looks of it the Rangers better hope the baseball is finger licking, lip smacking good.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ShaneDawg85 said:

I still don't buy the argument that the Rangers needed a new ballpark when the The Ballpark in Arlington was 25 years old.  If you're going to make the lack of a retractable roof argument then spare me because the Rangers played over twenty years in a metal scrapheap that was a glorified minor league park.  

As for the stadium, by the looks of it the Rangers better hope the baseball is finger licking, lip smacking good.

I had some darned good food across the street before the new park was revealed as a smoker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Ohh boy.

Its a giant smoker.

vkrn1y8n6w651.jpg

 

Nah, this is a giant smoker.

World%E2%80%99s-Largest-Touring-Grill.jp

I know it's only a grill, not a smoker...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like those OF dimensions.   Should make for some very wacky bounces and maybe a few gruesome injuries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine having AC and a closed roof during day games will make things a lot more comfortable for the players and the fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dc2aa6be3c7fd31272650be00e611104--kingsf

I don't know who the marketing firm for the Kingsford Charcoal company is but they should be on the phone with Rangers management immediately!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/3/2020 at 11:10 AM, Frobby said:

I like those OF dimensions.   Should make for some very wacky bounces and maybe a few gruesome injuries.

I prefer interesting outfield dimensions based on constraints imposed on the architecture like the shape of the lot.  It's pretty artificial when you have 11 weird angles in the outfield fence in a park that looks like a Zeppelin hangar stuck in the middle of 11,000 acres of parking.

Oh, and so much for my idea of bigger parks to encourage contact.  This one looks like another bandbox with short alleys.  Every new park should be at least 350-390-430-390-350.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I prefer interesting outfield dimensions based on constraints imposed on the architecture like the shape of the lot.  It's pretty artificial when you have 11 weird angles in the outfield fence in a park that looks like a Zeppelin hangar stuck in the middle of 11,000 acres of parking.

Oh, and so much for my idea of bigger parks to encourage contact.  This one looks like another bandbox with short alleys.  Every new park should be at least 350-390-430-390-350.

The angles may be artificial, but they’re still fun.    I agree with you that overall I’d like it better if the fences were deeper.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently if you give the same architecture firm more than 5 billion to play with instead of a chincy 1 billion you get SoFi stadium. I’m not sure it looks 4 billion dollars different. Plus you don’t even get natural grass.

hqc8otqpfcj90sle_1589959892.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/24/2020 at 10:36 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Ohh boy.

Its a giant smoker.

vkrn1y8n6w651.jpg

The on-field dimensions

800px-GlobeLifeField.svg.png

 

When it's raining out the clatter on that tin roof will be terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, SteveA said:

When it's raining out the clatter on that tin roof will be terrible.

I went to a Texans game when there was a big storm.  They have these huge windows.  It was a little wild sitting in the upper deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I just saw this article and was about to post it myself but you beat me to it.  Some pretty cool statistical comparisons with stadiums built after Camden Yards.  I'm still not sure how I feel about this "modern" stadium.  I like the idea of being closer to the field, but it's hard to beat a game at Oriole Park at Camden Yards.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

I just saw this article and was about to post it myself but you beat me to it.  Some pretty cool statistical comparisons with stadiums built after Camden Yards.  I'm still not sure how I feel about this "modern" stadium.  I like the idea of being closer to the field, but it's hard to beat a game at Oriole Park at Camden Yards.  

I think someone could design a nice ballpark that doesn't look like a warehouse, that fits into a city grid, and has a cantilevered design that puts fans closer without obstructing beams.  I'm not at all a fan of parks way out the suburbs surrounded by huge parking lots and entertainment complexes designed to maximize revenues.

I'm guessing we won't see all that many new parks in the near future with almost everyone in a nice place that's been built in the last 30 years, or Fenway/Wrigley which aren't going anywhere.  Although I guess the Rangers/Braves model is to tear down parks built for $750M in taxpayer money 20 years ago and replace with $1B+ parks paid for by taxpayers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • In a regular 162-game season, I often observe that our posters who tend to rely heavily on the metrics (for their determination on whether to be optimistic about the team) will wait til at least half the season is gone before they start to draw any conclusions about how the team is doing. Sometimes they'll make an earlier call if the team starts out extremely bad or good out of the gate, but usually they reserve judgment for as long as possible. To these folks, the entire season will be a "SSS". On top of that, we're making history here -- there has never been a 60 game season in the modern era. There have been a large number of rule changes in recent years, starting with challenges and video review, and culminating in the leadoff guy on 2nd in extras. We can only guess how all these factors will come together to change the dynamics of the game, and even after the season's over, the conclusions we draw will not be well-substantiated due to the relative lack of data that a mere 60 games can provide. For the folks who refuse to get excited until there's a statistically significant track record to suggest that we have something special, they may spend this entire season just shrugging their shoulders, then blink and notice that it's over (or that the O's are in the expanded postseason). To them I say: that's their right. I don't care. But I'm excited, and hopeful that this ragtag crew will be something special in 2020. I don't care if Sulser or Severino isn't part of the solution in 2022 or 2025. I'm fine with Elias continuing to make moves with the assumption that we are in rebuild mode. I'm fine with folks not even caring about this season because it's weird, and because the confluence of factors that made this season what it is probably won't happen again.  I'm just living in the moment, taking it day by day, and enjoying our baseball team's success right now. Someone's gotta root for these guys!
    • They’re winning games that bad teams usually don’t. 
    • It's fun to watch when they play good, fundamental baseball.  Of course I want them to make the playoffs, but I'm just happy to have an enjoyable baseball game to watch every night.
    • 6 INN.  9K's.  0 Runs tonight.  At 92 pitches, I'm guessing he doesn't come out for the 7th.  I've watched his last two starts and there doesn't seem to be any trace of the power pitcher he was once destined to be.  None.  Sure is getting good results with his breaking stuff though.
    • o   Tonight's game ........tonight's game would have been the quintessential example of that scenario coming to fruition. Could you imagine if the Orioles are 11-9 after 20 games, and then they had a game play out PRECISELY like tonight's game did ??? Elias would have been continually picking the telephone up and hanging back up again every few minutes over the final 4 innings of the game.   o
    • Girardi looks like he has the Phillies playing some fundamentally sound baseball.
    • 8-1 in scheduled games.  Damn Marlins screwed it up and made us 0-6 in make ups.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...