Jump to content
Sir_Loin

Kjerstad comes in at #99 on BA Top 100

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You are the one who went there. 

If you want to claim he plays the game the right away defend that hit on the first baseman.  Stuck me as a Chad move. 

Really? You took offense to that? The defender was clearly in his path back to the bag. I have watched the replay a few times. Kjerstad's job was to get back to the bag, the defender was a step or two in front of the bag, and Kjerstad had to go through him. Give me a break

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you think pointlessly knocking down a defending player is playing the right way.  Got it.

And I don't know why you bother to respond if you refuse to address the point I am making and are instead just going to complain.

Mountains out of mole hills

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Es4M11 said:

Really? You took offense to that? The defender was clearly in his path back to the bag. I have watched the replay a few times. Kjerstad's job was to get back to the bag, the defender was a step or two in front of the bag, and Kjerstad had to go through him. Give me a break

I'm not offended by it but I certainly wouldn't call it playing the game the right way.  It was excessive.

I stand by calling it a Chad move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not offended by it but I certainly wouldn't call it playing the game the right way.  It was excessive.

I stand by calling it a Chad move.

I'll second the other poster. You're wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

Mountains out of mole hills

Not really.  I don't think it's a big deal.  But I do think if someone is going to proclaim a player they have probably barely seen "plays the game the right way" that it should be addressed.

I for one don't feel qualified to say how Kjerstad "plays the game", if we even know what "playing the game the right way" even means. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, weams said:

Best available batter. I think they ruled out pitching. 

Kjerstad had better power than Martin. I don’t think he’s the better for average/OBP hitter. Only time will tell. I believe he was the best LH power bat in this draft.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

if we even know what "playing the game the right way" even means. 

This should be interesting.  I'm sure that means "hustle everywhere, say "yes sir, no sir" and show up early for practice, stay late, run out ground balls as hard as you can, always be paying attention" and whatever other cliche's we can come up with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you think pointlessly knocking down a defending player is playing the right way.  Got it.

And I don't know why you bother to respond if you refuse to address the point I am making and are instead just going to complain.

Cheap shots aren’t right and neither is spiking a runner. If he was just playing hard that’s a different story. I don’t recall the play so I don’t have an opinion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Not really.  I don't think it's a big deal.  But I do think if someone is going to proclaim a player they have probably barely seen "plays the game the right way" that it should be addressed.

I for one don't feel qualified to say how Kjerstad "plays the game", if we even know what "playing the game the right way" even means. 

No, but you do feel qualified to slander him for a fair play -- umpire agreed -- in the field of competition. Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Es4M11 said:

No, but you do feel qualified to slander him for a fair play -- umpire agreed -- in the field of competition. Got it.

Something can be within the rules and still be a chad move.  That's kinda the definition in my mind.  A jerk of a move but not illegal.

If you think that qualifies as slander, well good on you.  I've been called a lot worse here on OH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

This should be interesting.  I'm sure that means "hustle everywhere, say "yes sir, no sir" and show up early for practice, stay late, run out ground balls as hard as you can, always be paying attention" and whatever other cliche's we can come up with.

There was a term I believe that was used “gritty player”

Thay described a guy that was usually not as talented but got the most out of his skills. Running hard, taking the extra base, getting his uniform dirty, sacrificing his body to make a play , etc

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Cheap shots aren’t right and neither is spiking a runner. If he was just playing hard that’s a different story. I don’t recall the play so I don’t have an opinion. 

It's the first play on the highlight video.

And it isn't the worst thing in the world.  But in my eyes it was a Chad move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Roll Tide said:

There was a term I believe that was used “gritty player”

Thay described a guy that was usually not as talented but got the most out of his skills. Running hard, taking the extra base, getting his uniform dirty, sacrificing his body to make a play , etc

And didn't do things like bat flip.

For the record I love bat flips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Not really.  I don't think it's a big deal.  But I do think if someone is going to proclaim a player they have probably barely seen "plays the game the right way" that it should be addressed.

Hey CoC!  I was born and raised in Arkansas.  As a lifelong Razorback fan, I have watched many Razorback games in person and via SEC Network.  I think I've seen Kjerstad play ball probably a few more times than you have. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rudyrooster said:

Hey CoC!  I was born and raised in Arkansas.  As a lifelong Razorback fan, I have watched many Razorback games in person and via SEC Network.  I think I've seen Kjerstad play ball probably a few more times than you have. 

Great.  That would be why I said probably.  To make allowances for that exact scenario.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Would that just be due to attrition from players that have graduated? 
    • I'm also blaming @LookinUp as I read his interpretation, too, before looking at the cover.  
    • I do not read this headline as saying Rutschman is the no. 1 prospect in MLB.   It’s saying he’s no. 1 on the Orioles.    As to our system being “pitching rich,” of the Orioles’ top 10, 5 are pitchers; of our top 20, 10 are pitchers.   So it’s a 50/50 system and if you look around baseball, that’s the norm.   I’d say our system has slightly above average hitting and pitching right now, and it’s a slightly above average system.   I’d say we might have a little more depth once you get beyond the top 10 pitchers in the system than most teams, but we’re not overflowing with top-end pitching talent.     
    • Remember when major league baseball assumed that putting games on TV meant that nobody would come to the games and they'd go bankrupt?  Well, no, you and I don't, but in the 50s that was a common theme.  Of course now they make more money from TV and streaming than gate revenues.  Or close. As much as the Orioles have progressed the last few years an attitude like that on some things may still prevail. Or more likely they have contracts with the cable companies and DirecTV that they won't put it on streaming in exchange for more money from people who don't watch sports.
    • Am I wrong in thinking MASN could make more money making it available on streaming devices? I look at this way..the average age of the baseball fan is far older than most sports.  Most older people are not going to give up cable.  It’s “easier” than the steaming services in many ways.  It’s the younger generation that is going away from cable.  Wouldn’t it make sense to also allow those generations to see your product in different ways?
    • Yeah, I think your interpretation is most likely correct.  I didn't read it that way initially.  
    • Thanks.  Too bad.  To add to my list, I just realized last night that I don't have a good solution for BBC America without Directv or a streaming service other than Hulu.  Can't go without Dr. Who and Top Gear.  Will continue to research options...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...