Jump to content
Sir_Loin

Kjerstad comes in at #99 on BA Top 100

Recommended Posts

 

O's fans are gonna grow to love Kjerstad.  He's a high character kid with a high ceiling as a baseball player.  As an Arkansan and of course a big Razorback fan, I have watched him play many times in college.  He has that "it" factor that is so rare. BTW, he is much more solid defensively than some are giving him credit for.  Give this kid a chance please before passing judgement.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, if BA’s assessment is right that Martin is the no. 16 prospect in the minors,  I don’t think passing him over to save money for later rounds was a good move.   

Fangraphs has Martin at no. 52.    The move becomes much more defensible if that’s your assessment.    
 

His 99 ranking and Martin's 16 rankings are completely based on their draft ratings. There is no way BA admits to any suggestion that they were wrong. They will continue to rank Martin higher unless he (Martin) is a bust. That's always been their standard operating procedure.

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

His 99 ranking and Martin's 16 rankings are completely based on their draft ratings. There is no way BA admits to any suggestion that they were wrong. They will continue to rank Martin higher unless he (Martin) is a bust. That's always been their standard operating procedure.

What else would you use to rank them?  Draft order?

Are you suggesting they bump up Kjerstad simply because of where the O's picked him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What else would you use to rank them?  Draft order?

Are you suggesting they bump up Kjerstad simply because of where the O's picked him?

Why not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, rudyrooster said:

Why not?

For starters because they are probably going to pay him like he was picked 6th.

Also why should they have such little faith in their own work that they make changes based solely over what one team thought?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, rudyrooster said:

Why not?

I guess we want to be like the college football rating systems, where a guy will be rates a 3* player but then he gets an offer from one of the big name programs and they change him to a 4* on that basis.  And then everyone says look at how many  4* players the big name program gets!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MCO'sFan said:

His 99 ranking and Martin's 16 rankings are completely based on their draft ratings. There is no way BA admits to any suggestion that they were wrong. They will continue to rank Martin higher unless he (Martin) is a bust. That's always been their standard operating procedure.

 

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

What else would you use to rank them?  Draft order?

Are you suggesting they bump up Kjerstad simply because of where the O's picked him?

Given that they haven’t played a professional game yet, there’s no reason for BA to change their pre-draft opinion as to the order of the draft prospects.    The only new information here is how high Martin ranks compared to players who’ve already spent time in the minors.   

I don’t put particular weight on BA compared to other sources.    But obviously they are extremely high on Martin.    
 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Something I noticed is that Kjerstad is the highest rated switch-hitting prospect in the draft, and the only one that made the Fangraphs' numbers ranking / has an AV of 50 or better.

Adley Rutschman?  Switch hitter.

Imagine if those two pan out, having them back-to-back in the lineup.

Ken Singleton, Eddie Murray? For some reason thought Kjerstad was lefty swinger.

Edited by Ridgway22
clarity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ridgway22 said:

Ken Singleton, Eddie Murray? For some reason thought Kjerstad was lefty swinger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Ridgway22 said:

Ken Singleton, Eddie Murray? For some reason thought Kjerstad was lefty swinger.

Fangraphs made a mistake with that, as Kjerstad is not a switch hitter.  He’s a LH hitter.  I don’t think their high ranking of him is based on him being a switch hitter, because he’s not.  I think it was just a typo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

What else would you use to rank them?  Draft order?

Are you suggesting they bump up Kjerstad simply because of where the O's picked him?

I guess I am suggesting a few things. First, BA is extremely slow to admit that the had a prospect/draftee rated too high or too low. Second, I am suggesting that it is a farce to have Martin ranked 16th when three teams passed on him after Torkelson was taken (not just the O's). Signability has not been an issue with Martin so, it is safe to say that there seems to be at least somewhat of a consensus that he was not the second best prospect in the draft. But mostly, I really dislike BA's self-bias' it rivals only ESPN. BA shoves prospects down our throats until they are complete busts. They are slow (if ever) to recognize they were wrong. ESPN hypes whatever they are broadcasting to the point where I stopped watching it several years ago. 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frobby said:

 

Given that they haven’t played a professional game yet, there’s no reason for BA to change their pre-draft opinion as to the order of the draft prospects.    The only new information here is how high Martin ranks compared to players who’ve already spent time in the minors.   

I don’t put particular weight on BA compared to other sources.    But obviously they are extremely high on Martin.    
 

I couldn't agree more. You said much more succinctly that I did. I think they are stubbornly high on Martin. It made them look somewhat bad when three teams passed him over after Torkelson was taken. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Exactly. COVID restrictions really stopped the travel back and forth so it probably didn't make since to have Holt with the team and the minor leaguers. Either way, fraud is a really strong word to use and reeks of click bait by the NY Post.
    • That’s the thing, we have no idea when Holt was added to the coaches pension plan.  If it was when he was first hired in 2019 then it would seem more egregious, but if it was before this season as part of his promotion to Director of Pitching, then it seems more palatable, as his role was intended to blanket the majors & minors, and it sounds like the plan was for him to be in uniform on occasion, even if not once the game starts, since the number of coaches allowed during a game is limited. I just can’t see Elias potentially risking his career by covertly putting Holt in the coaches pension plan without getting approval from the Orioles HR department, or whoever is responsible for matters like this in the organization, along with MLB.  Elias is a smart guy, and only 2 years into what is likely his dream job as the GM of a Major League Baseball team.   I’m sure the other 3 coaches that were designated had to be approved as well, so if there was any issue with designating Holt as the 4th coach, you would think Elias and the O’s organization would have been told that when they first put him on the list of 4. To me, this article seems more like sensationalism, trying to tie Elias in with the Astros cheating scandal and making it seem like this situation with Holt is more of the same, as if anyone associated with the Astros must be deceptive and dishonest.  And the fact that they singled out Anthony Sanders as a coach that got  “screwed” seems like the lawsuit/claim of fraud could have come from his agent, because clearly this story was leaked by someone with an axe to grind.  But what if Holt was designated the 4th coach before Sanders got hired?  The point is, we don’t have all the facts, so to just assume Elias did this covertly to appease Holt without getting approval from anyone seems very irresponsible from a journalistic perspective.   Just the fact that this is being reported at all is obviously unsettling if you’re an O’s fan and a supporter of Elias, but I think this is more about sensationalism and click bait, by using the headline “Ex-Astros” and “fraud” to get people worked up about what is likely not much of anything.  It will be interesting to see if Elias or someone else with the organization talks about it and tries to clear it up, because you know that if he/they don’t, more and more people will start to wonder if this really could be a much more serious situation than it currently appears to be.
    • Yea, seems like an administrative issue with a potential fine at most. 
    • Remember when James Franklin was supposed to be the coach in waiting then wasn't? Lord almighty the MD decision makers for sports are awful.  BTW, Tagovailoa is awful. He looks scared, unprepared, inaccurate, and has really poor decision making skills. Good Lord, this is the guy who is the best they can find with all the transfers? Nice job there Locksley.
    • I am sorry but the word Fraud here is a little strong.  There are rules on which coaches can be listed to be eligible for the MLB pension and there maybe a question whether or not his role this past season qualifies or not.  I suspect the fact there were no minor leagues and the whole COVID situation may have changed what that role end up being probably is a factor.  To me fraud would be an intention to deceive what his role was, not whether it qualifies or not.  However in the world we live in today I guess it pays to use words like fraud. It makes the story more interesting. 
    • Here's something else to consider, maybe this was part of his agreement to come over to the Orioles? Maybe Elias told him he would use him in a "hybrid" role but due to COVID, that didn't really happen this year?  Maybe Sanders was told he would be hired but not on the pension plan for this year?  I'm going to wait until all the facts come out, but this piece to me makes it sound much worse. I mean, why bring up Sanders' race? What are they trying to insinuate by doing that? That seems unfair and it's doubtful that has anything to do with the decisions that were made. Either way, Elias does not seem like a guy who is going to risk something serious for a coaches pension situation. I'll let this play out.
    • Nothing new that I am aware of.   Not sure what will happen first, streaming or the end of the MASN court case. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...