Jump to content
weams

Orioles Sign Heston Kjerstad

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I took your comment as meaning that they might have taken the player they liked the most with every pick.

I don't believe you.  Every baseball fan in the world knows that the O's didn't take the player they thought was best with the 1st pick.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ruzious said:

I don't believe you.  Every baseball fan in the world knows that the O's didn't take the player they thought was best with the 1st pick.  

I bet there is an Oriole fan out there that believes that Kjerstad was at the top of the board.  Now that I stop and think I'll admit I don't think you are that fan, but I'm sure they exist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I bet there is an Oriole fan out there that believes that Kjerstad was at the top of the board.  Now that I stop and think I'll admit I don't think you are that fan, but I'm sure they exist.

I liked Lacy and Torkelson. I got scared on Hancock. I was not a Martin guy. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weams said:

I liked Lacy and Torkelson. I got scared on Hancock. I was not a Martin guy. 

I have a good feeling about Hancock but I only know what I read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Spending every last dollar is silly.  And it's probably pretty hard to understand what these guys will want and to work within your budget to get it done.  I'd be inclined to agree with you if they did something stupid like spent 6 million with a pool of 12 million...but leaving a few hundred thousand dollars on the table isn't the worst thing in the world.  

At the end of the day, do you like our draft picks?  That's what matters.  By and large, I do.  

I question weighing such a small sample size of data as heavily as they seemed to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I question weighing such a small sample size of data as heavily as they seemed to.

Certainly interesting that they seem to really buy into their projections for '20. This year is obviously an anomaly and given how much tends to change regarding prospect rankings between one year and the next it's impossible to say what they "should" have valued more. 

I'm fairly confident that if the full season played out the top 10 rankings from BA and other sources would have differed a good bit from where they ended up. It's possible Kjerstad would have still be ranked around 8-10th, but he could also have made a Bleday-like jump. Not saying he's the most likely candidate to improve his stock -- the same could be said for many of the other top prospects.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think they should, but the optics are better if they do.

I couldn’t care less.    Save the money and spend it on some more Rapsodo machines or whatever.   It’s the performance of these players that will determine if we spent our draft allotment well, not whether we spent every last dime allotted.   

Or, go find 20 more guys to sign for $20 k each.   
 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I couldn’t care less.    Save the money and spend it on some more Rapsodo machines or whatever.   It’s the performance of these players that will determine if we spent our draft allotment well, not whether we spent every last dime allotted.   

Or, go find 20 more guys to sign for $20 k each.   
 

You know as well as I do that those signings don't count against the pool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

You know as well as I do that those signings don't count against the pool.

It’s still money.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Frobby said:

It’s still money.  

I was joking when I wrote that but yea, it wouldn't be the same thing.  You have one chance a year to acquire these guys and best use the money you are allowed to spend.  You can buy cameras anytime.  You can sign random free agents anytime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I was joking when I wrote that but yea, it wouldn't be the same thing.  You have one chance a year to acquire these guys and best use the money you are allowed to spend.  You can buy cameras anytime.  You can sign random free agents anytime.

Here’s my point: you think you are going to need your whole allotment to sign the players you chose.    It turns out that you can sign the group for $400 k less than you thought.    Do you pay them the whole allotment to avoid the supposed embarrassment of underspending it, or do you take the savings and find something else to do with it?   I’d vote for the latter every time.    And in five years, I won’t remember what we paid these guys, but I will remember where we drafted them and take note of how well they’ve performed.   If Kjerstad turns into a good player, it won’t matter to me whether they paid him $5.2 mm or $5.6 mm.   

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Here’s my point: you think you are going to need your whole allotment to sign the players you chose.    It turns out that you can sign the group for $400 k less than you thought.    Do you pay them the whole allotment to avoid the supposed embarrassment of underspending it, or do you take the savings and find something else to do with it?   I’d vote for the latter every time.    And in five years, I won’t remember what we paid these guys, but I will remember where we drafted them and take note of how well they’ve performed.   If Kjerstad turns into a good player, it won’t matter to me whether they paid him $5.2 mm or $5.6 mm.   

I think you need to get better at figuring out costs.

Of course I'm not actually suggesting they give away money.

I think this franchise has a razor thin margin for error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being off by a few hundred K in a strange, data poor, truncated year seems OK to me. Granted, those are very much high leverage dollars to leave on the table, but it’s a very amorphous  leverage (particularly in that amount). You can give the real dollars to an intern to day trade  with to see what they can do with by next month.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Being off by a few hundred K in a strange, data poor, truncated year seems OK to me. Granted, those are very much high leverage dollars to leave on the table, but it’s a very amorphous  leverage (particularly in that amount). You can give the real dollars to an intern to day trade  with to see what they can do with by next month.

Also, they might not be over.  Everyone hasn't signed yet.  This is just speculation and chatter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheWall said:

Certainly interesting that they seem to really buy into their projections for '20. This year is obviously an anomaly and given how much tends to change regarding prospect rankings between one year and the next it's impossible to say what they "should" have valued more. 

I'm fairly confident that if the full season played out the top 10 rankings from BA and other sources would have differed a good bit from where they ended up. It's possible Kjerstad would have still be ranked around 8-10th, but he could also have made a Bleday-like jump. Not saying he's the most likely candidate to improve his stock -- the same could be said for many of the other top prospects.  

Tork's stock could've dropped, too. Lots of things could've changed if this virus hadn't hit. It's certainly gotta be one of the more difficult years for scouts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • o     On 2 consecutive nights, 2 different teams clinched themselves a 2020 playoff berth by beating the Yankees ........     (SEPTEMBER 24th)   Blue Jays Clinch Post-Season Berth with Win Over the Yankees (By Laura Armstrong) https://www.thestar.com/sports/bluejays/2020/09/24/blue-jays-clinch-post-season-berth-with-win-over-the-yankees.html     (SEPTEMBER 25th)   Marlins Beat Yankees in Extra-Innings, Clinch First Playoff Berth Since 2003 (By Jordan McPherson) https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/mlb/miami-marlins/article245998685.html     o
    • o   (SEPTEMBER 24th)   The Blue Jays beat the Yankees in Buffalo last night, punching their ticket to the 2020 American League post-season tournament.   Blue Jays Clinch Post-Season Berth with Win Over the Yankees (By Laura Armstrong) https://www.thestar.com/sports/bluejays/2020/09/24/blue-jays-clinch-post-season-berth-with-win-over-the-yankees.html       o
    • Yeah... check out baseballafterdark.com   😂
    • o   Very early in the 2020 season as a COVID-laden Florida Marlins were shut down indefinitely because of the disease ...... nobody was sure whether or not they would be able to continue playing in (and completing) the season. Now, they have qualified for the National League post-season tournament.   Marlins Beat Yankees in Extra-Innings, Clinch First Playoff Berth Since 2003 (By Jordan McPherson) https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/mlb/miami-marlins/article245998685.html   o
    • This is the Orioles' fourth losing season in a row. Someone who's been a fan for 50 years undoubtedly remembers that the team went 14 seasons in a row with losing records from 1998 through 2011. Then the next year they made the playoffs and won their first round game and all of a sudden it was a lot of fun again. The good times will come again.  Can't guarantee it'll be next year, but they will come.  
    • You’re right about some things, wrong about others. watch and see if things get better. I think they will.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...