Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MurphDogg

9/4 Player Pool - Lowther added

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I guess you went as good at math as I have you cried for.  

2020 wasted year.  23

2021 full "development" year in AAA.  24

2022 gamed service time year 25 

2024  year 2- 26

2025 year 3-  27

2026  year 4- 28

2027 year 5 - 29

2028 year 6- 30

2029 year 7- 31

 

That's the plan you want to follow right?

 

I would think that Elias and staff will judge if Diaz needs a full year at AAA in 2021 after spending two months with older players at Bowie.  Plus whatever Diaz does this off season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I would think that Elias and staff will judge if Diaz needs a full year at AAA in 2021 after spending two months with older players at Bowie.  Plus whatever Diaz does this off season.

I don't know, everything you've been saying since Elias took over indicates to me that you would be heavily in favor of the progression I've outlined. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't know, everything you've been saying since Elias took over indicates to me that you would be heavily in favor of the progression I've outlined. 

 

What can I say.  You obviously know me much better than I know myself.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

What can I say.  You obviously know me much better than I know myself.

Evidently you pay even less attention to your posts than I do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weams said:

 

 

 

And two of those guys still on the 60 are Blach and Wilkerson.  So we have PLENTY of room to add some young guys to the 60 so they can go to Bowie and get hands on coaching.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Bradish but not Lowther?

Elias read my criticism of the Bundy trade so he's trying to make it look better by putting Bradish on the 60 man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Elias read my criticism of the Bundy trade so he's trying to make it look better by putting Bradish on the 60 man.

Na. He just wanted to give me a chance to debate you on the subject. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Bradish but not Lowther?

Elias said on the radio a few days ago that Lowther would be added at some point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I don’t care about inning so much as pitch count. The  manager knows a pitchers maximum number of effective pitches, and that number is higher or lower based on effectiveness during that game. We don’t know that number, but Hyde does. When he starts the inning where that effective limit is nigh, get a guy up, because even if the pitcher ends the inning clean he will have reached his maximum, and the new guy will start the next inning anyway. there are always surprises of course but by definition they are unexpected, and shouldn’t drastically alter the basic plan. If the Pitcher has a good five pitch inning, no reason not to let him start the next inning with the same parameters, if he has a 5 pitch inning with three very loud outs, he’s done and the new guy takes the next inning, and so on. so yes, I would have had a guy up in the 5th
    • I think he may have had him without Galvis. Either way, I’ve been more worried about him getting to balls and his internal clock, and they both looked good on that play.
    • Something some folks thought they would never see. https://mlb-cuts-diamond.mlb.com/FORGE/2021/2021-04/21/f5024f8f-4d521f5b-fc41581d-csvm-diamondx64-asset_1280x720_59_4000K.mp4 No the runner had no business going and a cut off man was involved but still, it counts.
    • Tommy Milone could be in line for the W tonight against Boston. He came in after the opener and the Jays are up 4-1 in the 5th.
    • I'm sick of us crying broke. No excuse. This guy had 3 years a negative WAR and a fourth year where is WAR was 0.2. Not a guy who is going to help you much. I do admit I thought he was older but that changes nothing. I want young exciting players. Maikel Franco is not the kind of guy that you sign.
    • And IMO, we got worse on offense. We can only hope Hays, Mountcastle and Stewart all get hot and have decent numbers. I have about lost hope in Cisco ever being a productive major leaguer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...