Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MurphDogg

9/4 Player Pool - Lowther added

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The real question is if they have any intention of using them 

 

Well unless Santander and Dwight Smith Jr. show up pretty soon, they're going to have to. There were only 2 active outfielders (Hays and Stewart) before they were added. 

For this reason I think Wilkerson is about as close to a lock for the 30-man as possible. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The real question is if they have any intention of using them 

 

Before Covid hit, I think a lot of us thought Williams had a very good chance to make the team as a backup outfielder.

And I think most of us expected that Mountcastle would stay down some period of time for service time, and then come up to the majors.

Why would that have changed in any way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

We knew that sometimes prospects slump or get out of whack and need to try to reset things and fix what's wrong.  Mullins isn't the prospect he was a year ago, but he might be salvageable.

Remember when Cal hit .150 through his first 120-odd plate appearances in the majors?

Wish we had Earl around to give his stamp of approval and keep playing him (Mullins.)

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, scOtt said:

Wish we had Earl around to give his stamp of approval and keep playing him (Mullins.)

Didn’t realize Mason Williams was 29....he’s obviously a now or never kind of guy. He can almost be labeled AAAA now. 
 

Sounds like the plan is for Mountcastle to get some significant ABs just looking at the https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/baltimore-orioles 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Didn’t realize Mason Williams was 29....he’s obviously a now or never kind of guy. He can almost be labeled AAAA now. 
 

Sounds like the plan is for Mountcastle to get some significant ABs just looking at the https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/baltimore-orioles 

Williams is a viable inexpensive guy that can be plugged in for this season. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats with the Orioles playing dumb with all this "we have ghost outfielders because we don't have enough players"?

Like... you filled your roster 3/4 of the way, why don't you fix this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Whats with the Orioles playing dumb with all this "we have ghost outfielders because we don't have enough players"?

Like... you filled your roster 3/4 of the way, why don't you fix this?

Wouldn't want to give away any competitive advantage and let teams prepare for Mullins. SURPRISE!!!!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aristotelian said:

Wouldn't want to give away any competitive advantage and let teams prepare for Mullins. SURPRISE!!!!

#Wildcard2020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh is the only other team I can see that has taken the same tack as the O's and not had any prospects added to the roster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Didn’t realize Mason Williams was 29....he’s obviously a now or never kind of guy. He can almost be labeled AAAA now. 
 

Sounds like the plan is for Mountcastle to get some significant ABs just looking at the https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/baltimore-orioles 

Mountcastle's 23.  He needs MLB at bats now or he'll be too old to be a top prospect.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Mountcastle's 23.  He needs MLB at bats now or he'll be too old to be a top prospect.

Exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Mountcastle's 23.  He needs MLB at bats now or he'll be too old to be a top prospect.

Isn't that backwards?  If Mountcastle were one of the top prospects in baseball he would have many MLB at bats by 23 or 24.  One of the reasons Elias could leave him in AAA all year last year is that he wasn't running roughshod over the league, yes he's pretty young but he's a 1B/LF/DH with the 40th-best OPS in the IL, 4th or 5th-best on the Tides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Pittsburgh is the only other team I can see that has taken the same tack as the O's and not had any prospects added to the roster.

O's also seem to be the only team where without intersquad game footage other than a view videos posted by Roch. I can't find any. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • And this, my friends, is why Chris Davis won’t be cut this winter.   Starting in May means the O’s would save $4-6 mm off his salary, assuming the salaries are cut proportionally to games missed.   By the way, I don’t know if that is a correct assumption, because I’m not sure if the deal that MLB cut with the players for 2020 carries over into 2021 or not if games are missed.    
    • My quibble here is that the term “market rate” means what teams are willing to pay.    I’d say teams don’t pay these players their theoretical value.    But we mean the same thing.    I don’t think the market is static.   Two players could have identical performance and demand could be higher or lower depending on circumstances.    Let’s say you have two players who each were worth 1.0 WAR.    One is a DH, the other is a middle infielder.    Those two players may have equal value hypothetically, but one could be in greater demand than the other depending on what’s available in the market.   A team that already has two DH types and a shortage of middle infielders is not going to be willing to pay the same amount for each player.       
    • Most of that abundance is/was RHB. a lefty replacement for Nuñez is a bit better balance. 
    • Just because a player is worth a certain amount of money according to WAR, doesn't mean teams are going to line up to pay a player that amount. A win is worth what, $8 or $9 million according to WAR? So according to that formula, Nunez is worth somewhere between $4 and $9 million. But most teams don't pay players worth two wins or less anything near their market rate. Sure, there might be an exception or two, or someone might be worth two wins or less who's finishing out an expensive contract that was priced based on them being worth more wins than that. Successful teams (without enormous budgets, and even then they still generally don't do this) pay free agent stars and superstars their market worth by WAR, and try to get the two win and under guys for dirt cheap to fill out the roster. This is what is meant by WAR not being linear. Guys like Renato Nunez aren't going to sign for anywhere from $4-$9 million, because it's not hard to stumble around in your farm system or on waivers and find guys for league minimum who have a good chance to be worth a similar amount. All of MLB just passed on the opportunity to pay Nunez a $2-$3 million salary and control his rights for two more seasons after next for the cost of a waiver claim. I imagine if he signs with a team, it will be for less than that amount. You can talk until you're blue in the face about how the formula dictates he's worth that, but if no one is willing to pay a price because they can get the same thing for less money somewhere else, then it's asinine to insist that they should have paid him $2-$3 million And come on. I don't think the Orioles are unique in their DH situation, and they've got a ton of corner outfielders and first basemen who need bats. We weren't the only team with "room" for him. Would they have kept him if they could have continued to pay him league minimum? Probably. What you're missing is that salary and production are two sides of the same coin. Yes, the Orioles cut Nunez because of money. Because his likely production was replaceable for less than $2-$3 million dollars
    • Nevin is a prospect at 23 years old.  1B is his best position.  He will probably stays on the 40 man roster all year. Shaw is an organizational player at 27.  His best position is Bat thus DH.  He is likely to be DFA'd to get him off the 40 man  roster and to Norfolk.
    • Barry Bonds did ok...    
    • If Ayala can improve his shooting that would be awesome.  Today was a good start.  I think Wiggins needs to improve his handles and slashing game to be the scorer that would need.  His catch and shoot game is pure.   Gonna need Marial to improve his offensive game as well.  We already know he will defend the rim (theoretically).  Needs to work on his conditioning.  Ultimately I think our lack of interior presence will be our demise, unless Smith and Scott really ball their face off. We have that Swiss guy Revas as well, I'm not expecting much from him though.  The lack of backcourt depth also might hurt unless Dockery and Smart grow quickly.  Can Ayala be the primary ball handler and distributor?  Maybe. I don't think this team will fall off as badly as most think.  Like you said, Morsell/Ayala/Wiggins will keep us in most games.  If Scott and Hamilton (who was a top 100 recruit going into BC) can step up then I think we could surprise some people.  I see us sneaking into the tournament as a 7-10 seed.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...