Jump to content
MurphDogg

MASN broadcast overhaul - Palmer, Thorne, others out

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

The reasons to watch this lousy team play a partial schedule in empty ballparks are disappearing.  There's always the chance to learn something about cooking or music or beer on the game threads.

Yeah, just listening to @Can_of_corn drone on about living the high life is riveting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

You KNOW fellas at home could do it better? Doubt that’ll work out as well as you’re suggesting. It’s a lot harder than just talking. 

It’s hard for guys who don’t have the skills, but these guys do have the skills and they are still terrible. The people who make the hiring decisions are idiots.

You don’t want someone with a monotonic voice, and you don’t want someone who doesn’t talk in an engaging way.

Kevin Brown is unlistenable. He doesn’t seem interested, he doesn’t say anything interesting and he doesn’t say it in an interesting way and he doesn’t have an interesting voice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only upshot of this is getting to hear Ben some more. 
 

Look, everything about this year is a Dumpster fire. Not just this baseball year, but 2020 as a whole. There isn’t much bad news that really surprises me at this point, so when we hear next month that Kjerstad has quit baseball to dedicate his life to engineering a more potent form of glysophate, I doubt I’ll even blink. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Lucky_13 said:

This is most likely covid related, especially because Dan Connolly tweeted Palmer and others may join some broadcasts via zoom. It sucks but those guys are all high risk. 

I have the feeling Palmer's earned the right to go on broadcasting for as long as he wants in Baltimore, so I doubt this is him being let go. 

He’s earned the right because of his longevity, but mostly because he’s the best announcer we’ve ever had. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, waroriole said:

He’s earned the right because of his longevity, but mostly because he’s the best announcer we’ve ever had. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Philip said:

It’s hard for guys who don’t have the skills, but these guys do have the skills and they are still terrible. The people who make the hiring decisions are idiots.

You don’t want someone with a monotonic voice, and you don’t want someone who doesn’t talk in an engaging way.

Kevin Brown is unlistenable. He doesn’t seem interested, he doesn’t say anything interesting and he doesn’t say it in an interesting way and he doesn’t have an interesting voice.

They should get Weasel from WHFS.  He has an interesting voice.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

We’ve been blessed with a lot of great announcers.    For my money, Jon Miller was the best.    But for a TV color guy, Palmer is top-notch.    He’s perfectly suited for that role.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, VaBird1 said:

They should get Weasel from WHFS.  He has an interesting voice.

Voices need to be distinctive. I like Steve Milewski’s voice, and yes at least interesting to listen to.

There’s a lot of acting involved in radio work, because you’re not just reliving the play, You are accentuating the emotion of the moment. Steve does that pretty well, Gary does it brilliantly, Joe Angel did it very well, Brown doesn’t do it at all. Siri Is more involved.

What you say is also extremely important. How many different ways can you describe “the pitch” how many different ways can you say, “the pitcher is now throwing to home plate”

I came up with seven or eight different ways just in the span of a few seconds, and then I thought about modulating my voice while using the same words to create another set of possibilities.

Brown doesn’t change how he describes things at all.  It’s like he’s deliberately trying to be boring.A good radio announcer can make even the most repeated motion interesting. 

How many different ways can you describe a routine pop up. Even if the act itself is probably the most boring thing in baseball aside from a foul ball, it’s possible to make it interesting just by the way you use your voice. Melewski does that pretty well, Brown doesn’t do any of that.

I don’t usually watch on TV, so the TV guys don’t bother me too much. The radio broadcasters for the Orioles are awful. I do not know what the hiring parameters were, but the result was mostly a collection of guys who damage the game experience.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, just listening to @Can_of_corn drone on about living the high life is riveting.

It's all relative, isn't it? Compared to discussions of games that are pretty much over in the early innings, that stuff's not bad. I also enjoy, up to a point, the running commentary on Mike Bordick.

If I had better judgment or just a little willpower, I wouldn't have been watching those games at all after the Orioles fell behind by half a dozen runs in the early innings. My performance in shutting off the games over the last couple of years has been pretty poor. I hope to do better this year.

That reminds me: when they let the fans' representative in on the CBA negotiations, that rep should ask that MLB adopt a mercy rule. :disco:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

The only upshot of this is getting to hear Ben some more. 
 

Look, everything about this year is a Dumpster fire. Not just this baseball year, but 2020 as a whole. There isn’t much bad news that really surprises me at this point, so when we hear next month that Kjerstad has quit baseball to dedicate his life to engineering a more potent form of glysophate, I doubt I’ll even blink. 

Kjerstad is working on high quality H2O

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoy Thorne and Palmer, but we recently cut the cord so I wasn't going to see/hear them anyway.  Still, broadcasts won't be the same without them.  I particularly enjoy Palmer, because he has the stroke to not pull any punches and not fear reprisal from ownership or executive management.  Glad to see Garceau back calling play by play, I've missed him since the Ravens transitioned to Gerry Sandusky.

Maybe one of these days MASN will get it's head out of it's figurative rear end and offer a streaming package.  My money must not interest them, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It could happen, we've already heard Mike Trout but as a SS two years running.
    • I’m just waiting for them to call a guy a more athletic Bo Jackson.  
    • o     Like his teammate )Tyler Glasnow, )Blake Snell )led the Major Leagues in Wild Pitches ...... but also like his (seemingly) wild-throwing teammate, he rarely hits a batter with a pitch. In his 5 Major League seasons between 2016 and 2020, Snell has only 2 Hit Batsmen in 556 Innings Pitched. )    Tony Gonsolin )has excellent raw numbers from the 2020 regular season. He had a 2.31 ERA and an 0.836 WHIP over 46.67 innings Pitched. And that's only a slight improvement from the 2019 regular season, when he tallied a 2.93 ERA and a 1.025 WHIP over 40 innings Pitched ....... he seems to be consistently excellent.     (WORLD SERIES) )))))) [GAME TWO]   TAMPA BAY DEVIL R AYS Austin Meadows - DH Brandon Lowe - 2B      Randy Arozarena - LF 崔志萬 - 1B  Manuel Margot Gomez - RF Joseph Patrick "J.P." Wendle - 3B Willy Rafael Luna Adames - SS Kevin James "K.J." Kiermaier - CF  Michael Zunino - C Blake Ashton Snell - LHP )) (4-2, 3.24 ERA) ) *   * )) Led the Major Leagues in Wild Pitches (7)   LOS ANGELES DODGERS Markus Lynn Betts - RF Corey Seager - SS Justin Turner - 3B Maxwell Muncy - 1B William Smith - C Cody James "C.J." Bellinger - CF Allen Lorenz "A.J." Pollock - DH Enrique Javier "E.J." Hernandez - 2B Christopher Armand Taylor, Jr. - LF  Anthony D. Gonsolin - RHP )) (2-2, 2.31 ERA)   https://www.mlb.com/starting-lineups   o
    • Yep, same thing when folks call a mid to late first round pick a bust because they are merely a ML player and not a really good ML player.
    • I think generally people tend to overestimate the number of players that a good farm system typically produces over a given period of time.   Let’s define a 50 as a guy who produces 10 WAR in the 6+ years he’s under team control.    In 2013, 200+ players debuted, but only 33 met that standard.    So basically, an average of one per team per year.   
    • As a kid of the 1970's, my hatred of the Yankees is well ingrained by now.  I happily vote WS where the Skanks lost pretty high.  Not higher than those our Orioles won, perhaps, but no Yankee win would occur before either of those two criteria are met.  And then there is every other team in the league to consider ahead of any NY win.  I don't think a Yankee win would even occur in my list... Sadly, it looks like Scott Van Pelt only had one measly vote.
    • It was 2nd division starter or utility guy, right? And with a 50 ceiling. That's a ML player who, best case, is a good starter on a good team or likely is still a guy with some value to a ML team. Especially if he can hold his own in the outfield. My take here is that: 1) Tony's understandably being conservative in general on this list because he hasn't seen a lot of these guys for a full year. 2) He's going by what he's heard. 3) There are guys lower on this list that are a bit farther away but who have higher potential. 4) Vavra, based on Tony and rankings from other sites with some credibility, has some potential to be a real contributor to the ML team within 2 years. I actually think Tony's grade is pretty accurate based on the feedback, but whether he should be ranked over Baumler, Mayo, Rom, Smith, Hall, Wells, Bradish, Stowers, Hernaiz, Haskin and others is up for debate and, ultimately, not really important. Heck, at least one site has him at 7. They must think he's decent. All those guys have risk and they all have had a big layoff from baseball, or at least from being seen. Vavra got put here because he's closer, he has produced on the field, and thus has somewhat lower risk, is my guess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...