Jump to content
MurphDogg

MASN broadcast overhaul - Palmer, Thorne, others out

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Yardball85 said:

Ben is great.  He's no Palmer, but when you have an A+ in Palmer, it is hard to beat that.

I like Garceau.  He's a Baltimore guy, he's been working in Baltimore for years.  But he just has no enthusiasm or excitement on his calls.  Throne or even Hutner would've been a lot of fun for the success we've been having.

To be fair to Garceau, there is zero atmosphere to draw off of.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

To be fair to Garceau, there is zero atmosphere to draw off of.

 

That is totally fair.  He works great with Ben.  Last night's broadcast especially was a joy to watch as the two of them interacted well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

That is totally fair.  He works great with Ben.  Last night's broadcast especially was a joy to watch as the two of them interacted well.

It also has to be odd calling the game from a different stadium.

That being said, I believe your post would be accurate if there were a lot of fans though.  I don’t think Garceau will be that super excitable guy but I do think he will be more excitable, under normal circumstances, than he has been this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only watched/listened to the TV broadcasts. I'd give Ben an "A" and Garceau a "C+" (right in the meaty party of the curve).

Garceau is fine (and a million times better than Hunter), but he just doesn't bring enough enthusiasm, IMO.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, canonfaz said:

I've only watched/listened to the TV broadcasts. I'd give Ben an "A" and Garceau a "C+" (right in the meaty party of the curve).

Garceau is fine (and a million times better than Hunter), but he just doesn't bring enough enthusiasm, IMO.

 

Hunter is an acquired taste lol.

I did not have cable growing up, s Hunter's voice reminds of me of being seven or eight years old, coming home from day camp, and listening to an Orioles game in my room.  It's more of a nostalgia thing, but I like him.  Even though he's cheesy as hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Hunter is an acquired taste lol.

I did not have cable growing up, s Hunter's voice reminds of me of being seven or eight years old, coming home from day camp, and listening to an Orioles game in my room.  It's more of a nostalgia thing, but I like him.  Even though he's cheesy as hell.

Haha. To each his own!

Jon Miller is that voice for me when I was growing up and listening to games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, canonfaz said:

Haha. To each his own!

Jon Miller is that voice for me when I was growing up and listening to games.

Chuck Thompson.  Ain't the beer cold!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, canonfaz said:

Haha. To each his own!

Jon Miller is that voice for me when I was growing up and listening to games.

Ah, I like Miller too.  Great voice. 

My top announcers for the Orioles in my lifetime is still Palmer as color analyst and Thorne for TV and Angel for radio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Hunter is an acquired taste lol.

I did not have cable growing up, s Hunter's voice reminds of me of being seven or eight years old, coming home from day camp, and listening to an Orioles game in my room.  It's more of a nostalgia thing, but I like him.  Even though he's cheesy as hell.

No he’s not. He sucks. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

No he’s not. He sucks. 

Riiiight, liking an announcer is completely, 100% objective, and there is no room for subjectivity in such an analysis!! 🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, canonfaz said:

I've only watched/listened to the TV broadcasts. I'd give Ben an "A" and Garceau a "C+" (right in the meaty party of the curve).

Garceau is fine (and a million times better than Hunter), but he just doesn't bring enough enthusiasm, IMO.

 

An ‘A’ for Ben?! I like him but don’t know if I can go THAT far. He is a master at stating the obvious and he uses the term ‘melted that ball’ at least twice a game. I’ll give him a solid ‘B.’
 

the more I think about it thought, the more I wonder if getting rid of Palmer and Thorne is a permanent move, perhaps at least requested by the FO. The whole Davis/Palmer beef had to have been deeply distracting for the team and Ben Macdonald is a much safer personality who will never go rogue like that. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, joelala said:

the more I think about it thought, the more I wonder if getting rid of Palmer and Thorne is a permanent move, perhaps at least requested by the FO. The whole Davis/Palmer beef had to have been deeply distracting for the team and Ben Macdonald is a much safer personality who will never go rogue like that. 

I think the team necessarily was planning for an eventual transition, given that Thorne is 72 and Palmer 74.    They already had Joe Angel  and Fred Manfra both walk away (by their own choice, so far as we know) at age 70.    So, I think the plan was to have “tryouts” this year for several people, mix them in with the veteran announcers and then choose the ones who would eventually succeed the vets.    But COVID and the shortened season accelerated the process.    I don’t know if they’ll entirely dump Thorne and Palmer next year, but they might cut them back from their 2019 levels.    And, it’s also possible that either of them might decide they’ve done this for long enough and choose to walk away.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

think the team necessarily was planning for an eventual transition, given that Thorne is 72 and Palmer 74.

How old is Garceau though? He's certainly no spring chicken. I like McDonald, but SG has been pretty terrible behind the mic. Makes me honestly miss Jim Hunter *shudders*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I'm more confident than ever that it's the right way to go. I mean, I might have picked a different reliever who was pitching better. But "these guys are ruining MLB" is saying that we need to ignore the data and the information and the logic and gut it out like a man and win it all, baby.  You know, like Grady Little and Pedro.
    • The postseason is all about second-guessing the playbook that you followed all year because it's not about numbers and data and track records, it's about setting up the revenue stream from the inevitable Disney movie about your improbable storybook run.
    • Oh, and the Colome signing would be nonsense.  Paying $10M a year for a modern closer with 7 K/9 during his peak seasons?  You might as well set the money on fire.  He had an 0.81 ERA, so his agent will be selling the heck out of that while doing magic tricks to get you to avoid looking at his 16 strikeouts in 22 innings.
    • The Orioles, optimistically, were a 60-something win team in 2020.  They need to add roughly 25 wins to be even a wildcard contender. Bauer/LeMahieu/Colome get you maybe 12 wins, if you're being charitable.  And you are running with the slightly crazy idea that a smaller-market 60-something win team is going to be able to lure three top free agents in one offseason. So you still need 10-20 wins of improvement out of the existing roster.  I suppose that could happen, but do you really think Severino, Mountcastle, Mullins, Stewart, Iglesias, Santander etc are likely to be a lot better over 162 games?  Or that Mancini comes back from cancer and is immediately really good?  Or that Cobb's arm stays attached? I think the realistic '21 ceiling is around .500, more likely case around 70 wins.  They're not signing any top free agents, and it would be really positive if they got a lot more growth than backsliding.
    • Anderson has been worn down so much in the earlier part of the playoffs. Everything about it was a horrible move.
    • You are correct.   https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/09/these-three-on-os-farm-looked-to-improve-even-without-games.html   I guess he is talking about Fall Instructs.  
    • https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/09/find-a-way-farm-pitchers-get-their-work-in-even-without-games.html
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...