Jump to content
drjohnnyfeva

Win predictions?

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, bpilktree said:

We will have to lose the next 43 games to get to that.  

Yeah....I figured someone would call me on it sooner or later! 😂 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2020 at 1:15 PM, webbrick2010 said:

Wow just looked at the roster

Has to be the worst opening day roster in O's history?

Last years team minus Villar and Mancini.

Iglesias will be an improvement over Richie Martin

But wow is that the worst pitching staff in ML history?

16-44

 

Per Roch

 

Quote

The doubters keep fueling the Orioles. Haters gonna motivate.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/22/2020 at 10:34 AM, Moose Milligan said:

This is a dog$#%@ team.  15 wins.  

 

On 7/22/2020 at 3:10 PM, Roll Tide said:

10-50

 

On 7/23/2020 at 1:15 PM, webbrick2010 said:

Wow just looked at the roster
Has to be the worst opening day roster in O's history?
Last years team minus Villar and Mancini.
Iglesias will be an improvement over Richie Martin
But wow is that the worst pitching staff in ML history?

16-44

So far three people's predictions have been surpassed.   The next few wins will start eliminating more and more people.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SteveA said:

So far three people's predictions have been surpassed.   The next few wins will start eliminating more and more people.  

I'm going down shortly, I said 17.  I think I both got unlucky (in projecting, not for the Orioles) and underestimated the impact of using like 8 fresh pitchers every game because of expanded rosters.  Despite two of their primary starters being horrific and several others not exactly lighting the world afire, the team ERA is a run better than last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t see that I made a prediction in this thread, but here’s what I said in another thread:

Overall, I don’t see that a fluke scenario where we play .400+ baseball for 60 games has much chance to occur.    It hasn’t happened any time in the last two years, and I think the talent level on this year’s team is probably the lowest it’s been when you factor in the Villar and Bundy trades and Mancini’s illness.     So, put me down for 20-40 or worse.  

Looks like I’ve got an excellent chance of being wrong.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm going down shortly, I said 17.  I think I both got unlucky (in projecting, not for the Orioles) and underestimated the impact of using like 8 fresh pitchers every game because of expanded rosters.  Despite two of their primary starters being horrific and several others not exactly lighting the world afire, the team ERA is a run better than last year.

I'm not sure I understand this.  Overall runs per game is down a little bit this year (4.68 vs 4.83 last year).  Not real significant.  Are you saying that teams with bad pitching are somehow able to mask it and win more games than they should with the expanded roster?   Why are the Orioles doing a better job of this than, say, the Red Sox?  

I mean last year we were the 29th best team, give or take, and this year we are around 20th.  If we have somehow benefited from being able to hide bad pitching with an expanded roster, why have other teams failed to do this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was definitely wrong, and glad to be so. I'll never root against winning. I just didn't think they would bring up some of the younger players.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/22/2020 at 10:16 AM, jamalshw said:

I am a lot less optimistic than most it seems. The Orioles have one of the toughest (if not the toughest) schedules in the game. While the Sox's rotation is suspect, they still have a solid offense. The Yankees and Rays are both good. The Jays, I think, will be much improved. The only team the Orioles play that is not at least a solid squad is Miami. Add in Means and Harvey starting off with arm fatigue, no Mancini and a rotation that is sending Tommy Malone out on opening day (yes, I know that's due to circumstances)...

Overall, I will be happy if the team gets to 20 wins, but expect something more like 17-18 and wouldn't be that surprised if it came in under that. The team was 19-41 through the first 60 games last year and in 2018. 

 

On 7/22/2020 at 10:46 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

21 wins is a game better than last year's pace, and 57 wins over a full 162.

The midpoint of my projected distribution is 17 wins.

 

On 7/22/2020 at 10:59 AM, JR Oriole said:

I think 17-43 is what we are looking at, assuming the season plays out.  A lot of tough teams on our schedule. 

 

On 7/22/2020 at 1:23 PM, osfan83 said:

I think 18 is about right.....but as bad as the pitching is, 10 is not out of the question. 

 

On 7/22/2020 at 2:49 PM, Lucky_13 said:

Yeah that's likely one of the worst case scenarios.  But with how tough the schedule is, lack of pitching depth, and the front office's hesitation to promote even lower end pitching prospects like Akin, I can't see it going much better.  More like 16-18 wins. 

 

On 7/22/2020 at 2:53 PM, bpilktree said:

The Red Sox and Marlins are bad but the rest decent to very good.  I will go with 18-42. 

 

On 7/22/2020 at 3:11 PM, CarrRun49 said:

Need what you are drinking.  17 wins

 

On 7/23/2020 at 11:02 AM, Chuck A said:

16 or 17.  Tough schedule.

Friday night when we won our 17th game, three people were kicked off the island because their prediction had been surpassed.

Now two days later we have 19 wins, 8 more people bite the dust.

One more win means we will at least match our .333 win% from last year.   Two more wins means we will surpass it and have our second conecutive year of improved winning% under Elias/Hyde, and also that we will have hit the "over" on the preseason Vegas total which was either 20 or 20.5 depending on where you looked.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/5/2020 at 7:37 AM, Frobby said:

LOL!    Yes, I’m wrong much of the time.    

Rule #1 of husbandhood: “when you’re wrong, apologize. When you’re right..wait... you’re never right.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems I didn’t post a guess at all.  I was thinking 26-28, but I cant prove it without digging way too deep into my past comments, so I’ll just say I was hoping to win as many as possible, and I thought we were going to be good enough that I’m mildly disappointed at 4 under .500 right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/5/2020 at 12:03 AM, SteveA said:

 

 

So far three people's predictions have been surpassed.   The next few wins will start eliminating more and more people.  

Happy to be wrong!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Given our division, until we are league average players in the international signing market then we are always going to face long rebuilds. 
    • I tend to agree that Sisco is not .100 worse at the big league level than he was in the minors. Seems to me that he is likely the kind of guy that you need to go with everyday. 525 ABs over for seasons means he's played sporadically at best.
    • The answer is so obvious that “yellow” shouldn’t even have been an option. BTW when I first saw this I initially thought the first option was “Nate’s HAIR is called Fair.” And I was, like,”well duh. Of COURSE it’s fair. He’s Blonde.” If we subtract the no-brainer answer, Nate’s home run would be my choice.  in 2014, even without Manny, we won 96 games, and the Royals were so lucky that I’m not sure a phalanx of archangels could have beaten them. In 2016, we were enjoying a dead cat bounce,  and even if we’d pulled off the WC game, it’s doubtful we’d have gone any farther. But in 2012, we had a great team, we were on the rise, and the Yankees had serious problems. I’m not sure we’d have gone on to win that game 5, but golly, that would have been one of the all time sweet memories, regardless of what happened next.  
    • That’s the one I would choose if it was an option. The 1996 ALCS might have swung differently if Richie Garcia does his job.
    • They all sucked! But I’m going with Nelson Cruz.   Also ...missing is the Mayer interference not called!
    • The bigger impact was the repercussions of the mistake internally. I feel like Angelos got gun shy in free agency after the Albert Belle deal. But with the Glenn Davis trade they gutted the depth of a team that had trouble developing talent. As a kid after Cal Ripken there was Boddicker , Mussina, and a whole lot of disappointment in player drafting and development.
    • I know most will say Chris Davis but some things cannot be measured  by cold hard dollars.  The Glenn Davis trade not only  was lopsided with the talent the Franchise gave up for him, but also the psychological damage it did to the fan base.  Glen Davis was to be the RH power hitter needed, it seemed like forever,  and was thought to be a sure thing, but was not to be.  I know I felt crushed for such a long time by how that turned out.  We all make mistakes and both of these situations were mistakes,  big time.                        
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...