Jump to content
SteveA

Attention Chris Davis

Recommended Posts

Bryce Harper just came to the plate with a man on first.  He was 0 for the season so far.  They were playing an extreme shift on him.

He laid a perfect bunt down the third base line for a hit.  

Realmuto followed with a 3 run HR.

So Chris Davis doesn't want to do that because it's "not his game".

Didn't stop Bryce Harper 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure what to think of Brandon Hyde yet, and considering what he has to work with, you should probably get the benefit of the doubt. However, it reflects very badly on him that he lets Davis continue to do the things that he does, even though they continue to fail.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe it's Bryce Harper's game?

Also Davis is wicked slow, I don't see him legging out many bunt singles.

He would have beaten this one out.  He probably would have gotten to first before someone got over to the 3rd base bag to pick it up where it had rolled to a stop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brandon Hyde is not going to tell Chris Davis to lay down a bunt.  They aren't interested in CD doing that.  They are interested in CD hitting HR's and driving in runs.  Since he can't do that AND won't take it on himself to try to do something different, we're stuck with him until he decides to go.  I just wish they would park him on the bench and move on or just release him.  He is the most enormous albatross in the history of albatrosses. :)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Davis as a hitter is worthless right now. Better to skip him in the order. Bunt singles are better than that. He needs a hole on the right side of the infield to drive in runs now. Keep getting bunt singles down there and the shift moves. Now his percentage of getting a hit goes up. At the end of last season, Hyde should have told Davis that until he could bunt down there his ass would be on the bench five days out of seven. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Davis as a hitter is worthless right now. Better to skip him in the order. Bunt singles are better than that. He needs a hole on the right side of the infield to drive in runs now. Keep getting bunt singles down there and the shift moves. Now his percentage of getting a hit goes up. At the end of last season, Hyde should have told Davis that until he could bunt down there his ass would be on the bench five days out of seven. 

I don't see why folks think that bunt singles are automatic.  They aren't.  Sac bunts aren't automatic and half the time the opposing team is trying to help facilitate them.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is 0-6 and has hit two ball hard not really sure why people on him already. He hit well in spring so let’s hope he can contribute some this season but no need to start complaining 6 at bats in.

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe it's Bryce Harper's game?

Also Davis is wicked slow, I don't see him legging out many bunt singles.

Sure he could, if they’re shifting and the bunt was half decent.     I’d like to see him try it a couple of times but I’m not expecting him to do it.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Davis has tried bunting before and he has been unsuccessful. I don't know why people think bunting won't go poorly again. It was a good idea for Davis to try, but did not go well.

I think a lot of Davis' issues are between the ears. He used the whole field better before he let the shift get in his head. Davis is thinking too much at the plate. He needs to just be natural. I think he we all agree he is probably done, but I don't think expanding his thinking at the plate is going to help. He is better when he is reactionary.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't see why folks think that bunt singles are automatic.  They aren't.  Sac bunts aren't automatic and half the time the opposing team is trying to help facilitate them.

No but excluding fouls, I think sac bunts are successful more often than not.  And we are talking about bunting down the 3B line when there is no infelder on that side of second base.  Ignoring the ones that go foul, the only possible negative outcomes are popouts and balls that the pitcher or catcher is able to field and get the out.  I think it would take a ton of skill to hit .400 or .500 in those circumstances (note the post above that Bryce Harper is 5 for 6).

Certainly he should be able to achieve a higher OBP on bunts than he does now.  And that might cause teams to lessen or abandon the shift.

Seems worth trying but he is on record as not wanting to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe it's Bryce Harper's game?

Also Davis is wicked slow, I don't see him legging out many bunt singles.

If the closest infielder has shifted off to Nebraska somewhere, all he's really got to do is get it by the pitcher and keep it fair.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Bryce Harper just came to the plate with a man on first.  He was 0 for the season so far.  They were playing an extreme shift on him.

He laid a perfect bunt down the third base line for a hit.  

Realmuto followed with a 3 run HR.

So Chris Davis doesn't want to do that because it's "not his game".

Didn't stop Bryce Harper 

Have you actually watched when Chris Davis tried to bunt? It really didn't go well.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been two games, but I understand the frustration. Trying to bunt, even if unsuccessful, would signal that he is at least trying different. At this point, I don't think there's much he can do to even be a replacement level player. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 116 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Just because a player is worth a certain amount of money according to WAR, doesn't mean teams are going to line up to pay a player that amount. A win is worth what, $8 or $9 million according to WAR? So according to that formula, Nunez is worth somewhere between $4 and $9 million. But most teams don't pay players worth two wins or less anything near their market rate. Sure, there might be an exception or two, or someone might be worth two wins or less who's finishing out an expensive contract that was priced based on them being worth more wins than that. Successful teams (without enormous budgets, and even then they still generally don't do this) pay free agent stars and superstars their market worth by WAR, and try to get the two win and under guys for dirt cheap to fill out the roster. This is what is meant by WAR not being linear. Guys like Renato Nunez aren't going to sign for anywhere from $4-$9 million, because it's not hard to stumble around in your farm system or on waivers and find guys for league minimum who have a good chance to be worth a similar amount. All of MLB just passed on the opportunity to pay Nunez a $2-$3 million salary and control his rights for two more seasons after next for the cost of a waiver claim. I imagine if he signs with a team, it will be for less than that amount. You can talk until you're blue in the face about how the formula dictates he's worth that, but if no one is willing to pay a price because they can get the same thing for less money somewhere else, then it's asinine to insist that they should have paid him $2-$3 million And come on. I don't think the Orioles are unique in their DH situation, and they've got a ton of corner outfielders and first basemen who need bats. We weren't the only team with "room" for him. Would they have kept him if they could have continued to pay him league minimum? Probably. What you're missing is that salary and production are two sides of the same coin. Yes, the Orioles cut Nunez because of money. Because his likely production was replaceable for less than $2-$3 million dollars
    • Nevin is a prospect at 23 years old.  1B is his best position.  He will probably stays on the 40 man roster all year. Shaw is an organizational player at 27.  His best position is Bat thus DH.  He is likely to be DFA'd to get him off the 40 man  roster and to Norfolk.
    • Barry Bonds did ok...    
    • If Ayala can improve his shooting that would be awesome.  Today was a good start.  I think Wiggins needs to improve his handles and slashing game to be the scorer that would need.  His catch and shoot game is pure.   Gonna need Marial to improve his offensive game as well.  We already know he will defend the rim (theoretically).  Needs to work on his conditioning.  Ultimately I think our lack of interior presence will be our demise, unless Smith and Scott really ball their face off. We have that Swiss guy Revas as well, I'm not expecting much from him though.  The lack of backcourt depth also might hurt unless Dockery and Smart grow quickly.  Can Ayala be the primary ball handler and distributor?  Maybe. I don't think this team will fall off as badly as most think.  Like you said, Morsell/Ayala/Wiggins will keep us in most games.  If Scott and Hamilton (who was a top 100 recruit going into BC) can step up then I think we could surprise some people.  I see us sneaking into the tournament as a 7-10 seed.  
    • It’s a supply and demand thing.  Whether someone offers X amount of dollars is irrelevant.  The Os And their structure, could use his bat and his production.   Most teams don’t have that combo of at bats and money they can spend on a player with his skill set.     The Os do...and the idea that other teams chose not to do it is irrelevant to his value to this organization.  The idea that they may be looking into Puig (conjecture) and brought on a LH DH type at REINFORCES the idea that this is salary driven, not producing driven imo.     My only argument with this decision is that this isn’t solely or even largely driven by roster management despite what Elias says.  He is lying for management.
    • Your tone of authority when you are clearly in a fog is admirable.  Anyone who thought his arbitration number was a bargain, as you suggest, could have offered a warm body to secure his services before he hit the open market.  What won't make sense is if any team offers him 2M or more now that he's available to any team that wants him.
    • There are three vaccines, possibly four or five, if you trust the Chinese and Russians. Every factory on the world is going to be producing them. We may delay the start of spring training(only three months away) but I don’t think the season will start late. We may have distanced crowds, though.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...