Jump to content
wildcard

What if this is the next O's contending team?

Recommended Posts

I can’t believe I am asking this but at what point would we consider them a contender? 

In playoff position at the trade deadline? Roughly 30 games left? 

Two weeks from now we might be 4 games under .500 and the dream is over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't know why teams like the Yanks and Dodgers spend hundreds of $millions on free agents when they could just believe in each other. 

Not disagreeing with your point... but I do think you can leverage an us against the world mentality a little easier in a 60 game sprint where 8 teams make the playoffs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I can’t believe I am asking this but at what point would we consider them a contender? 

In playoff position at the trade deadline? Roughly 30 games left? 

Two weeks from now we might be 4 games under .500 and the dream is over. 

Three weeks ago I said I thought the Orioles were a 17-win team.  Now that they're 5-3 in eight games I think they end up at (52*(17/60))+5 = 20 wins.  To make the playoffs they need to win about 30 or so.

I'd say they'd have to be about 20-10 through 30 games before I really think they have a chance.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll say this. The entire topic about being a contender reminds me of the NFL. 

The two sports are impossible to compare, not like there is a MiL team in football but the 16 game season creates teams being in the race deeper into the season. It’s not the great “NFL competitive balance” that is promoted by so many but it’s the limited number of games. 

I mean look at the NBA and NHL and the number of mediocre and lesser teams that hang around playoff contention all year. Have only 5 teams in each conference making the playoffs and even in an 82 game season that dream is gone.

Its amazing when you decrease games and increase playoff teams what happens. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I can’t believe I am asking this but at what point would we consider them a contender? 

In playoff position at the trade deadline? Roughly 30 games left? 

Two weeks from now we might be 4 games under .500 and the dream is over. 

If they lose the Marlins series, it's over right there, so I'm not going to think past that series until that series is over.  At that point, we'll have played 12 games - or one fifth of what's planned to be the regular season.  Too soon.      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Three weeks ago I said I thought the Orioles were a 17-win team.  Now that they're 5-3 in eight games I think they end up at (52*(17/60))+5 = 20 wins.  To make the playoffs they need to win about 30 or so.

I'd say they'd have to be about 20-10 through 30 games before I really think they have a chance.

31-29 probably gets a team to the playoffs.  They don't have to go 20-10 to win 31.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I can’t believe I am asking this but at what point would we consider them a contender? 

It’s not 15% of the way through the season,  I know that much. I don’t think there’s a magic number but I do think that they are playing above their head right now.

I also don’t think Lil Yaz is the best player in baseball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

If they lose the Marlins series, it's over right there, so I'm not going to think past that series until that series is over.  At that point, we'll have played 12 games - or one fifth of what's planned to be the regular season.  Too soon.      

Of course it’s way too soon. Just having a little fun. Like I said in 2 weeks we may be under .500 and headed towards 40 losses. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm working on enjoying the moment but these wins are feeling a little bit Pyrrhic, as the risk of missing a shot at one more rare talent for the next good team's core group increases.

I took a little comfort this weekend in that entering 1989 - with today's perspective I might have looked for a McDonald bookend, then we went and did all that winning and only got...Mike Mussina (but not Chipper Jones).

It isn't that I want the team to lose, it is more that this team very likely ought to lose.  In 162, they would surely earn X for the peak Rutschman teams, but the circumstances of 2020 might conspire to block the org from having what it "deserves".

But hey, if we can sweep the Rays, the Pirates can sweep the Twins, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

It’s not 15% of the way through the season,  I know that much. I don’t think there’s a magic number but I do think that they are playing above their head right now.

I also don’t think Lil Yaz is the best player in baseball.

I feel like I have lost my mind even bringing it up as a conversation/kidding around.

Imagine a 162 game season with 5 playoffs teams like normal. Would be 154 games left. Even as a joke nobody would bring it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's still way too soon to be talking like this but it's still fun.

Maybe it's a perfect storm for a team like the Orioles to get into an expanded playoff format and make some noise.  And with the way the schedule is set up, it seems like it could be possible.  The Marlins were bad to begin with, now they're having a hard time to field a team.  We should be able to beat up on them, but so will everyone else.  Boston doesn't look good, despite having some good offensive weapons.  

So...In the words of Lou Brown, maybe we can "hang around for a while and see if we can give 'em all a nice big $#*%burger to eat!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, wildcard said:

31-29 probably gets a team to the playoffs.  They don't have to go 20-10 to win 31.

This is not a contending team...Don't be fooled by a good start. The only problem is they may be able to hang around with the real Cobb and veteran performances by Milone, and LeBlanc might prevent them from being terrible

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hopeful that this is a short enough sprint into a really wide playoff net that the marathon of a normal baseball season won't be able to pick out the flukes quickly enough. After that point, you just need to be hot at the right time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just reviewed the 2005 oriole season. After 72 games they were 42-30. After that, they started faltering and they only won 32 more games the whole season.

However, that illustrates that if a team starts hot, and every player is able to play to his maximum ability for a time, it is possible. After all, the best team ever playing the worst team ever only wins one game at a time, and all that extra talent and ability is wasted. We don’t have to be the best,We just have to cover our flaws for 60 games.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

31-29 probably gets a team to the playoffs.  They don't have to go 20-10 to win 31.

It would certainly help.  Unless you think that roughly one month's worth of results is overwhelmingly more meaningful than all of our body knowledge about the Orioles and the rest of the league.

The 2019 Orioles had a 12-12 July and a stretch where they went 7-3 in 10 games.  They went 18-37 in August and September.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I think generally people tend to overestimate the number of players that a good farm system typically produces over a given period of time.   Let’s define a 50 as a guy who produces 10 WAR in the 6+ years he’s under team control.    In 2013, 200+ players debuted, but only 33 met that standard.    So basically, an average of one per team per year.   
    • As a kid of the 1970's, my hatred of the Yankees is well ingrained by now.  I happily vote WS where the Skanks lost pretty high.  Not higher than those our Orioles won, perhaps, but no Yankee win would occur before either of those two criteria are met.  And then there is every other team in the league to consider ahead of any NY win.  I don't think a Yankee win would even occur in my list... Sadly, it looks like Scott Van Pelt only had one measly vote.
    • It was 2nd division starter or utility guy, right? And with a 50 ceiling. That's a ML player who, best case, is a good starter on a good team or likely is still a guy with some value to a ML team. Especially if he can hold his own in the outfield. My take here is that: 1) Tony's understandably being conservative in general on this list because he hasn't seen a lot of these guys for a full year. 2) He's going by what he's heard. 3) There are guys lower on this list that are a bit farther away but who have higher potential. 4) Vavra, based on Tony and rankings from other sites with some credibility, has some potential to be a real contributor to the ML team within 2 years. I actually think Tony's grade is pretty accurate based on the feedback, but whether he should be ranked over Baumler, Mayo, Rom, Smith, Hall, Wells, Bradish, Stowers, Hernaiz, Haskin and others is up for debate and, ultimately, not really important. Heck, at least one site has him at 7. They must think he's decent. All those guys have risk and they all have had a big layoff from baseball, or at least from being seen. Vavra got put here because he's closer, he has produced on the field, and thus has somewhat lower risk, is my guess.
    • I think there’s very little journalism in sports, although there can be some very good sports writing. I think the very title indicates that this is just off-season fluff.
    • Yes, that place is good. But it used to be a barbecue place (maybe 20 or 25 years ago).   It was really good then.   I think it was called the Blind Pig. When I go to Tech for football games (about 6 weekends every fall since 1992, until this year), I cut across from 340 to 81 on Rt 7 and I stopped at the Blind Pig many a time, and got a pulled pork sandwich. Then The Blind Pig went out of business and was a tobacco store or something. Now it's tacos and I've stopped there once I think.
    • Don’t you remember, in 2012, Nate Mclouth hit a ball that grazed the foul pole for a Home run, but it was called foul. it would have changed the game, though it might not have changed the outcome. 
    • Folks tend to be overly generous with player comps.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...