Jump to content
wildcard

What if this is the next O's contending team?

Recommended Posts

playing much, much better baseball than I expected.  Playoffs are definitely within the achievable although question if ME will trade off any players

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, wildcard said:

33% through the season. Two weeks ago the consensus was that the 2020 O's were not a contending team.  Not enough talent to contend.  Read what you posted.    Has your opinion changed?

 

On 8/2/2020 at 11:16 AM, Frobby said:

This is not our next contending team.   Could it fluke into a .500ish season and have a shot at making a 16-team playoff?    I wouldn’t rule that out completely, and I’d enjoy it, but I don’t think that makes them a contending team by my definition.    

My opinion has not changed.     But our odds of having a shot at the 16-game playoffs have improved.     You know the old saying about baseball “it’s a marathon, not a sprint?”     Well, this is a sprint, and we’re in good position 33 meters into the 100 meter dash.   I’m having a lot of fun watching it happen.    

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2005 team was 36-24 after 60 games.

We are on exactly the same pace.

the 2005 team fell completely apart after that point, but after 60 games they still had 102 remaining. We will not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Philip said:

The 2005 team was 36-24 after 60 games.

We are on exactly the same pace.

the 2005 team fell completely apart after that point, but after 60 games they still had 102 remaining. We will not.

The 2005 team was long in the tooth, for the lineup at least. Raffy and Surhoff were both 40.  Mora and Tejada were > 30, a 36 year old Sosa and 34 year old Javy Lopez.   Way more talent on paper, but it also had some low-character guys, juicers and bums like Ponson.  So its no surprise they fell apart.

Edited by GuidoSarducci

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GuidoSarducci said:

The 2005 team was long in the tooth, for the lineup at least. Raffy and Surhoff were both 40.  Mora and Tejada were > 30, a 36 year old Sosa and 34 year old Javy Lopez.   Way more talent on paper, but it also had some low-character guys, juicers and bums like Ponson.  So its no surprise they fell apart.

Yeah, over a long season, generally talent and luck will level out so you end up pretty much the way you should be. That would probably be the case with us as well, the guys we have who seem to have made genuine improvements aren’t significant enough to have a “terrible to terrific” effect.

I think in a full season we would be respectable but still not very good, but in the short season, flaws will be minimized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Philip said:

Yeah, over a long season, generally talent and luck will level out so you end up pretty much the way you should be. That would probably be the case with us as well, the guys we have who seem to have made genuine improvements aren’t significant enough to have a “terrible to terrific” effect.

I think in a full season we would be respectable but still not very good, but in the short season, flaws will be minimized.

Or exaggerated.  The 2010 Orioles were a generically bad 66-96 (.407).  But they started 1-11 and were under .300 at the 60-game mark.  Everyone knows about the '88 team, that started 0-21, and were 15-45, 40-win pace, 60 games in.

One reason the '82 Orioles had to sprint in September to try to catch the Brewers is that they started 2-10 and didn't stay over .500 until early June.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

o

 

Reeling, but still alive ........ save for Alex Cobb's start on Monday, the starting rotation has been putting a lot of pressure on both the bullpen and the offense as of late.

 

(AUGUST 18th)

 

The Orioles' starting rotation has a 7.53 ERA over its last 7 games, and said pitchers have covered just 28.67 innings in that stretch.

They have 4 starts of 4 innings or less over the past 7 outings.

 

SOURCE: ) Steve Melewski

 

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/08/caleb-joseph-on-return-to-baltimore-plus-other-notes.html

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/2/2020 at 8:32 AM, wildcard said:

 

Yeah, yeah, yeah ...... SSS, too early and all that.

The Orioles took 2 out of 3 from the Red Sox. They should have split with the Yankees if the ump was better. And now, they will have won at least 2 of 3 from Tampa Bay. Maybe we can't call this team a contender yet, but it does deserve the chance to be a contender. 3 of the starters look like they will be good. There are a group of relievers that look good. The offense is scoring at least 5 most games. The defense looks much tighter.

However, Elias made it clear in his most recent video explaining the Bleier trade that his focus is on the future, and not the present team. I think that trading Bleier was a logical move sometime this season. But trading him a week into the season when the team is still contending was a radical move. The timing was radical.   

Normally a GM sees what his team is doing verse its competition, and either adds or subtracts about half through the seasonHe (usually) gives the team a chance to show what it can do. Then he makes moves accordingly. Elias did not do that. He didn't wait three weeks to see how his team was doing. We saw the results last night. Bleier has been a good setup pitcher in the 8th inning over his Orioles career. Last night, the Rays tied the game by scoring 3 runs in the 8th. That is just the first example of missing Bleier.

There is no way to know if this team is the next contending team. I hope that Elias gives them a chance.

Here is Elias' presser, about the trade of Bleier:

 

https://www.masnsports.com/videos/2020/08/mike-elias-on-the-orioles-recent-roster-moves.html

 

 

o

 

(37 DAYS LATER)

 

"The Orioles' record isnt supposed to matter in 2020, but thats like being told that average is a useless stat until a player has a chance to win the batting title."

 

Roch Kubatko

 

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/09/what-else-is-going-on-with-orioles-besides-pennant-race.html

 

o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a much different team than the one from even a few weeks ago.

Not sure they still make it but they obviously have a chance with NY faltering so much and being so injured.  The other teams aren’t any better than the Os. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

This is a much different team than the one from even a few weeks ago.

Not sure they still make it but they obviously have a chance with NY faltering so much and being so injured.  The other teams aren’t any better than the Os. 

I think it is safe to say that not all of the playoff teams in 2020 would be considered good by traditional metrics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it is safe to say that not all of the playoff teams in 2020 would be considered good by traditional metrics.

Of course not but that doesn’t really matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LET'S GO!

This is getting exciting.  Means would be a great piece of the puzzle to have back in place.  Mountcastle has provided a big jolt.  Stewart is coming on.  Mullins looks better.  Not sure how many long term answers we really have on this team, but who cares?  We are competing every night.    

I've seen some metrics on Kremer's start with not a good strike % and only 8 swinging strikes.  The velo was impressive.  If he can tick up the strike % a bit and lower the BBs, he may just be a major league starting pitcher.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really might be time to start considering calling up Baumann and Yusniel Diaz.  Or Lowther and Zimmerman.  Start having some length in the pen and piece together 9IP. And of course, DFA Davis.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 140 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Clearly I am failing to get my point across. I'm tired. Have any opinion you want. At the end of the day, you have an opinion, I have facts. My facts state that Elias has dumped one player that became an impact player and he has not acquired any. Does that mean he will never acquire any? No.  Does it mean he missed something of that the technology may not always have the answers, incomplete. I like a lot of what Elias has done in changing things within the organization, but so far his talent evaluations of players he's brought in have not been very good. Grant it, these guys are waiver claims and few of them will turn into anything, but so far he's found middle/long relievers and utility guys or sub par guys they've run out as starters the last two years. I expect things to improve, but what we don't know yet is whether he will be given a budget to help improve the team in the future. Afterall, if they are really making coaching moves based on salary (I still don't believe this) then you can throw away any chances of the team being competitive soon so he will need to build completely from within. My hope was that Elias had the technological and scouting eye to find unearthed talent in other organizations. Instead, he failed to pick up Yaz's potential and the guys he has selected have not shown they are part of a winning future.  Sure, maybe we can give him a pass on Yaz, but he also hired the coaches yet the SF coaches in less then a few weeks found a way to make Yaz an impact player. The man at the top gets credit when things go well, but also must take the blame when they don't.  
    • I know Elias wants to know if he missed something in his evaluation, sure. Why wouldn't he. But I doubt he is losing sleep over this. Yaz was traded on March 23, 2019. At that time, he was a 28 year old OF with average speed, maybe an average arm, below average power for a corner OF that does not play CF. He's 5-10 178 lbs. and was no longer a prospect. He was slowed by injuries, often playing dinged up. Dan Duquette alluded to his injuries in an interview that I saw and stated he had struggled with his progression. He had never really excelled in AAA. He was behind Austin Hays, Yusniel Diaz, Anthony Santander, Ryan McKenna, Cedric Mullins and DJ Stewart for playing time in AA/AAA OF playing time. No one knew that several of these players would struggle with injuries and inconsistency, but they were all much more highly regarded prospects than Yaz. At that time, the only AAA OF he was more highly regarded than was Jaycob Brugman, and he was absolutely terrible. Elias decided to cut bait so that actual prospects could play meaningful innings and get the developmental at bats. No other team even thought so much of him as to take him in the rule 5 draft. Did the Giants know something? No, they just got lucky that this one panned out. They had no idea he would do what he has done, no way.  As far as the technology, it isn't something that will diagnose and fix every swing. It gives you lots of data, and it takes time, more than a few weeks, to work through any changes/adjustments needed. Obviously, Elias and his staff were not impressed with what they saw compared to the other guys. Then, Yaz was traded and something changed over the next few months in AAA for him. Great for him. Maybe he started to make good changes from what he learned from the Elias staff, but it took time to begin to show in games. That is often the case with swing changes, approach adjustments. Maybe it was the Giants who found something. Maybe it was something else, who knows.  Was he going to be the same player in Baltimore, facing the AL East? IDK, I would guess likely not. There have been many examples over they years of players who had impact careers out West and got traded to an Eastern team, only to struggle. Would it have been nice to see him do that here in Baltimore, of course. I just don't see why this has become such a hotly contested thing. Hindsight is easy to see clearly. His tools have never indicated this kind of production. There is not one prospect report that says he would do anything like he is doing.  I know you are pretty positive about Elias and Sig. To point to Elias's failure to produce waiver wire pick ups and minor trades into an impact player is incomplete, honestly, in COVID 2020 crazy season. He has no money to spend, and yet most of the ML team was picked up off waivers and minor league free agency and still competed on most nights. The final record looks worse than it was. I would say his record was excellent in the first half. Santander got hurt and many young players struggled badly. Solid approaches went out the window entirely.  Pedro Severino had an OPS north of .850 in July/August and he began to look like an all star (offensively), but he chased much more in September and his numbers faded badly to .250/.322/.388/.710 Jose Iglesias was an impact signing, despite the injuries and many at bats in the DH role .373/.400/.556/.956 Hanser Alberto is what he is a well below-average defender with little power, and he faded badly in September as well .283/.306/.393/.698 Pat Valaika was very good, I thought, for what his role is. .277/.315/.475/.791 Rio Ruiz is probably not the answer at 3B, but I think he gets one more year to see if he can figure it out .222/.286/.427/.713 Richie Martin will be vastly improved, he reported so much stronger than in 2019 and I think his injury robbed him of a breakout of sorts, the swing looked so much more fluid and quick in Spring camp. Ramon Urias might just make Alberto expendable, and I believe he will hit and produce better overall numbers and play better defense. Obviously, Dwight Smith Jr. was a failure. Early in 2019, he certainly looked like he was a certain upgrade to Yaz. The the injuries in late May, neck and shoulder. He has not been the same since. Most of the resources have gone into minor league and international infrastructure. To criticize Elias for the Yaz trade in hindsight, honestly it's silly. No one batted an eye at the time of the deal. Can we just be happy for the guy and not look for someone to blame? If there is a pattern here, then ok, there's a problem. This one baffles everyone because no one saw this coming. And where would Yaz play in our OF next season? Over Mountcastle, Santander, Hays, Mullins, Mancini...? 
    • Who are the #23 and #24 Prospects?
    • https://www.orioleshangout.com/2020/10/25/20-2020-prospect-kyle-bradish-rhp/
    • Back to the Snell/Fairbanks/Anderson/Castillo even numbered game quartet to try and set up Buehler (and Kershaw?) v. The World Wednesday night. The Dodgers have clearly dented the relief aces, but I don't look for any process change in Game 6. This feels like it should be over 4-1 but for the gods putting their thumbs on the scale last night - an excellent bonus baseball gift.
    • You a few others really are missing my point. I'm done trying to make it. Read what I wrote in other posts.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...