Jump to content
Frobby

The extra inning runner on 2B rule

Do you like the extra inning runner on 2B rule?  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the extra inning runner on 2B rule?



Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Hallas said:

what, you're saying they didn't have multicolored compression shirts in 1870????

Tangent... sometime in the 1880s the NL tried a scheme where players at different positions wore different brightly colored/striped/etc uniforms.  It didn't last long before they realized that the guy standing near second base was probably the second baseman no matter what shirt he was wearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Another approach that I would prefer would be to declare a tie after (insert inning you feel appropriate) and have a points system for the pennant. That keeps all the data collection more consistent. A 13th inning in 1986 was played under the same rules (If not the same pharmacology) as a 13th inning in 2026. I think it is also more honest. We just don’t want the game to go on any longer, and we are fed up watching the dudes in this current game: tie!!

I don't mind that at all.  But we have had a nice conversation about the new strategies that have/will arise from this new situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't mind that at all.  But we have had a nice conversation about the new strategies that have/will arise from this new situation.

The more I think about it, maybe putting a guy on second is the best all around solution? Seems like there are three potential goals: 1) get the game to end soon; 2) increase the excitement level of extra innings; 3) force some new approaches or strategies in extra innings.

A tie obviously  sits in one corner of that space. A guy on second helps things to come to a conclusion and it adds some immediate pressure to each inning, although the strategy shifts seem marginal at the moment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/3/2020 at 11:09 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

This looks exactly like baseball. If you went to the bathroom at the start of the 10th inning you wouldn't even know the rule changed.

How'd the runner get on second? What did he do to get on base? Why is he out there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LocoChris said:

How'd the runner get on second? What did he do to get on base? Why is he out there?

If I was watching the game with a staunch traditionalist I'd just tell them that he lined the ball off the top of the CF wall, he fell down rounding first, the CFer dropped it, then threw it to the wrong guy, there was a three minute rundown he escaped from... man, you picked a wrong moment to go to the head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If I was watching the game with a staunch traditionalist I'd just tell them that he lined the ball off the top of the CF wall, he fell down rounding first, the CFer dropped it, then threw it to the wrong guy, there was a three minute rundown he escaped from... man, you picked a wrong moment to go to the head.

Another to keep on your pocket could be:
All of the infielders were on on side of the field and he hit a dribbler just over the base into the outfield.  By the time the fielders got to the ball he just squeaked in to second by running hard out of the box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If people have to change the rules to enjoy something that for hundreds of years has been more than enough for generations of people worldwide, then I suggest to those people to get a more exciting sport to follow.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Oriole1940 said:

If people have to change the rules to enjoy something that for hundreds of years has been more than enough for generations of people worldwide, then I suggest to those people to get a more exciting sport to follow.  

 

You’re right, god forbid that a sport change a single rule in 150 years!  Shall we roll back the DH?

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LocoChris said:

I still hate it. Makes it feel like a kick ball game in a high school gym class. 

I think it’s here to stay and that comparison is loco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Oriole1940 said:

If people have to change the rules to enjoy something that for hundreds of years has been more than enough for generations of people worldwide, then I suggest to those people to get a more exciting sport to follow.  

 

Isn't that exactly the problem?  When baseball had essentially no competition it was the most popular team sport.  As football, basketball, hockey, soccer have gotten more exposure and have become legitimate alternatives more and more people choose the sports where the game is either over in two hours, is full of more action or they only play once a week. Baseball attendance has been in decline for a decade, and ratings have always been very localized.  Nobody in Atlanta watches a Mariners-Twins game, not like Falcons fans would watch a Seahawks-Vikings game.

So many, many people have taken your advice and moved on to something else that doesn't take four hours, with 90 minutes of pitching changes and figuring out the signs and adjusting your batting glove.  And there's always the possibility the game will go 14 innings and last six and half hours. 

You might be happy with that, but owners and players who want expanded revenues and fans who'd like a nice 2-hour baseball game probably aren't.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, fansince71 said:

I think it’s here to stay and that comparison is loco.

When basketball added the shot clock the first thing I thought of was how it was now the same as bouncing balls on a parachute in 3rd grade P.E.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still like it, too.  It makes teams play small-ball.  And if you're the home team and the visiting team scores in the top half, you still feel like you've got a shot, even if you have the bottom third of the lineup coming up.

 

18 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

When basketball added the shot clock the first thing I thought of was how it was now the same as bouncing balls on a parachute in 3rd grade P.E.

The big rainbow colored parachute?!!?!??!?!?!? And then after you'd bounce the balls on it, you'd all stand around in a circle and throw it up really high and then run under it and set on the edge so it'd be a big bubble that'd slowly deflate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I agree..just saying, who the hell knows.  
    • The .377 was a fluke.  But he did also hit .344 in the AFL that Fall, too.   Do I think he’s a potential .300+ hitter as a major leaguer?   Not at all.    But a guy who can play a solid major league CF doesn’t have to hit a ton to be a useful player.    His career MiL line of .264/.350/.387 would do the trick just fine if he could pull that off in the majors.    
    • I don’t think so.    I have a college degree and a law degree.    My wife has a college degree and two masters’ degrees.   All three of my kids have college degrees, from pricey private colleges that we paid for in full.   One of them has a graduate degree as well.    I totally understand the value of a good education (which is different than “intelligence”). But Kjerstad is a guy who chose to enter the draft before he’d finished college and take a pile of money to play professional athletics.    In my mind (and probably by contract), he’s obligated to give his employer priority over completing his degree, which plenty of players do without declining their professional obligations.    Now understand, I don’t think Kjerstad did this.   I believe he was unable to participate for medical reasons and decided to use the time to continue his education, which is great.    But I wouldn’t agree with it if he had simply chosen to blow off Fall Instructs to take classes.      
    • So now the goalpost is if makes an impact on his major league career the next season?  That's quite a jump.  I will say that one year of age when a player is making his MLB debut can hugely impact his future earnings. No one in this thread is suggesting that he shouldn't finish his degree at some point.  Also intelligence and education aren't the same thing.    Of course odds are very good that the speculation of him not being able to attend the camp and instead using his time to work on his degree is correct.
    • Yes, a player COULD benefit from the instruction league, even though its a fact that no one has ever benefited enough to be a starter on the major league level the following year, AND he COULD also be in an auto accident and not be able to play any sports. How much is the Instruction League going to help him then.  The topic of this thread is about the player, but the real discussion is about each Poster's value system . . . intelligence or athletics!
    • You must have seen a different guy than I saw.  He committed 4 errors in 9 games.  3 of those at SS.  From his minor league history I think he might have a chance at 2B but not SS.
    • I would say that's crazy, but after this year, I'd say nothing is out of the question.  The only thing they have going for them is they have a successful major league season under their belt with no deaths and limited interruptions (not surprisingly). Even if they don't want to have a season at all the stadiums and all the travel, they should be able to have a Florida and Arizona camp leagues like they should of had this year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...