Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
brvn52

Could Elias Keep Mountcastle Down All Year?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Friedman left without a ring.

I could see Elias leaving for a larger market when his contract is up if offers are out there.

Higher profile gig, more money, larger budget.  Why wouldn't he consider it?

First of all, the other team would have to get permission from the Orioles to even interview him.   It's something that typically doesn't happen.   You raid the front office for it's #2 and #3 guys and give them head jobs.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SteveA said:

First of all, the other team would have to get permission from the Orioles to even interview him.   It's something that typically doesn't happen.   You raid the front office for it's #2 and #3 guys and give them head jobs.

Did you see the part where I said when his contract is up?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Did you see the part where I said when his contract is up?

 

Actually I didn't.   Do we know when that is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Actually I didn't.   Do we know when that is?

I don't think it was ever officially said but I heard five years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think it was ever officially said but I heard five years. 

Even if moves wouldn’t necessarily materialize into MLB benefits by that time (e.g., improving the LatAm pipeline), that’s part of his resume for that potential next opportunity. It benefits to think beyond his theoretical tenure to a large degree. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Lucky_13 said:

I think it's more likely Elias is seeing whether MLB can get the covid situation under control. 

No reason to call up Mountcastle and burn a year of service time for a season that gets cancelled. 

Eh.  Next season it'll be another excuse.

Maybe Mountcastle's just not that good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Eh.  Next season it'll be another excuse.

Maybe Mountcastle's just not that good.

Have you noticed that Nunez is playing first opening up DH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Eh.  Next season it'll be another excuse.

Maybe Mountcastle's just not that good.

What's not being good have to do with playing for the Orioles?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I think Mountcastle's service time issues are behind him.  The first 7 games, Sure.  But I don't see them keeping him down all of the 202 season.

In fact, I could see him called up for the doubleheader this week.  I asked the question "How long can Stewart keep Mountcastle down."   I think the answer is  "Its time."    Stewart can be optioned.

I’ve seen enough Stewart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I heard he has not been impressive with the bat in the "intrasquad games" so not sure if that has anything to do with it as well. 

Personally, I'd like to see him come up.

It's extremely unlikey that Elias is making this decision based on a couple of weeks of intrasquad games. Of all the possible reasons he isn't up, this isn't it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LTO's said:

It's extremely unlikey that Elias is making this decision based on a couple of weeks of intrasquad games. Of all the possible reasons he isn't up, this isn't it.

I tend to agree with you. I've heard some others things too but rather not spread them them without conformation.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose a lot of high draft picks miss and Mountcastle, Stewart, Sisco, Sedlock, Grenier weren’t single digits or anything. And they have no ties to current management so I can’t think why Mike would be reluctant to get rid of them if he didn’t think they had a future.

however, if Mike really wants 1-1 next year, it looks like he’s going to have to work for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mountcastle not being up has very little if anything to do with service time.  They just don't think he's all that great and before they give him a chance they want to see what happens with Stewart, Nunez, Rios, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Yaz played the instrument for years and wasn’t good.  He deserved nothing and didn’t earn anything.
    • Yeah, I don't consider returning a Rule 5 guy to be a fail.  In fact, it is the most likely result, league-wide.  I really consider taking Rule 5 shots at guys to be a matter of nothing ventured, nothing gained.  Also, IMO, picking up stop gap players and have them turn out to be exactly that isn't really a fail, either.  Sure, I'd like to see us strike gold on one of these guys, but I can't say that I expect it to happen.  I'm more interested in seeing how guys we acquire like Vavra and Smith turn out.
    • So? The guys we brought up for a chance, every guy brought up for a chance, as opposed to bringing up “because he is ready,” is by definition being given an opportunity that he doesn’t necessarily deserve. We risk nothing by bringing him up. I’m a musician, and I can’t judge a piece without paying it once. Maybe not all the way through, but gotta sit down and play it. Now, it might be by a terrible or unknown composer, and some would say,”it’s by Danzi, it sucks.” Well, so? Maybe it does suck. Danzi was a mediocre composer. But maybe it doesn’t suck. Maybe it’s worthwhile, as recital filler, or as a rare gem from a mediocrity. But if I play it, I’ll know. As another surprisingly similar example, the widow of a local cellist gave me some of her late husband’s music, including an untouched piece he bought 50+ years ago. So rare there’s only one lonely YouTube audio, and the music is long out of print and the publisher is itself long out of business. I played it and said, “this is an incredible piece.” And it is. So this piece is Yaz. The previous owner never bothered to play it, and I did, and I get the benefit. If he’d played lit, maybe he’d have hated it, maybe not. But he never gave it a chance.
    • Well let’s remember that a lot of parts of that system that are good were here before Elias got here.
    • Interesting analysis. Not sure I agree on all points but from my perspective I look at the Elias-Sig regime as a definite 5 year project and as I have stated before I don't start grading until after 2021 and possibly 2022 as one full season and 60 games is no legitimate yardstick. Not having minor league baseball is a definite setback but the fact our Farm System is graded #8 is big plus and the FO deserves some credit here. In summary, rebuilding a 47 win team is going to be a major task and it's going to take several years to turn the corner. I think we all need patience and lots of it realistically.
    • I think it’s pretty easy to identify talent and where guys are blocked. Its not simple to acquire it but it certainly and can and should be done.
    • I mean I guess but guys are on waivers for a reason..they aren’t good.  You take a shot and see if you can catch lightning in a bottle but for the most part, all you hope for is someone to take up at bats while you wait for younger players to develop. I would never really expect a guy to be claimed off of waivers and turn out to be good.  I wouldn’t expect a rule 5 guy to be anything more than a mediocre role player. Sometimes you get lucky and they become more than that but usually, they are as likely to be DFa’ed as they are to make a minimal contribution. I think complaining about the lack of productivity from these types of guys is a relative waste of time.  Where I think you do complain is that Elias hasn’t gotten better players.  That’s my complaint.  You have some resources to get better players, go get them.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...