Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Elias: emulating the Rays?

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Philip said:

If Mike is really going to avoid drafting pitchers, that’s a problem. 
I don’t know whether the Astros count as mid-market or not, but they definitely have more money than the Orioles, and spending a pile of money on almost any FA pitching would be foolish, when you can draft a bunch of guys, keep them for 3-4 inexpensive years and then trade them.

the Rays are right. “Trade early and often”

Look at Houston’s top pitchers last year. Verlander, Cole, and Greinke were acquired by trade, Miley a FA who made less than 5M (far less than he made with us the previous few years btw).

You don’t need to pay FA prices for pitchers if you can trade for them. You just have to trust that your GM is better than the other guy. When you give away a pitcher you want the Bedard deal, when you get a pitcher you want the Verlander deal. The point is you draft and develop a ton of talent and you can use it as needed. 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ORIOLE33 said:

I know i’m bearing a dead horse and It probably will never happen because the union won’t allow it, but baseball really need some kind of system (not necessarily a salary cap) where small market teams can hold players that they develop. Nothing is more frustrating than being a glorified farm system for big market teams. 

That's why it's really important that they like up the core guys early, like within their first season if possible. It's risky but thats the only way middle market teams and lower keep their guys

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, makoman said:

Look at Houston’s top pitchers last year. Verlander, Cole, and Greinke were acquired by trade, Miley a FA who made less than 5M (far less than he made with us the previous few years btw).

You don’t need to pay FA prices for pitchers if you can trade for them. You just have to trust that your GM is better than the other guy. When you give away a pitcher you want the Bedard deal, when you get a pitcher you want the Verlander deal. The point is you draft and develop a ton of talent and you can use it as needed. 

Yep, it’s not like “grow the arms and buy the bats“ was a proven system. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, makoman said:

Look at Houston’s top pitchers last year. Verlander, Cole, and Greinke were acquired by trade, Miley a FA who made less than 5M (far less than he made with us the previous few years btw).

You don’t need to pay FA prices for pitchers if you can trade for them. You just have to trust that your GM is better than the other guy. When you give away a pitcher you want the Bedard deal, when you get a pitcher you want the Verlander deal. The point is you draft and develop a ton of talent and you can use it as needed. 

Those three pitchers had already signed historically huge contracts. I don’t think those examples refute what I said. We could not afford even one of those contracts, much less all three of them, plus each of them was expensive in terms of prospects.

The biggest pitching contract we gave out( I think) was Jimenez And Cobb. Whether they were wise decisions I leave up to you, but that money was Just a fraction of the contracts that those guys signed.

Trades are not necessarily bad, but the best thing to do is to draft a whole lot of guys. They will be free while they are in the minors, And if they don’t pan out you release them, and if they do, you’ve got up to six years before you lose them. Trade them in year four, Restock the farm start over again.

Instead Of getting a guy who’s already into a historically large contract, paying huge prospect price for him, running the risk that age will rear its ugly head, and doing all that while realizing that at the end of his contract he’s going to be too old to trade, and you’re not going to want to re-sign him again anyway.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very difficult to imitate the Rays (and the As) because those two franchises move good players pre-free agent because they (mostly) have to.  To a lesser extent, these teams do the Bedard trade over and over and make that trade with popular players.  One can say, as I probably have, that we should have a hybrid model where we imitate the Rays, but also keep and sign a few more players to LTCs than the Rays would.  That would be great in theory, but over time it seems the Rays success has been related to a single-minded focus to deal players a year too early than a year too late.   

This board has shown little stomach to deal our star players pre-FA over the last 10 years.  There are many examples of guys we should have traded around the beginning of their arbitration years when their trade value was highest, but our FO kept the players too long from Johnson (reliever), Wieters, Machado, Mora, Hardy, Davis and others.  Some of these guys we signed to LTCs instead of dealing at the right moment.  The Rays would have dealt each of these guys instead of waiting as long as the Os FO did.

Before we start worrying about that, however, we need to build the scouting and development infrastructure of the Rays.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, makoman said:

Look at Houston’s top pitchers last year. Verlander, Cole, and Greinke were acquired by trade, Miley a FA who made less than 5M (far less than he made with us the previous few years btw).

You don’t need to pay FA prices for pitchers if you can trade for them. You just have to trust that your GM is better than the other guy. When you give away a pitcher you want the Bedard deal, when you get a pitcher you want the Verlander deal. The point is you draft and develop a ton of talent and you can use it as needed. 


So far I’ve seen nothing to indicate the Elias is good at trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You always want to trade a player a year early as opposed to a year too late.

I don’t care if you are big, medium or small market..that’s just smart baseball.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You always want to trade a player a year early as opposed to a year too late.

I don’t care if you are big, medium or small market..that’s just smart baseball.

Always is such a loaded term.

If you are an honest to goodness contender I can see holding onto someone like Britton since they can be such a weapon in the playoffs.  If the timing is right you have to play for today and not three years down the line.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Always is such a loaded term.

If you are an honest to goodness contender I can see holding onto someone like Britton since they can be such a weapon in the playoffs.  If the timing is right you have to play for today and not three years down the line.

True...stand by what I said but agree that can’t say always because there are legit contenders that can win.  However, that does assume the trade happens during the season.  In the offseason, I believe what I said is true.  I don’t care how good the team is.

The Os after 2016 is a perfect example of a team that absolutely should have seen the writing on the wall and dealt their stars but they didn’t need to deal them during the season

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Always is such a loaded term.

If you are an honest to goodness contender I can see holding onto someone like Britton since they can be such a weapon in the playoffs.  If the timing is right you have to play for today and not three years down the line.

Case in point, last year’s WS champion.  Most were saying they should have traded off Rendon, Scherzer, and others before the deadline.  That team has let their soon to be FAs play to the end of their contracts (Rendon, Zimmermann, Desmond, Harper, etc) and have been very successful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The could call it the Reserve Clause.

It’s never happening. What might happen is that players are free sooner. But this next CBA gonna be might tough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Philip said:

Those three pitchers had already signed historically huge contracts. I don’t think those examples refute what I said. We could not afford even one of those contracts, much less all three of them, plus each of them was expensive in terms of prospects.

The biggest pitching contract we gave out( I think) was Jimenez And Cobb. Whether they were wise decisions I leave up to you, but that money was Just a fraction of the contracts that those guys signed.

Trades are not necessarily bad, but the best thing to do is to draft a whole lot of guys. They will be free while they are in the minors, And if they don’t pan out you release them, and if they do, you’ve got up to six years before you lose them. Trade them in year four, Restock the farm start over again.

Instead Of getting a guy who’s already into a historically large contract, paying huge prospect price for him, running the risk that age will rear its ugly head, and doing all that while realizing that at the end of his contract he’s going to be too old to trade, and you’re not going to want to re-sign him again anyway.

 

Houston is a gargantuan sized market. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, weams said:

It’s never happening. What might happen is that players are free sooner. But this next CBA gonna be might tough. 

I think that in most cases small market teams could hold onto their star players if they wanted to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, weams said:

Houston is a gargantuan sized market. 

Well that just reinforces that Houston does that which we can not do, and therefore is a poor example to follow.

Don’t trade draft picks, do get active in the international market, draft big, sign kids, and trade in year four.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Roll Tide said:


So far I’ve seen nothing to indicate the Elias is good at trading.

He hasn’t made that many trades, but remember, his goal is to make the future team better. His goal might very well be to deliberately make the current team worse because the third draft pick is more valuable than the 15th, so if he can trade a good reliever now for a guy who might be good in 5 years, he will do it.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Back to the Snell/Fairbanks/Anderson/Castillo even numbered game quartet to try and set up Buehler (and Kershaw?) v. The World Wednesday night. The Dodgers have clearly dented the relief aces, but I don't look for any process change in Game 6. This feels like it should be over 4-1 but for the gods putting their thumbs on the scale last night - an excellent bonus baseball gift.
    • You a few others really are missing my point. I'm done trying to make it. Read what I wrote in other posts.
    • Very good game tonight. Both pens were real good. 
    • That fact that he pointed out Anthony Sanders and his race as being the one screwed also made me question it.
    • I'm surprised by this comment, Tony.  I'm not sure how you can blame Elias for Yaz coming out of nowhere to perform as he has for the Giants.  You really think there was reason to expect that Elias should have seen that coming?  Wow.
    • I’m guessing that a claim was probably filed against Elias and the Orioles for pension fraud (possibly by the agent of a coach on the staff that didn’t get the pension benefits), but since MLB approved Holt before the season as one of the 4 coaches designated to receive pension benefits, that’s why this is a non-story.  The quote from the MLB spokesperson said Holt received prior approval from the league and shared it with the MLBPA, so the only possible explanation is that the MLBPA is challenging Holt’s approval since he wasn’t a full-time uniformed coach this year, and that is likely what this botched article by Bill Madden is attempting to convey.  Even if a charge of pension fraud was filed by the MLBPA, or the agent of a coach separate from the MLBPA, it sounds like it’s dead in the water because MLB released a statement saying Holt was approved and there is no ongoing investigation that could result in discipline for Elias/Orioles.     Simply put, Bill Madden did a piss poor job of reporting this accurately, and tried to connect it with the Astros, which is why the article lead with “Ex-Astros” and “fraud” to get readers to click on it.  In reality, all Madden had to do is verify the story with MLB, like our local beat writers did, and he would have been told that this is a non-issue because Holt received prior authorization from the league to receive pension benefits, meaning this was not some covert, fraudulent attempt by Elias to get Holt on the pension plan without going through the proper approval process.  That’s why most of us thought from the very start that this story didn’t pass the smell test, and now we know we were proven correct in that assessment.
    • Journalism is a lost art nowadays in this day and age of blogging and tweeting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...