Jump to content
MurphDogg

Akin promoted, Mullins optioned

Recommended Posts

Just now, Lucky_13 said:

Could always move Wojo or Leblanc to the pen.  And although likely they may have a trade for Cobb in the works or something. 

It probably depends on how Akin looks if he starts tomorrow. 

*not likely

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lucky_13 said:

Could always move Wojo or Leblanc to the pen.  And although likely they may have a trade for Cobb in the works or something. 

It probably depends on how Akin looks if he starts tomorrow. 

Cobb has looked solid but is still owed a good bit of money. I bet Orioles would have to eat a bunch. 

Let’s hope Akin pitches well and see what happens.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Then it will be a one and done unless they go to 6 starters. 

Hard to say.  A lot depends on how Akin, Eshelman and Wojo pitch.    Wojo spot in the rotation is not nailed down.  He could go to long relief.    Eshelman has options which makes him vulnerable to being sent down.  And Akin has to show he is ready for the majors.  Could go several different ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Hard to say.  A lot depends on how Akin, Eshelman and Wojo pitch.    Wojo spot in the rotation is not nailed down.  He could go to long relief.    Eshelman has options which makes him vulnerable to being sent down.  And Akin has to show he is ready for the majors.  Could go several different ways.

I'm sure they have a plan that isn't based on the outcome of one extremely small sample size game by Akin, or Wojo's next start, or Leblanc's.   Not that it couldn't change if results are extreme.

But when you have 7 games in 6 days and one of your starters is on bereavement leave, you need a 6th starter, so bringing him up for a 1 and back, especially if it fits when his next "turn" would be in Bowie, is definitely a possibility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I'm sure they have a plan that isn't based on the outcome of one extremely small sample size game by Akin, or Wojo's next start, or Leblanc's.   Not that it couldn't change if results are extreme.

But when you have 7 games in 6 days and one of your starters is on bereavement leave, you need a 6th starter, so bringing him up for a 1 and back, especially if it fits when his next "turn" would be in Bowie, is definitely a possibility.

Yes. Very intelligent response as usual. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Only possible logic is if they start taking playing time away from Davis and let Sisco DH some. 

I’m all for letting Sisco get at bats. Even if the O’s can’t decide on his long term future with a 60 game season, I want to see players who might have a future get playing time. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I'm sure they have a plan that isn't based on the outcome of one extremely small sample size game by Akin, or Wojo's next start, or Leblanc's.   Not that it couldn't change if results are extreme.

But when you have 7 games in 6 days and one of your starters is on bereavement leave, you need a 6th starter, so bringing him up for a 1 and back, especially if it fits when his next "turn" would be in Bowie, is definitely a possibility.

Sure its possible.   But Akin is hopefuly a part of the future.  So if he has a good start they probably do not send him back down.     Wojo is probably not part of the future.  He here at the present and he is out of options.  And the O's are not going to waiver him now .  So he could slide over to the pen.  Eshelman has options, is a soft tosser and is not esblished in the majors.   He is more likely to go back to Bowie if Akin has a good start.

Know that Milone and LeBlanc are fill-in starters with experience.    They can be traded to make room if there are starters that are pushing up from Bowie.  But someone has to want them.   The O's are not going to reliease them in a pandemic and loss depth for nothing.

So yes I think there is an overall plan in the works here.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Sure its possible.   But Akin is hopefuly a part of the future.  So if he has a good start they probably do not send him back down.     Wojo is probably not part of the future.  He here at the present and he is out of options.  And the O's are not going to waiver him now .  So he could slide over to the pen.  Eshelman has options, is a soft tosser and is not esblished in the majors.   He is more likely to go back to Bowie if Akin has a good start.

Know that Milone and LeBlanc are fill-in starters with experience.    They can be traded to make room if there are starters that are pushing up from Bowie.  But someone has to want them.   The O's are not going to reliease them in a pandemic and loss depth for nothing.

So yes I think there is an overall plan in the works here.  

I would assume Eshelman, Hess, and Phillips are most in danger of being sent down. They all have options and seem to be the worst three on the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, VaBird1 said:

I would assume Eshelman, Hess, and Phillips are most in danger of being sent down. They all have options and seem to be the worst three on the team.

In our dream world, Eshelman is sent down after tonight's start and we bring up Mountcastle, so we only play one game with just 3 outfielders.   Then when Means comes off the DL it's either Hess going down or Akin going back to continue to work in Bowie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteveA said:

In our dream world, Eshelman is sent down after tonight's start and we bring up Mountcastle, so we only play one game with just 3 outfielders.   Then when Means comes off the DL it's either Hess going down or Akin going back to continue to work in Bowie.

I know we don't want to "yoyo" prospects.   But how much of a yoyo is it to bring Akin up for two days?   It's not like a normal season when he would have to pack his things, leave Norfolk, find a way to Baltimore, find a place to stay in Baltimore for a short period, live out of a suitcase while up here, then go back to Norfolk.

Assuming he is living somewhere near Bowie, it just means instead of driving 5 minutes to Bowie Stadium, today and tomorrow he drives 25 minutes to Nats Park.   He still sleeps in the same bed each night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

I would assume Eshelman, Hess, and Phillips are most in danger of being sent down. They all have options and seem to be the worst three on the team.

I agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I know we don't want to "yoyo" prospects.   But how much of a yoyo is it to bring Akin up for two days?   It's not like a normal season when he would have to pack his things, leave Norfolk, find a way to Baltimore, find a place to stay in Baltimore for a short period, live out of a suitcase while up here, then go back to Norfolk.

Assuming he is living somewhere near Bowie, it just means instead of driving 5 minutes to Bowie Stadium, today and tomorrow he drives 25 minutes to Nats Park.   He still sleeps in the same bed each night.

IMO its not about how much trouble it is to travel or relocate.  Its about is he ready to play in the majors or does he have more ro work on in Bowie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wildcard said:

I don't get the general dislike for Velazquez on this board.   Is he because he doesn't hit?   He is a defensive backup.  I don't expect him to hit much.  If he did he would be a starter.  The guy can play defense.

If you can't hit, if you play more than a game or two as a substitute you are a negative part of the team. So you have to hit some.  The D never can really make up for being a hole in the lineup. That is old fashioned National League ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, weams said:

If you can't hit, if you play more than a game or two as a substitute you are a negative part of the team. So you have to hit some.  The D never can really make up for being a hole in the lineup. That is old fashioned National League ball. 

Unless your a great framer!  That's so valuable you don't have to be able to do anything else.  😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was one of the Akin cheer squad a few years back.  I believed in him. I have seen him pitch a ton of games in person. Something is there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Yes, a player COULD benefit from the instruction league, even though its a fact that no one has ever benefited enough to be a starter on the major league level the following year, AND he COULD also be in an auto accident and not be able to play any sports. How much is the Instruction League going to help him then.  The topic of this thread is about the player, but the real discussion is about each Poster's value system . . . intelligence or athletics!
    • You must have seen a different guy than I saw.  He committed 4 errors in 9 games.  3 of those at SS.  From his minor league history I think he might have a chance at 2B but not SS.
    • I would say that's crazy, but after this year, I'd say nothing is out of the question.  The only thing they have going for them is they have a successful major league season under their belt with no deaths and limited interruptions (not surprisingly). Even if they don't want to have a season at all the stadiums and all the travel, they should be able to have a Florida and Arizona camp leagues like they should of had this year.
    • I’d say maybe yes, maybe no. He spends 4-5 weeks playing with and against other professionals, gets some coaching, gets some eyes on him and they give him a program for what to do over the winter based on that experience and maybe he gets some of his own ideas of what he needs to work on based on that experience.   That gives him a leg up on next year compared to not doing it.   If they thought Fall Instructs didn’t benefit players, they wouldn’t do them, right?
    • Honestly, I don't think you can say that. You are probably right but maybe they uncover a swing adjustment that he can take into the offseason and perfect?  It's conceivably possible that his career could be impacted. As for what is more important?  This is hardly the only chance he has to work on his degree and it's pretty unlikely that having a degree in recreation and sport management will make a difference in the next year or so.  I'd say working on his degree right now isn't that important compared with professional baseball.  
    • Interesting Reading this thread: It's a fact that no one on this board has perused his contract . . . potential clause for getting his degree or not! It's a fact that no one has knowledge of anything discussed between the Orioles and him beyond the contract. It's a fact that no one here is aware of his medical condition.  It's a fact that his degree earned will be his for a lifetime. Now, what's more important, him getting his degree or playing for a few weeks? Is playing for the Orioles during this short 2020 period going to have ANY impact on his career? NO
    • No surprises in the first four players waived off the 40-man. David Hess has had many chances, but his straight fastball and lack of consistent stuff will never really play at the major league level. Andrew Velazquez  showed he was decently versatile, but also showed his previous inability to hit was his level of hitting. Slow bat, just doesn't bring enough to hold down a utility job unless a team is just looking for versatility and no bat. Kohl Stewart former first round pick decided to be one of the few major leaguers to opt out due to COVID despite having a real chance at make a major league starting rotation for the first time. No issues with letting a guy go who gave up a golden opportunity at the big league level. Branden Kline Got good results in his three outings but his changeup and slider actually backed up in movement. At 29-years old, he's not a spring training.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...