Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wildbillhiccup

Why Can't the Orioles Develop Starting Pitchers?

Recommended Posts

First Jake Arrieta left and won a Cy Young and now Dylan Bundy seems like he might be  poised to do the same. I'm happy they've both had success, but why can't the Orioles solve the starting pitching riddle? I used to chalk part of it up to OPACY, but last year park ranked 15th (a far cry from Coor's Field) so that seems like a hollow excuse. And even the Rockies have had some success developing pitchers. What are we doing wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to come up with a name for a curse. 
 

Bundy looks great but I expect him to settle into an ERA closer to 3.50. 
 

Certainly frustrating though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. I mean he's an early season wonder often, but this seems like more than that. Only given up 2 HR's and 3 BB's. I think he was trying to reinvent himself the last year or so once he could no longer be a power pitcher. Guess it's all come together. Happy for him. Disappointed for us. Even Gausman is throwing up some decent ones in SF (although I know he's subject to up and downs, although his FIP is always usually solid). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

First Jake Arrieta left and won a Cy Young and now Dylan Bundy seems like he might be  poised to do the same.

That's positively wildcard-ian of you.  He hasn't even pitched 30 innings this year and you've handed him the Cy Young.

For me, I'm going to need another start or two before I'm sure he can hold off Alex Cobb and Tommy Milone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article is very informative about his evolution. Without the velocity, he has to maintain the sharp quality of all 4 pitches plus command to maintain his current production. It's likely hard to keep that level of sharpness. But he also sounds like a guy that has learned a lot the past few years and adjusted to the stuff he now has vs. the stuff he used to have. 

 

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/dylan-bundys-reincarnation-gives-angels-much-needed-rotation-ace/

Edited by Bubble Buddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's a curse? That's what we're chalking it up too? Seriously, I hope Elias has taken a long hard look at why this part of the organization has failed over the last 20 years. Whatever pitching philosophy they're using needs to be thrown out the door. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So it's a curse? That's what we're chalking it up too? Seriously, I hope Elias has taken a long hard look at why this part of the organization has failed over the last 20 years. Whatever pitching philosophy they're using needs to be thrown out the door. 

No, it's that not a lot has changed with Bundy but he's so far avoided allowing a homer every four innings.

I assume Elias was not going to keep any of the old organizational philosophies unless he had a really good reason to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy Small Sample Size, Batman!  Let's see how he does over an entire 162 game season.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

No, it's that not a lot has changed with Bundy but he's so far avoided allowing a homer every four innings.

I assume Elias was not going to keep any of the old organizational philosophies unless he had a really good reason to.

I feel like some of you are focusing on too much on Bundy. I wasn't advocating keeping Bundy, I was asking do pitcher inherently become better when they leave our organization? It's a distinct pattern that we've seen with SPs and RPs. We must be doing something wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I feel like some of you are focusing on too much on Bundy. I wasn't advocating keeping Bundy, I was asking do pitcher inherently become better when they leave our organization? It's a distinct pattern that we've seen with SPs and RPs. We must be doing something wrong. 

Other teams have huge failures too, its just Oriole fans are in tune with the blue chip prospects, and it stings when they fail.

There are positives in this org over the years.

Look at Zach, he pretty much had one foot off the roster and clinging on for life support. Came up with a new pitch for him, that turned him into a dominant reliever from a washup bullpen guy.

I dont really blame the org for Jake. I think Jake was stubborn and like Ed Rod, it took getting traded away to shake them up, to the point, they decided maybe they should listen to somebody else help them.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Other teams have huge failures too, its just Oriole fans are in tune with the blue chip prospects, and it stings when they fail.

There are positives in this org over the years.

Look at Zach, he pretty much had one foot off the roster and clinging on for life support. Came up with a new pitch for him, that turned him into a dominant reliever from a washup bullpen guy.

I dont really blame the org for Jake. I think Jake was stubborn and like Ed Rod, it took getting traded away to shake them up, to the point, they decided maybe they should listen to somebody else help them.

 

 

That's not accurate.

The pitch is the only reason he made it to the majors in the first place.  What actually happened was a combination of injuries and throwing to strings to improve command.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually am cautiously optimistic about the new regime's ability to develop pitchers.  Means is probably the most obvious case but many of the pitching prospects have been doing well in the minors and they seem to be willing to make windup/mechanical adjustments to help guys in the bullpen improve such as Castro, Scott so far. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's not accurate.

The pitch is the only reason he made it to the majors in the first place.  What actually happened was a combination of injuries and throwing to strings to improve command.

First 3 years on the big club as a starter. -1.1 / -.05 / -.4 WAR and a very struggling starter, and

Zach himself, said he knew if he was going to stick around, he had to figure it out, and then come ST

At age 26 and a new role as a Closer, his WAR blossoms and he saves 37 games.

mlb quote:

Quote

Since becoming a closer early in the 2014 season, Orioles southpaw Zach Britton has left his days as a struggling starter far behind. Although he might not have the national name recognition of an Aroldis Chapman or Craig Kimbrel, Britton has been as effective as any reliever over that time, ranking second in ERA (1.48), tied for fourth in saves (107) and in a virtual tie for first in save success rate (93 percent).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Redskins Rick said:

First 3 years on the big club as a starter. -1.1 / -.05 / -.4 WAR and a very struggling starter, and

Zach himself, said he knew if he was going to stick around, he had to figure it out, and then come ST

At age 26 and a new role as a Closer, his WAR blossoms and he saves 37 games.

mlb quote:

 

What does that have to do with your assertion that he came up with a new pitch?

He had shoulder injuries as a starter and uneven performance.  They moved him to the bullpen and worked with his command of the sinker...that he started throwing in 2007 after Calvin Maduro tried to teach him a cutter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

What does that have to do with your assertion that he came up with a new pitch?

He had shoulder injuries as a starter and uneven performance.  They moved him to the bullpen and worked with his command of the sinker...that he started throwing in 2007 after Calvin Maduro tried to teach him a cutter.

ok, relied on a new pitch, or reverted back to an old pitch, with new grip, same outcome.

Bottom line, he went from a mediocre struggling starter that was worth less than a replacement player, to a donafid dominant closer that for a few years could be considered one of the best at that position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Something in the analytics must show for Puig that Elias and company see.   You can get him enough at bats as most players don’t play 162 games.  The question is more how long will they keep Diaz down.  If they want him playing full time half the season then Puig makes some sense. I think Mancini will be like a 5 day a week player if you give Stewart a day off a week and Santander a day off every two week and same with Mountcastle you can get Puig 4 days a week and still giving most the at bats to those 4.
    • At the end of the day, you guys are right. The market dictates the value and the market decided he was not worth what he was going to get in arbitration. Whether his previous production and age suggests he SHOULD be worth that, the market decided it was not. 
    • I'm not going to lie, but that is up there for one of the greatest lines in Hangout history.
    • I agree.    If you let Nunez go, it shouldn’t be primarily because of cost.    Now, if you think you can get equivalent or better production for your roster cheaper, that is okay.  But you don’t make your team worse over $2 mm or less.     It’s going to be interesting to see what happens with Nunez.    There’s going to be a lot of players on the market after the non-tender deadline I suspect.    I do think he’ll get a major league contract somewhere and will get above the minimum, but it might be less than he was projected to get in arbitration.     
    • Shaw would not crack our top 30.
    • With the injury histories of Hays, Santander and relative inexperience with mixed results of Mullins and Stewart, I'm not sure we can say that. No Nunez did clear waivers and no one traded for him so perhaps there is something else going on here with him, but the guy has been a pretty productive bat and is just going to be 27 years old next year. Either way, I get what you are saying about Shaw and I agree, I think Elias will end up DFAing him and trying to keep him in the system.
    • I'm not excited that the team is making moves because guys are cheap, especially when the other option is around $2 million, which should be chump change for major league organizations. I'm just not sure I get this particular set of skills. Now perhaps Elias is going to DFA him and try to sneak him into the minor league system as depth. I guess there are worse guys to do this with, but I really would like to think this is a transition year where the Orioles are starting to bring up guys that will be contributors to a winning future and not place holders.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...