Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Cole Sulser: not closer material

Recommended Posts

I can see Hyde's logic. Sulser was very effective early on, but hit a bad stretch lately and it got to his head... thus command. A "breather" in lower pressure situations might work to reset his confidence.

Meanwhile, I'm really liking what I'm seeing from Tate (maybe not as closer, yet, but still).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Not every quality reliever has the intestinal fortitude to be a closer.

It take a special mindsight that some dont have.

Other Posters have disagreed with me, but I think its easy to see the failures over the years of those that tried.

Yes, sometimes, #2 man, can step up and assume the job and perform it well.

Yet, sometimes, they arent able to.

 

That statement would be just as, or more, valid if you didn't have the first two sentences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That statement would be just as, or more, valid if you didn't have the first two sentences.

True, but I have seen solid #2 guys want closer money and everybody assumes they are so good locking down the game for the closer, they can be the closer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

True, but I have seen solid #2 guys want closer money and everybody assumes they are so good locking down the game for the closer, they can be the closer.

I, for the life of me, can't think of a set-up guy that was making ~closer money that couldn't handle stepping in to close.

Which guys are you talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I, for the life of me, can't think of a set-up guy that was making ~closer money that couldn't handle stepping in to close.

Which guys are you talking about?

Tommy Hunter, you ought to remember him. Need to do some  brain thought for some others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Tommy Hunter, you ought to remember him. Need to do some  brain thought for some others.

What, when he was with the Phillies?  He had four saves  and 11 games finished over those two seasons.  He sure wasn't making closer type money with the O's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What, when he was with the Phillies?  He had four saves  and 11 games finished over those two seasons.  He sure wasn't making closer type money with the O's.

#2 guys, want the closer role, so they can get closer money.

My memory must be failing, but I thought back around 2014, Buck experimented with Hunter as a closer and he failed a few times, and Buck pulled the plug on it.

Before that time, Hunter has been a solid setup guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

#2 guys, want the closer role, so they can get closer money.

My memory must be failing, but I thought back around 2014, Buck experimented with Hunter as a closer and he failed a few times, and Buck pulled the plug on it.

Before that time, Hunter has been a solid setup guy.

Buck might have, but Hunter wasn't making anything close to closer money with the O's.

Shame about Buck and his allegiance to the save rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

#2 guys, want the closer role, so they can get closer money.

My memory must be failing, but I thought back around 2014, Buck experimented with Hunter as a closer and he failed a few times, and Buck pulled the plug on it.

Before that time, Hunter has been a solid setup guy.

Hunter did replace Johnson in 14 before Britton took over. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Hunter did replace Johnson in 14 before Britton took over. 

Hunter started out well, and then he couldnt pitch well unless he was in the stretch, which doesnt work well.

Hunter blew a few games, and he lost his closer spot.

He spent a long time knocking around the league after 2014, dont think he got many saves.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why this team needs to declare a closer. Play the matchups, use science. Why would you bring in your RH "closer" to face 3 LH hitters, one of which he has bad numbers against when you could use your LH guy that has great numbers against all three of the due up batters? It's not like any of our guys are going to be the next Rivera.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some interesting stats come up when I try to find the most notorious Orioles ever for blowing saves. It's a manual calculation since I can only find Saves and Save Opportunities. At the high end of saves leaders it's common to see a half dozen blown saves, so I looked further down for worse percentages and perhaps the duds that lost their closer roles (5+ BS). Here goes, with some surprise entries for "Gasoline Alley" including a few on pennant winners and contenders. The much maligned Givens has some good company there:

1974 Grant Jackson 12 / 19
1970 Eddie Watt 12 / 19
2019 Michael Givens 11 / 19
2014 Tommy Hunter 11 / 17
2009 Jim Johnson 11 / 16
2011 Jim Johnson 9 / 14
1989 Mark Williamson 9 / 15
2007 Jamie Walker 7 / 13
2015 Darren O'Day 6 / 11
2000 Buddy Groom 4 / 11
1985 Tippy Martinez 4 / 12
2000 Mike Trombley 4 / 11
1977 Dick Drago 3 / 9
1996 Alan Mills 3 / 8
1990 Curt Schilling 3 / 9
2012 Pedro Strop 3 / 10
1987 Mark Williamson 3 / 10
2016 Brad Brach 2 / 7
2007 Chad Bradford 2 / 7
2010 Jim Johnson 1 / 6
2017 Michael Givens 0 / 6
2004 Jason Grimsley 0 / 6

Strangely missing from this list are the would-be "bad closers" I would expect to see: the likes of Terry Mathews, Mike DeJean, Kevin Gregg... wait, there's one: Mike Trombley. I guess they lost games in earlier innings and never deserved many true save opportunities. I wonder what stat "leader" board would list such culprits that stick out most in our jaded memories...

PS Last year's Givens earns his rep here by leading the pack with 8 BS, tied with 1985 Tippy. Sulser's line so far: a rather modest 5 / 8. Recency bias, anyone?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Save percentage is biased heavily against set-up men. They can only blow the "save," when they are unlikely to ever close that game and get the save. 

Probably hard to do, but final inning blown saves would be more informing.

Edited by gtown
added last line
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, now said:

Some interesting stats come up when I try to find the most notorious Orioles ever for blowing saves. It's a manual calculation since I can only find Saves and Save Opportunities. At the high end of saves leaders it's common to see a half dozen blown saves, so I looked further down for worse percentages and perhaps the duds that lost their closer roles (5+ BS). Here goes, with some surprise entries for "Gasoline Alley" including a few on pennant winners and contenders. The much maligned Givens has some good company there:

1974 Grant Jackson 12 / 19
1970 Eddie Watt 12 / 19
2019 Michael Givens 11 / 19
2014 Tommy Hunter 11 / 17
2009 Jim Johnson 11 / 16
2011 Jim Johnson 9 / 14
1989 Mark Williamson 9 / 15
2007 Jamie Walker 7 / 13
2015 Darren O'Day 6 / 11
2000 Buddy Groom 4 / 11
1985 Tippy Martinez 4 / 12
2000 Mike Trombley 4 / 11
1977 Dick Drago 3 / 9
1996 Alan Mills 3 / 8
1990 Curt Schilling 3 / 9
2012 Pedro Strop 3 / 10
1987 Mark Williamson 3 / 10
2016 Brad Brach 2 / 7
2007 Chad Bradford 2 / 7
2010 Jim Johnson 1 / 6
2017 Michael Givens 0 / 6
2004 Jason Grimsley 0 / 6

Strangely missing from this list are the would-be "bad closers" I would expect to see: the likes of Terry Mathews, Mike DeJean, Kevin Gregg... wait, there's one: Mike Trombley. I guess they lost games in earlier innings and never deserved many true save opportunities. I wonder what stat "leader" board would list such culprits that stick out most in our jaded memories...

PS Last year's Givens earns his rep here by leading the pack with 8 BS, tied with 1985 Tippy. Sulser's line so far: a rather modest 5 / 8. Recency bias, anyone?

You can’t conpare the save percentages of closers and non-closers.    Say O’Day comes in for the 8th inning with a one-run lead.   If he doesn’t allow a run, but leaves the game after that inning, he gets no save.    If he allows a run, it’s a blown save.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • 1966 ranks 107th of the 115 World Series ever played?   The hell with that!    That series was a huge upset and featured two 1-0 nail biters.  1970 ranks 95th?    The great O’s team over the Big Red Machine?   Brooks puts on the best defensive show of all time and this is what we get? 1983 ranks 84th?    So all three Orioles wins are in the bottom 32 World Series ever played, and worse than every World Series they lost?   Aargggghhh! Now for the killer: you have to jump all the way to 36 for Mets vs. Orioles in 1969.    Other than the fact that the Mets were a terrible team before ‘69, what about that series is better than 1983?    They are both 5 game series where the winning team lost the opener and then swept 4 straight.   Screw this!  This is why I hate all New York sports teams so much.     1971 — 20th.     1979 — 13th.    Now, I can’t really argue that, objectively speaking, the two seven game losses to the Pirates weren’t better World Series than the four other 4-5 game Series that the O’s played.  But lord it pains me to see them up so high.   And just to add insult to injury: “When Eddie Murray batted in the eighth inning of Game 7, the championship leverage index in the moment was higher than for any other play in history. He flied to the edge of the warning track, and after a slightly awkward break, Dave Parker ran it down. Five more feet and it could have looked a lot like the ball Nelson Cruzmisplayed, for which David Freese got a triple, in 2011.” https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29104085/ranking-every-world-series-mlb-history
    • FV dropped from 50 to 45 and ceiling dropped from 55 to 50.   That feels a little harsh to me.   But based on the write-up, it seems Tony heard some things about Diaz’s camp that were a bit more negative than what has been stated publicly.    I think Diaz is a guy who could exceed his projection if things go right for him.  
    • Ceiling grade dropped from 55 to 50 this year.    
    • Hopefully “better than those guys” is not the standard we’re trying to meet.   
    • One name I haven’t seen listed yet is Hunter Harvey, who is still rookie-eligible.  He was ranked 10th last year. For now I will assume he’s been downgraded after being somewhat less impressive in 2020 than in 2019, but it’s also possible that Tony didn’t realize he was still eligible.    The next two on last year’s list were Wells and Rom.   That’s not a pairing here, but Zimmermann did reach the majors and didn’t embarrass himself, so Wells and Zimmermann is possible.   Assuming Tony meant what he said about not shuffling the order of incumbent players who weren’t in Bowie, McKenna-Hall and Hall-Mayo aren’t possibilities since there are several incumbent players ahead of Hall.    That leaves Baumler-Mayo or Mayo-Baumler.    The latter seems more likely since Mayo was the higher pick and got the higher bonus.     As between Mayo-Baumler and Wells-Zimmermann, I think Tony will go with the younger pairing with more upside.    Wells and Zimmermann are both 5th starter/swingman types.   And my gut tells me that Wells not being invited to Bowie is a bad sign for him.   So I’m going Mayo-Baumler.   
    • Got this pairing correct.   Not that excited about Vavra’s writeup, though.    
    • I think it all depends on how much his deception plays up. He throws a little harder than Milone and his release point and extension on his release helps it play up as well.  I like him, but was disappointed that Elias didn't have him at the auxiliary camp. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...