Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Jim Callis on the Orioles’ 2020 Draft

Recommended Posts

Jim Callis weighed in on our draft with Melewski today:

“I thought it was one of the deeper drafts, one of the best drafts,” said Callis. “If I remember correctly, we had Kjerstad ranked 10th on our draft list. I did hear a lot of Baltimore media getting asked, ‘How could they take the 10th guy at No. 2?’ Well, there was not that big of a gap between 2 and 10.

“Now, they got a great deal. They got him for over $2 million under slot, which allowed them to do some other things. Plus, this guy hit from the start in the SEC and was the best lefty power hitter in the draft on the college side. And I think 6 to 10 were jumbled up for a lot of clubs. You could argue they got the sixth-best player. Because he was going to go lower, they got a great deal. You have to get talent and they took a talented guy at 2 and poured that money into Mayo and Baumler.

“If they had taken Austin Martin at two, you look at what he got from the Blue Jays, they wouldn’t have saved the money to get those guys. All six of their picks are interesting. You don’t usually get six guys that are close to the top 100 and sign them all.”

Callis said there were things to like about each O’s selection.

“Kjerstad is the best lefty power hitter in the draft. Westburg, another SEC performer. Shortstop with power, profiles at third base if he doesn’t stick at short. Real interesting guy. Hudson Haskin, a really gifted center fielder. Didn’t fly under the radar, but in a normal year he might have gone higher. He’s a tooled-up center fielder who as a draft-eligible sophomore played a year and change. So, he wasn’t as heavily scouted as guys who had been around for three years. Anthony Servideo really came on this spring. Had a great spring. Slick fielder and showed a lot more with the bat. Coby Mayo has the power and arm strength you want at third base. And Baumler is a projectable, athletic pitcher who no one thought was going to be signable and the Orioles got him.

“These aren’t just like interesting guys that go into the top 30. They’re all guys with a good amount of upside. It was a pretty impressive haul.”

MLBPipeline.com’s new O’s top 30, rates Kjerstad No. 3, Westburg No. 7, Haskin No. 14, Baumler No. 19, Servideo No. 21 and Mayo No. 25.

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/09/jim-callis-with-props-for-os-draft-plus-other-notes.html

  •  
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Jim Callis weighed in on our draft with Melewski today:

“I thought it was one of the deeper drafts, one of the best drafts,” said Callis. “If I remember correctly, we had Kjerstad ranked 10th on our draft list. I did hear a lot of Baltimore media getting asked, ‘How could they take the 10th guy at No. 2?’ Well, there was not that big of a gap between 2 and 10.

“Now, they got a great deal. They got him for over $2 million under slot, which allowed them to do some other things. Plus, this guy hit from the start in the SEC and was the best lefty power hitter in the draft on the college side. And I think 6 to 10 were jumbled up for a lot of clubs. You could argue they got the sixth-best player. Because he was going to go lower, they got a great deal. You have to get talent and they took a talented guy at 2 and poured that money into Mayo and Baumler.

“If they had taken Austin Martin at two, you look at what he got from the Blue Jays, they wouldn’t have saved the money to get those guys. All six of their picks are interesting. You don’t usually get six guys that are close to the top 100 and sign them all.”

Callis said there were things to like about each O’s selection.

“Kjerstad is the best lefty power hitter in the draft. Westburg, another SEC performer. Shortstop with power, profiles at third base if he doesn’t stick at short. Real interesting guy. Hudson Haskin, a really gifted center fielder. Didn’t fly under the radar, but in a normal year he might have gone higher. He’s a tooled-up center fielder who as a draft-eligible sophomore played a year and change. So, he wasn’t as heavily scouted as guys who had been around for three years. Anthony Servideo really came on this spring. Had a great spring. Slick fielder and showed a lot more with the bat. Coby Mayo has the power and arm strength you want at third base. And Baumler is a projectable, athletic pitcher who no one thought was going to be signable and the Orioles got him.

“These aren’t just like interesting guys that go into the top 30. They’re all guys with a good amount of upside. It was a pretty impressive haul.”

MLBPipeline.com’s new O’s top 30, rates Kjerstad No. 3, Westburg No. 7, Haskin No. 14, Baumler No. 19, Servideo No. 21 and Mayo No. 25.

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/09/jim-callis-with-props-for-os-draft-plus-other-notes.html

  •  

I watched Callis on Youtube.    He puts a big emphasis on the O's adding 6 players in the draft to their top 30.   I still have some questions about whether it was better to have Kjerstead, Mayo and Baumler over Lacy.   Lacy is listed as KC's #2 prospect.   I value front line pitching very high.   Only time is going to tell which direction is better.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great but like I said the day of the draft when you are picking 1-2 and have the largest pool this should be the expectation.

My concern is if they passed on a 5 win talent for a 2 win talent at 1-2 it is going to be very hard to make that up with the rest of the draft class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I watched Callis on Youtube.    He puts a big emphasis on the O's adding 6 players in the draft to their top 30.   I still have some questions about whether it was better to have Kjerstead, Mayo and Baumler over Lacy.   Lacy is listed as KC's #2 prospect.   I value front line pitching very high.   Only time is going to tell which direction is better.

You are correct, good pitching is expensive and rare. However, I think an argument can be made, a very strong argument, that good solid quantity is better than lonely quality.
Remember the farm is being rebuilt from the ground up and you want a whole lot of 50 FV guys on your prospects, rather than one 60 and a bunch of 40s. I understand where you’re coming from but I think in this case we did the right thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Great but like I said the day of the draft when you are picking 1-2 and have the largest pool this should be the expectation.

My concern is if they passed on a 5 win talent for a 2 win talent at 1-2 it is going to be very hard to make that up with the rest of the draft class.

Who says Kjerstad is a 2-win talent?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, rudyrooster said:

Who says Kjerstad is a 2-win talent?

I was throwing out a hypothetical.  I understand he might fall short of two wins.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Great but like I said the day of the draft when you are picking 1-2 and have the largest pool this should be the expectation.

My concern is if they passed on a 5 win talent for a 2 win talent at 1-2 it is going to be very hard to make that up with the rest of the draft class.

I think the key to Callis’ evaluation of our strategy is the following sentence: “there was not that big of a gap between 2 and 10.”    If that’s correct, then it’s a great strategy.    If it’s wrong, then it’s a lousy strategy.    I’ll be happy to discuss this again in 2027 or so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It’s not even the ABs, in my mind. If severino holds serve with his bat and shows that he’s cleaned up his defense, someone will be interested at the deadline. There’s pretty much always a playoff contender willing to give value for a quality second catcher it seems. 
    • So...I shouldn’t book a flight and hotel in March then?
    • Looking on Fangraphs, Shaw was not on their list of 37 prospects they rated.    So, I’d guess he would not crack our top 30.    
    • I decided we need a thread for weird, anomalous stats we come across from time to time.   Here’s a few I’ve seen in the last couple of days: - The 2020 Royals finished 26-34 and their bullpen had a 3.84 ERA, but somehow they had a 95% save rate (19/20). - The 2020 White Sox had a .143 BABIP at DH, and the Angels had a .187 BABIP there.    
    • Just to be sure my point isn’t misconstrued, this depends on the needs of a particular team as well as what’s available in the market at a given time.  WAR already accounts for the relative value of offense vs. defense, and how much offense is typically available at a particular position.   So overall a 1.5 WAR DH is just as valuable as a 1.5 WAR multiple position player.   But not for every team and not at all times. Looking around the AL, four teams had a .651 OPS or worse at DH.   You’d think a team like that could use a guy like Nunez.
    • So, does Shaw get a place in our top-30, or do we know yet?
    • DH is NOT a full-time position unless you’ve got Edgar Martinez on the roster. Rotating DH is for roster flexibility, resting a regular, playing a guy on a hot streak, easing back in after an illness, and so on. Devoting a roster spot to one guy who does nothing but hit is a foolish use of a spot, unless he’s a glorious, “proof there is a God” hitter. And Nunez isn’t. I looked up his offensive stats at Baseball savant. Of ten offensive categories, his percentile rank was above average in only two, and one of those just barely(xSLG was %55) his sprint speed was  fairly close at 43%, but in the other 7, he was 35% Or lower. That’s not Edgar territory. By comparison, Nelson Cruz was horrible in sprint speed( no bunt singles for HIM) and K rate, but terrific in every other category... and he’s 40. He IS a, “Proof there is a God” hitter. Man, Cruz is amazing. That was really one we let get away.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...