Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Mountcastle’s speed

Recommended Posts

We’ve mentioned in a few threads how Mountcastle seems much faster than previously billed.    Even Elias has noticed:

“I think the thing that has probably been the most surprising is how well he’s running,” he said. “This is a big young, gangly guy, and last year, he was still coming into his body. And when he showed up in Sarasota this spring, he was noticeably more coordinated and put together. You forget how young this guy is - he was 22 last year. And he had been going through growth spurts and his coordination and overall athleticism really kicked into a higher gear this year.“

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2020/09/os-head-to-bronx-for-big-series-and-elias-talks-prospects.html

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea they were talking about it last night.

He easily beat out that IF hit. I know the third baseman struggled to get it out of his glove but I think he beats that anyway.  He was way past the bag.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s impressed me the most is how quickly he gets out of the batter’s box as a righty. There are left-handed hitters of comparable speed that I think take longer getting to first. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, InsideCoroner said:

What’s impressed me the most is how quickly he gets out of the batter’s box as a righty. There are left-handed hitters of comparable speed that I think take longer getting to first. 

I'm waiting for OFFNY  to make a specific comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm waiting for OFFNY  to make a specific comparison.

Yeah, that’s not my specialty unless we’re talking about obscure metal bands from the late ‘80s / early ‘90s. Not a particularly useful area of expertise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, InsideCoroner said:

Yeah, that’s not my specialty unless we’re talking about obscure metal bands from the late ‘80s / early ‘90s. Not a particularly useful area of expertise. 

Narrow window.  I tossed something obscure out there yesterday to see if anyone could get the one obvious and one hidden thing that made it interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

Yeah, that’s not my specialty unless we’re talking about obscure metal bands from the late ‘80s / early ‘90s. Not a particularly useful area of expertise. 

You and me both. Loved me some Saigon Kick and Tora Tora!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we have a future All Star on our hands. Maybe a bit of a #wildcardsmallsamplesize, but he looks like a fixture for years to come. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, joelala said:

I think we have a future All Star on our hands. Maybe a bit of a #wildcardsmallsamplesize, but he looks like a fixture for years to come. 

I think it’s safe to say he’s going to be a plus bat based on his minor league track record. If he can be average or better defensively we will have a potential perennial all star type. I recall one of the announcers mention his arm the other day. Seems to me if he had enough arm to play SS he ought to be able to manage in LF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I think it’s safe to say he’s going to be a plus bat based on his minor league track record. If he can be average or better defensively we will have a potential perennial all star type. I recall one of the announcers mention his arm the other day. Seems to me if he had enough arm to play SS he ought to be able to manage in LF.

He didn't have enough arm to play SS.  It was the main reason they moved him off.

It does seem fine for left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Yea they were talking about it last night.

He easily beat out that IF hit. I know the third baseman struggled to get it out of his glove but I think he beats that anyway.  He was way past the bag.

Wasn't his first career hit also an infield single? He came up as a SS so we know he is athletic. 

12 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

What’s impressed me the most is how quickly he gets out of the batter’s box as a righty. There are left-handed hitters of comparable speed that I think take longer getting to first. 

Like a rich man's Nolan Reimold! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Mark Reynolds came up as a short stop.

Sort of.  He was drafted as a SS, and played 135 games there in the minors.  But maybe that was because every time he played third he terrified the young and innocent.  Even in A ball he had three years fielding under .900 at third.

And he's never played an inning at short in the majors.  It's hard to be blind and play short.  At least at third you can stick your glove out when you hear the crack of the bat and try to smother it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Sort of.  He was drafted as a SS, and played 135 games there in the minors.  But maybe that was because every time he played third he terrified the young and innocent.  Even in A ball he had three years fielding under .900 at third.

And he's never played an inning at short in the majors.  It's hard to be blind and play short.  At least at third you can stick your glove out when you hear the crack of the bat and try to smother it.

I'll be shocked if Mountcastle plays an inning at short.  Unless Buck comes back and trades for him.

I think Mountcastle was considered a SS coming out of HS about as much as Reynolds was.  I don't recall ever reading anything that predicted he would stay at short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My rule of thumb is that once a position is mentioned, it is very likely the new home.  Elias was on the broadcast a half-inning sometime after the trade deadline and his Vavra bullet was something like, "he's played shortstop, and he's really good at second base".

He is no longer a SS candidate in my mind in formulations of how the next good team all gets on the field, notwithstanding the 81 SS and 56 2B games in his pro career to date, or being an NCAA All-American SS.

Mountcastle is a perfect fit by the Jamesian trope that a LF is an outfielder who can run but not throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • And this, my friends, is why Chris Davis won’t be cut this winter.   Starting in May means the O’s would save $4-6 mm off his salary, assuming the salaries are cut proportionally to games missed.   By the way, I don’t know if that is a correct assumption, because I’m not sure if the deal that MLB cut with the players for 2020 carries over into 2021 or not if games are missed.    
    • My quibble here is that the term “market rate” means what teams are willing to pay.    I’d say teams don’t pay these players their theoretical value.    But we mean the same thing.    I don’t think the market is static.   Two players could have identical performance and demand could be higher or lower depending on circumstances.    Let’s say you have two players who each were worth 1.0 WAR.    One is a DH, the other is a middle infielder.    Those two players may have equal value hypothetically, but one could be in greater demand than the other depending on what’s available in the market.   A team that already has two DH types and a shortage of middle infielders is not going to be willing to pay the same amount for each player.       
    • Most of that abundance is/was RHB. a lefty replacement for Nuñez is a bit better balance. 
    • Just because a player is worth a certain amount of money according to WAR, doesn't mean teams are going to line up to pay a player that amount. A win is worth what, $8 or $9 million according to WAR? So according to that formula, Nunez is worth somewhere between $4 and $9 million. But most teams don't pay players worth two wins or less anything near their market rate. Sure, there might be an exception or two, or someone might be worth two wins or less who's finishing out an expensive contract that was priced based on them being worth more wins than that. Successful teams (without enormous budgets, and even then they still generally don't do this) pay free agent stars and superstars their market worth by WAR, and try to get the two win and under guys for dirt cheap to fill out the roster. This is what is meant by WAR not being linear. Guys like Renato Nunez aren't going to sign for anywhere from $4-$9 million, because it's not hard to stumble around in your farm system or on waivers and find guys for league minimum who have a good chance to be worth a similar amount. All of MLB just passed on the opportunity to pay Nunez a $2-$3 million salary and control his rights for two more seasons after next for the cost of a waiver claim. I imagine if he signs with a team, it will be for less than that amount. You can talk until you're blue in the face about how the formula dictates he's worth that, but if no one is willing to pay a price because they can get the same thing for less money somewhere else, then it's asinine to insist that they should have paid him $2-$3 million And come on. I don't think the Orioles are unique in their DH situation, and they've got a ton of corner outfielders and first basemen who need bats. We weren't the only team with "room" for him. Would they have kept him if they could have continued to pay him league minimum? Probably. What you're missing is that salary and production are two sides of the same coin. Yes, the Orioles cut Nunez because of money. Because his likely production was replaceable for less than $2-$3 million dollars
    • Nevin is a prospect at 23 years old.  1B is his best position.  He will probably stays on the 40 man roster all year. Shaw is an organizational player at 27.  His best position is Bat thus DH.  He is likely to be DFA'd to get him off the 40 man  roster and to Norfolk.
    • Barry Bonds did ok...    
    • If Ayala can improve his shooting that would be awesome.  Today was a good start.  I think Wiggins needs to improve his handles and slashing game to be the scorer that would need.  His catch and shoot game is pure.   Gonna need Marial to improve his offensive game as well.  We already know he will defend the rim (theoretically).  Needs to work on his conditioning.  Ultimately I think our lack of interior presence will be our demise, unless Smith and Scott really ball their face off. We have that Swiss guy Revas as well, I'm not expecting much from him though.  The lack of backcourt depth also might hurt unless Dockery and Smart grow quickly.  Can Ayala be the primary ball handler and distributor?  Maybe. I don't think this team will fall off as badly as most think.  Like you said, Morsell/Ayala/Wiggins will keep us in most games.  If Scott and Hamilton (who was a top 100 recruit going into BC) can step up then I think we could surprise some people.  I see us sneaking into the tournament as a 7-10 seed.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...