Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SteveA

Connelly: This time it really feels like the end for Chris Davis as an Oriole

Recommended Posts

https://theathletic.com/2067046/2020/09/15/connolly-for-the-first-time-it-feels-like-the-last-time-for-chris-davis-and-os?source=user-shared-article

Pay wall of course.  Opinion piece.

Connelly says whenever folks thought Davis might be done in the past, he never believed it.  Ownership just couldn't let go, they loved Davis for his work in the county, didn't want to embarrass him, hoped to get some last bit of value out of the contract, etc.

But this time feels different, he says.  The emergence of guys who will merit ABs next year in Mancini, Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle, Stewart, Santander.  The fact that Davis will be 35 next spring.  The fact that Hyde says Mountcastle may see time at 1B these last two weeks (I hadn't heard that, I've been out of town). 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

https://theathletic.com/2067046/2020/09/15/connolly-for-the-first-time-it-feels-like-the-last-time-for-chris-davis-and-os?source=user-shared-article

Pay wall of course.  Opinion piece.

Connelly says whenever folks thought Davis might be done in the past, he never believed it.  Ownership just couldn't let go, they loved Davis for his work in the county, didn't want to embarrass him, hoped to get some last bit of value out of the contract, etc.

But this time feels different, he says.  The emergence of guys who will merit ABs next year in Mancini, Hays, Mullins, Mountcastle, Stewart, Santander.  The fact that Davis will be 35 next spring.  The fact that Hyde says Mountcastle may see time at 1B these last two weeks (I hadn't heard that, I've been out of town). 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will believe it when I read an official press release saying it.   Not until then.     

I think the main driving factor regarding whether Davis gets released before next spring training will be whether the O’s are worried about losing players in the Rule 5 draft.    In the past couple years, it wasn’t very likely that the 41st player in our organization would get claimed, so leaving Davis on the roster over the winter didn’t have much downside.    This year could be different due to the better depth in our system.    That said, I haven’t really studied who needs to be added and who is likely to get subtracted.    
 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 2 years after this one, right?  I mean he's just getting worse.  I think it probably needs to go down one of the worst contracts in American sports history, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

It's 2 years after this one, right?  I mean he's just getting worse.  I think it probably needs to go down one of the worst contracts in American sports history, no?

The Machado deal.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It just seems like Davis himself doesn’t care. I don’t think he’s cared for the last several years, and he certainly gave indications he was phoning it in, but now, it’s as if no one is pretending anymore. He’s gone for now, and soon he will be gone for good.

Speaking of Rule 5, I sincerely hope that none of our PTBNL guys is eligible. That would be a pain.
Also, I wonder if this will be the first year in eons that we don’t make a rule 5 choice ourselves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

It's 2 years after this one, right?  I mean he's just getting worse.  I think it probably needs to go down one of the worst contracts in American sports history, no?

It’s certainly in the top 3 when it comes to baseball, and you could argue it’s the worst.    The other two are Pujols and Cabrera.    Both of those have a bigger gap between total payment and value of production, but at least those players have had positive value as players during their contracts, unlike Davis who has been sub-replacement.     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been no reason to cut Davis.

By that I mean, he wasn’t blocking anyone in the last few years.  So, you can keep him and hope something happens and he can at least earn some of the money you are paying him.

But that time has come and gone and now we have players who need those at bats and we need that roster spot.

He gone.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I will believe it when I read an official press release saying it.   Not until then.     

I think the main driving factor regarding whether Davis gets released before next spring training will be whether the O’s are worried about losing players in the Rule 5 draft.    In the past couple years, it wasn’t very likely that the 41st player in our organization would get claimed, so leaving Davis on the roster over the winter didn’t have much downside.    This year could be different due to the better depth in our system.    That said, I haven’t really studied who needs to be added and who is likely to get subtracted.    
 

So study it.  I'll start a thread and so can all chime in.   I don't think it belongs here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

There has been no reason to cut Davis.

By that I mean, he wasn’t blocking anyone in the last few years.  So, you can keep him and hope something happens and he can at least earn some of the money you are paying him.

But that time has come and gone and now we have players who need those at bats and we need that roster spot.

He gone.

Plus, now we have a taste of "winning matters."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the reasoning when we've hashed this before that it would never ever happen as long as covid cancellation of some of 2021 remained possible therefore saving the club $$$$ was correct.

I suppose it is an arcane calculation for Omar whether that possibility vs. the roster spot to use in the offseason represents "value".

Hopefully if Davis has had any a-ha moments lately, that part can be negotiable between the parties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Philip said:

It just seems like Davis himself doesn’t care. I don’t think he’s cared for the last several years, and he certainly gave indications he was phoning it in, but now, it’s as if no one is pretending anymore. He’s gone for now, and soon he will be gone for good.

Speaking of Rule 5, I sincerely hope that none of our PTBNL guys is eligible. That would be a pain.
Also, I wonder if this will be the first year in eons that we don’t make a rule 5 choice ourselves?

Obviously, I can not confirm nor deny, but being players not on the 60 man that requirement should be unlikely.

Combined with how many 2018 - 2019 draft guys that seem to be Elias targets, I really would be surprised if any were. 

Now watch it be all 6 to spite me...but I just don't think it makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So study it.  I'll start a thread and so can all chime in.   I don't think it belongs here.

I will study it between the end of the season and the time of the Rule 5 draft.    Generally, debating who is our 40th/41st best player who is eligible for Rule 5 has never been a favorite topic of mine.    I was never that worried about whether the Stevie Wilkersons of the world would get claimed.    But I do think this year might be a bit different.    I’ll worry about it once I see who’s on our 40 man roster as of September 27.

It’s also much harder to make judgments in the absence of a MiL season on which to judge many of the players.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • While having success at higher levels or the minor leagues or even in a taste of the big league is part of the evaluation process and lessens the risk profile of players, it is not the only criteria for placement on the list above another prospect. If you concerned over him being behind Kevin Smith, I'll tell you, I could have easily built a case for either to be above the other. They are very similar prospects as their scouting grades would show you. Smith gets the slight nod for being at more advance stage when he was 22 than Zimmermann was and for the the better slider command that gives him a better chance at his floor.
    • That’s not the way these guys get graded.   Yes you get some credit for how high you’ve gotten in the system, but ultimately the grades are about (1) your expected outcome, and (2) your ceiling.   Zimmermann has made it to the majors, which is great, but his most likely role is a swing man.   Other guys have more potential, if less certainty of reaching the majors.     That said, almost every guy on the list from no. 12 through no. 26 has been graded 45 FV/50 ceiling, so we are really splitting hairs here.   The only exceptions are Baumler and Mayo (both graded 50/60) who haven’t played beyond high school yet so there’s a lot of uncertainty there, and Hernaiz (45/55) who hasn’t played above the GCL.   Those are guys who could move up or down the list pretty significantly next year.     
    • A million for Tommy Milone? He’ll be lucky to get a minor league contract from someone. 
    • o   You better take a diamond ring ...... you better pawn it, babe.   o
    • The write up makes me think that he is not a starter that Hyde would want to rely on every 5th day.  Maybe more of a swingman.  So that makes it more likely the O's sign a Milone type to begin the season or maybe Milone himself if they can get him for a million for one year.
    • o   That's somewhat of a rare song in which Lennon and Harrison switched on and off for the lead and rhythm. Lennon essentially plays lead for the majority of the song, while Harrison strums the chords. Then for the lead guitar solo it's Harrison playing lead, while Lennon briefly strums the chords. Then at the end of the solo, Lennon goes back to (essentially) playing lead while Harrison strums the chords.   Somewhat similarly, in the song "I'm Happy Just to Dance with You" it's Lennon playing the dominant portion of the guitar (strumming/picking extremely fast) while Harrison strums the chords ...... the difference being that unlike the case with "All My Loving", there is no guitar solo in "I'm Happy Just to Dance with You."   o
    • Brian Kenny on with Russo just now had the observation Cash let his starter go past 18 Batters Faced 5 of the first 6 games.   Obviously a 1-0 score and all the big relievers "rested" in an elimination game different circumstances last night. Mad Dog was ready for blood, but Kenny sort of headed him off at the pass surprising by giving his agreement the Snell pull was incorrect. Given the scuffles of the 4-week postseason, I'm not sure sticking with Anderson as the A reliever did him any favors.  His stat producing robot mode was clearly offline (today the inevitable reports acknowledging fatigue a factor).  Fairbanks or Castillo probably would have been better picks last night for in-inning fireman. Kenny in the spot also had the Mad Dog (pining for Snell to have the Smoltz experience) counter the Dodgers did October with a 2-man rotation, and bullpenning to take the WS clincher and survive two NLCS elimination games.  Obviously in the 162, Urias and May take their turns and do fine, but the October Corbin blueprint got drawn a bit more heavily this year. Snell is kind of an interesting gray area of is he a good enough starter to transcend the 18-batter leash as is correctly done with Cole, etc.  He has the Cy, but also like a 3.50-ish expected ERA across the couple of years including the Cy.   I think the Rays see him more JA Happ than Clayton Kershaw.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...