Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
weams

Connolly: Duquette's Minor League

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Folks love to throw around terms like bust in regards to players who don't end up excelling in the majors.

Josh Hart is what a bust looks like.  He topped out at A+ ball.

Folks like Sisco and Stewart aren't busts, those are success stories.

Wasn't he RZNJs guy? I can just remember someone always telling me how wrong I was on Hart and then when the guy would get hot for a week or two he would post everyday and act like I was a knucklehead for doubting him. :D

I never liked the workout and a few game cuts I saw of him after he was drafted and then heard awful things about him down in extended by some good evaluators. 

Once he had the .586 OPS in Delmarva with a the poor K-B ratio, I was pretty sure he was a dud professionally. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think RZNJ tried pretty hard not to dismiss Hart based on his first season or two.    But Hart never really improved.    

I thought it was BP, not BA, that kept Hart highly ranked for a long time despite lack of performance.  I remember Stotle (who did some work for BP at the time) making some posts trying to defend BP’s ranking, although he wasn’t the one who had done the ranking.    
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Is it Dan's fault he signed the players in the first place?

Yes, yes it is.

For instance lots of folks questioned signing Matusz that year.

I’m supposed to believe Dan went over budget to sign Matusz?  The owner didn’t tell him before what he could or couldn’t spend? 

Dan knew the owner was going to sign Davis?

In 2015 they spent no money that offseason. The big moves were Snyder trade and Cabrera signing. Then in April he deals Webb. Makes no sense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Philip said:

Trading away a draft pick to save money is stupid, especially when so little money is involved. I think Matusz and Webb were both under 5 million. 

I agree. I find it hard to believe Dan did it willingly. 

You think O’Day/Gausman deal wasn’t about money? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s who has made the majors from Duquette’s drafts so far (each year in descending WAR order):

2012: Gausman, Hader, Walker, Kline,  (20.9 WAR)

2013: Mancini, Yaz, D. Hart, Brault, Crichton, Wynns, Harvey, Sisco, Yacabonis, Heim, Tarpley (17.2 WAR)

2014: Means, Scott, Hess, Wilkerson (5.1 WAR)

2015: Stewart, Mountcastle, Meisinger, Mullins (1.3 WAR)

2016: Akin, Hays (0.5 WAR)

2017-18 nobody yet

Obviously the later the year, the more incomplete the picture.  But that’s 25 players who’ve produced 45.2 WAR so far.

In that same time span:

TOR 30 players, 40.1 WAR

TBR 29 players, 10.9 WAR

NYY 33 players, 22.8 WAR

BOS 36 players, 12.4 WAR

Not bad by Duq I’d say.   
 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I agree. I find it hard to believe Dan did it willingly. 

You think O’Day/Gausman deal wasn’t about money? 

Of course they were about money, but that was slightly different. Matusz and Webb were,“Give us a token non-prospect and we’ll give you a draft pick...oh, and a declining player with a small salary, whom you can release the next day.”

I think the Webb pick was somewhere in the 70s, but the Matusz pick was ~20 picks sooner. I don’t remember Dans exact comments about the value of the picks, but they were dismissive. At a time when we’d lost several picks because of signing QA guys, those picks had value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Here’s who has made the majors from Duquette’s drafts so far (each year in descending WAR order):

2012: Gausman, Hader, Walker, Kline,  (20.9 WAR)

2013: Mancini, Yaz, D. Hart, Brault, Crichton, Wynns, Harvey, Sisco, Yacabonis, Heim, Tarpley (17.2 WAR)

2014: Means, Scott, Hess, Wilkerson (5.1 WAR)

2015: Stewart, Mountcastle, Meisinger, Mullins (1.3 WAR)

2016: Akin, Hays (0.5 WAR)

2017-18 nobody yet

Obviously the later the year, the more incomplete the picture.  But that’s 25 players who’ve produced 45.2 WAR so far.

In that same time span:

TOR 30 players, 40.1 WAR

TBR 29 players, 10.9 WAR

NYY 33 players, 22.8 WAR

BOS 36 players, 12.4 WAR

Not bad by Duq I’d say.   
 

We drafted Donnie Hart? I thought we got him from Ny. Meanwhile, quite a trip down memory lane.
Yes, overall not a bad job. Meanwhile, it’s also worth mentioning that Buck/ Dan didn’t consider Yaz worth even a cup of coffee on one of history’s worst teams, and he now has the leading WAR on the Giants, and Walker  was a gift for the D-Backs. That’s ok, though. It will be interesting to see what the others add to the list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Here’s who has made the majors from Duquette’s drafts so far (each year in descending WAR order):

2012: Gausman, Hader, Walker, Kline,  (20.9 WAR)

2013: Mancini, Yaz, D. Hart, Brault, Crichton, Wynns, Harvey, Sisco, Yacabonis, Heim, Tarpley (17.2 WAR)

2014: Means, Scott, Hess, Wilkerson (5.1 WAR)

2015: Stewart, Mountcastle, Meisinger, Mullins (1.3 WAR)

2016: Akin, Hays (0.5 WAR)

2017-18 nobody yet

Obviously the later the year, the more incomplete the picture.  But that’s 25 players who’ve produced 45.2 WAR so far.

In that same time span:

TOR 30 players, 40.1 WAR

TBR 29 players, 10.9 WAR

NYY 33 players, 22.8 WAR

BOS 36 players, 12.4 WAR

Not bad by Duq I’d say.   
 

Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.  

Mancini developed under Dan.  Brady gets some credit for working with Trey.  Hader was traded early so not developed with the O's.  Guasman may have been rushed.  Could have been better than he was with the O's.

Means wasn't much of a prospect under Dan.  It was Holt that helped him with the change which helped him have a good year in 2019.  They say you can't mess up the good ones but Dan certainly tried. Keeping Mouncastle at SS/3B for too long.   

Scott is coming around under Elias' team.

I like Dan and love the team he built in a short time after he joined the O's.  But player development of minor leaguers was not his strong suit.   He had a knack for acquiring players at the major league level and making a team into a winner.  And that is not a bad thing.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Philip said:

Of course they were about money, but that was slightly different. Matusz and Webb were,“Give us a token non-prospect and we’ll give you a draft pick...oh, and a declining player with a small salary, whom you can release the next day.”

I think the Webb pick was somewhere in the 70s, but the Matusz pick was ~20 picks sooner. I don’t remember Dans exact comments about the value of the picks, but they were dismissive. At a time when we’d lost several picks because of signing QA guys, those picks had value.

What he is suppose to say? The owner wanted me to cut salary and this is only way to acccomplish that? Of course he is going to downplay it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.  

Mancini developed under Dan.  Brady gets some credit for working with Trey.  Hader was traded early so not developed with the O's.  Guasman may have been rushed.  Could have been better than he was with the O's.

Means wasn't much of a prospect under Dan.  It was Holt that helped him with the change which helped him have a good year in 2019.  They say you can't mess up the good ones but Dan certainly tried. Keeping Mouncastle at SS/3B for too long.   

Scott is coming around under Elias' team.

I like Dan and love the team he built in a short time after he joined the O's.  But player development of minor leaguers was not his strong suit.   He had a knack for acquiring players at the major league level and making a team into a winner.  And that is not a bad thing.

I am very happy Elias is here. I think he was the right man for the job and we are in a good place. 

Keep in mind though Brian Graham who was a Buck guy, ran the minor leagues. He wasn’t even hired by Dan. 

I think our player development is in a much better place now. Odds are they would not have been as good with Dan. That said it was never his show to run. It was a mess.  

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

I’m supposed to believe Dan went over budget to sign Matusz?  The owner didn’t tell him before what he could or couldn’t spend? 

Dan knew the owner was going to sign Davis?

In 2015 they spent no money that offseason. The big moves were Snyder trade and Cabrera signing. Then in April he deals Webb. Makes no sense. 

I think that if you can't convince ownership to eat the Webb and Matuez contracts that yes, it 100% falls on you.  He signed them, neither one of them were needed and he had to trade away draft picks to get shed of their contracts.

That is 100% on Dan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

What he is suppose to say? The owner wanted me to cut salary and this is only way to acccomplish that? Of course he is going to downplay it.  

Obviously, whatever he would say was going to sound foolish and insincere. And it was both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I am very happy Elias is here. I think he was the right man for the job and we are in a good place. 

Keep in mind though Brian Graham who was a Buck guy, ran the minor leagues. He wasn’t even hired by Dan. 

I think our player development is in a much better place now. Odds are they would not have been as good with Dan. That said it was never his show to run. It was a mess.  

This is what matters. The big problems are gone, and we are improving the important things about the organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.  

It’s interesting to me that the AL East hasn’t seen much yield in this time period.    Tampa’s low numbers surprised me.    The Yankees’ total WAR is basically one player, Aaron Judge.    Again, nobody really knows what 2017-18 yielded yet, and even 2014-16 are probably incomplete in terms of impact players produced.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Its an interesting list but I wonder how many were developed well under Duquette.  The knock on Dan is not the drafting but the development.  

Mancini developed under Dan.  Brady gets some credit for working with Trey.  Hader was traded early so not developed with the O's.  Guasman may have been rushed.  Could have been better than he was with the O's.

Means wasn't much of a prospect under Dan.  It was Holt that helped him with the change which helped him have a good year in 2019.  They say you can't mess up the good ones but Dan certainly tried. Keeping Mouncastle at SS/3B for too long.   

Scott is coming around under Elias' team.

I like Dan and love the team he built in a short time after he joined the O's.  But player development of minor leaguers was not his strong suit.   He had a knack for acquiring players at the major league level and making a team into a winner.  And that is not a bad thing.

If the narrative you want is that most of Dan’s picks that have had success were “turned around” by the new group, that’s your prerogative. It’s a mostly unprovable position, that I think is mostly hooey. 
Did keeping Mountcastle in the infield hurt his development? Did Tanner Scott have the same issues throughout his early career and also exhibit them in the majors this year? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I don’t disagree with that at all, the reason I don’t understand this decision is because as has been mentioned you could get a better catcher than Severino for less money, but mainly, on defense, which is really what we need from catcher at the moment, neither of our catchers is worthwhile. Neither of them calls a good game neither of them frames very well, neither has what it needs to help the pitching. On offense, they each have major issues. I Personally would’ve gotten rid of Sisco long time ago, but I understand why he’s still here. But then why keep Severino? It doesn’t seem to make sense. The main thing is to help the pitching and neither of them does that.
    • Well, I did not expect you to agree with me.  But the facts are what the facts are.
    • If his salary is in the 7 figure range, he isn’t an Os target.
    • Mullins isn’t good.  Please stop talking about him like playing him a lot is a good idea. I don’t care what Hyde said publicly.  Every manager says stuff like that.  It’s meaningless talk.
    • Sure but that doesn’t mean you don’t play him everyday to make sure the light bulb doesn’t turn on.  He would hardly be the first player to take some time to get going and given how they have handled him and given him inconsistent at bats, it’s not surprising he has struggled. They don’t care about winning anyway, so play the young guy and see if he start to hit like he did for his pro career.
    • “Eddie Rosario is a good enough player to have his flaws scrutinized. He doesn’t reach base enough and he doesn’t add much outside of his pop. But that power has been consistent, and it makes him an above-average performer. Some within the game even believe that his production isn’t that far off from his projected salary. However, the Twins have Alex Kirilloff waiting in the wings. He’ll be paid near the league minimum. Meanwhile, Rosario will cost nearly $10 million. That’s a decent chunk of change for a team that could throw that money toward their pitching needs. Barring a surprise trade, Rosario is a good bet to enter the free agent pool.”
    • It seemed last year that the more Hyde played Mullins in center the more he liked him.    Mullins began the season with very little success in the majors in his passed two seasons.   But Mullins got a chance in August when Hays got hurt.  He did pretty well and end up getting 89 plate appearances in September. Its a SSS but in 2020 he had a 305/348/448/796 vs RHP.   And by the end of the season Hyde was saying Mullins should be considered for a Gold Glove.   That is coming a long way in a short period of time.   However, he did not hit lefties well.  Is the 38 PA he got he had a .216 OBP.  And getting on base and using his speed is his game. So going in to 2021 I think Hyde sees Mullins as his centerfield vs righties and  a his defensive CF when the team is protecting a lead in the late innings.    This put Hays in LF vs righties and in CF vs lefties.  That is good for several reasons.  1) Hopefully there a less of a chance of Hays getting hurt in left compared to CF.  2) It puts the O's two rangiest outfielders in the field together which is good for the defense. There is still a small amount of outfield playing time in LF vs lefties.   Diaz when is comes up will probably spell the outfielders in RF/LF and  DH.   He can play vs lefties in LF.   Until Diaz is promoted Mountcastle can move to left vs lefties.   Mancini can move to 1B and that opens DH for someone to hit vs lefties.   Maybe Urias or Stewart who does have some reverse splits.  Or Stewart could just play left for lefties.   But it is a small amount of at bat vs lefties for a short period of time. JMO  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...