Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Philip

Vulnerable 40-Man Spots

Recommended Posts

Vulnerable guys on the 40 man roster:

Davis
Hess
Carroll
Phillips
Velasquez
Wynns
Wojo( already gone)
LeBlanc
Eshelman
Fulmer
 

Wojo just got dumped but I leave him in because he was on when I started this.

I think Valaika and Ruiz are also vulnerable because they aren’t that good. No reason not to look for better. Nunez may be victim of roster crunch, but that is arguable. Martin can back up Iglesias and the Waiver wire/Non-Tender/rule 5 Activity will focus on finding a good( or at least better) 3B. Maybe too soon, but the end is looming so why not.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Philip said:

I think Holaday remains, at least for now.

Is he on a 1 year deal? I think if not, he gets DFA’ed. Either way, they might try and re sign him to a MiLB deal with a Spring Training invite.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

I don’t disagree with any of those choices, but I think some of them have more value than the guys who would replace them. I don’t think Kline or Sulser gets the axe just yet, and if we DFA Wynns, we need to keep Holaday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t disagree with any of those choices, but I think some of them have more value than the guys who would replace them. I don’t think Kline or Sulser gets the axe just yet, and if we DFA Wynns, we need to keep Holaday.

Players can be DFA'd and still get a minor league contract. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

Do you think anyone would add him in Rule 5 and carry him on a MLB roster? He is pretty low on my list but I could see protecting some of our other guys over him if we needed to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

I thought about putting Alberto here,  because his defense is lousy. But he’s not easily replaced, And infield is where we are weakest. Iglesias is good, no need to change. Alberto is Serviceable for now. He’s Arbitration-eligible for the first time this fall so he’ll get a raise, but not too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Players can be DFA'd and still get a minor league contract. 

Sure, but I think Holaday will remain and Wynns will go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Philip said:

I thought about putting Alberto here,  because his defense is lousy. But he’s not easily replaced, And infield is where we are weakest. Iglesias is good, no need to change. Alberto is Serviceable for now. He’s Arbitration-eligible for the first time this fall so he’ll get a raise, but not too much.

This will be Alberto's 2nd arbitration year.  He was awarded 1.65M last year and will probably get 3M this year.  JMG.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Philip said:

Sure, but I think Holaday will remain and Wynns will go.

I think they both go off the 40 man roster but one of them signs a AAA contract with the O's as the 3rd catcher.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

I think this will be the first year in a long time that pitching will not be the main priority of the off-season. I think the focus will be on assembling better all around infielders. Lopez’  2020 4.61 FIP Is almost a full run better than his 5.23 ERA, and as an Oriole, it’s better at 4.84 and 3.80, which is third-best on the team behind only Kremer and Akin( who have 31.1 innings between them.) I don’t know how he does it. His BABIP is only .220,(even though he’s not being helped by the defense) but I expect he’ll be here next April.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

This will be Alberto's 2nd arbitration year.  He was awarded 1.65M last year and will probably get 3M this year.  JMG.

At Fangraphs it said arbitration eligible 2021, but yes his salary is 1.65. I just have misread that. I think he’s worth 3 mill, and I doubt we’ll find anyone better for less, or even slightly more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I think you can disregard basically every number, in terms of using it for predictions, in a SSS.   He could go 8 for his next 8 and that BABiP would probably soar into the average range.  
    • I would think that a low number of at bats is not really a reason to disregard a low BABIP.    To me it’s an indication that the gap is likely to narrow as PA increase, meaning Santander’s BA would rise. The other trend that was good for Santander was his K% was easily the lowest of his career.   If he can maintain that rate (15.9%) he should be quite dangerous.   
    • I admit that my expectations are aggressive, no doubt. But that is what I expect from their talent and growth. Both are quite capable of taking the next steps and having these kinds of numbers. 
    • Yes the BABiP was low and unlucky in 2020 but so what?  Usually, I think that’s important but we are still talking less than 1/4 of the at bats in a full season.  Those numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt. That being said, he has never had a real high BABIP in his career.  I don’t know if that is a trend or something you gloss over because of the limited number of at bats and SSS in any given season.
    • Just to elaborate on this, here’s a comparison of Santander’s actual numbers from 2020 compared to his expected numbers based on quality of contact: BA .261 vs. xBA .286 SLG .575 vs. xSLG .510 wOBA .358 vs. xwOBA .338. The gap between his xBA and xSLG (call it xISO) is .224.    For me that’s a more realistic predicter of Santander’s ISO than his actual .314 from last year.     The good news in here is that Santander’s xBA is 25 points higher than his actual BA.    Philip pointed out that Santander had a low .248 BABIP, and it looks like at least some of that was due to poor luck.     Having looked at all this, I think my projection of .775-.800 OPS was a little conservative and I’d boost it to the .800-.825 bracket.   I continue to think .900 is very aggressive.   At the same time, Santander is still relatively young and inexperienced, so maybe he’ll prove to be better than I expect in 2021.     
    • That’s fine...and I agree he is improving but there is a difference between improving and taking a massive leap. I know  how much weight you put on SSS but last year, he had 165 PA.  He did that in less than 1/4 of a season.  While that’s something, it’s more nothing than something. First and foremost, he has to show he can play a full season.  He has never played more than 93 ML games in any season.  He has to prove that not only can he stay healthy and play everyday but that playing everyday won’t wear him down as the season goes on.  In 2019, he had 380ish PA and his OPs was under 600 for the last month of the season.  Did he wear down?  Just got cold?  Who k laws but he has to show that he can do it over 550+ at bats. He has basically shown, so far, that he is a guy that will hit 260-265.  Could that improve?  Sure.  Do I expect him to take some huge leap?  No way.  I would expect him to be in the 255-280 range.  Not a terribly low floor but not a high ceiling either.     As Frobby mentioned, his ISO isn’t likely to be sustainable, so predicting a slugging around 500 (career 476) makes sense to me.  That is improvement. Its the OBP that gets me here.  His just doesn’t walk much.  Yes, in the SSS of last year, his Bb rate improved a little.  Could it go to 7 or even 8%?  Yes, I think it can.  As he shows more power and continues to improve, it’s possible teams stay away from him more.  If he does that, that brings him into the Nunez area of walk rates.  Nunez was roughly a 250/310 hitter with a 7.5ish% walk rate.  As I said, I would expect Santander to have a better BA and that is what will drive that OBP.  So, even if he got into those Nunez rates, we are still talking a 315-340 OBP.     RZ’s projection is on the high side of a reasonable ceiling.  Reasonable being defined as something that you don’t have to sit there and be overly optimistic to say he can get there.  Playing the odds so to speak. Im just not sure where you think he can realistically add another 50 points of OPS. Especially when you factor in the idea that you are essentially saying if he has an 800-850 OPS, that you would be disappointed in his season. 3 of the last 4 years, we have seen about an average of 25 players have a 900 OPS or higher.  That includes the SSS of last year.  Prior to that stretch, it was usually in the 15 player range.     I think Mancini is a more complete hitter than Santander is.  You are essentially saying Santander will take the same leap Mancini did in 2019.  One difference is that Mancini had already shown he could play a full season and that he could hit in the 290s at the ML level.  His leap was still totally unexpected, at least to the level it went and I would be surprised if he got to that level again.  Again, it’s possible...but I think it’s over the top to say it should happen.  Let’s see if he can even play 120 games first.
    • Good for that guy.  Glad he found success somewhere.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...