Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Philip

Vulnerable 40-Man Spots

Recommended Posts

Vulnerable guys on the 40 man roster:

Davis
Hess
Carroll
Phillips
Velasquez
Wynns
Wojo( already gone)
LeBlanc
Eshelman
Fulmer
 

Wojo just got dumped but I leave him in because he was on when I started this.

I think Valaika and Ruiz are also vulnerable because they aren’t that good. No reason not to look for better. Nunez may be victim of roster crunch, but that is arguable. Martin can back up Iglesias and the Waiver wire/Non-Tender/rule 5 Activity will focus on finding a good( or at least better) 3B. Maybe too soon, but the end is looming so why not.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Philip said:

I think Holaday remains, at least for now.

Is he on a 1 year deal? I think if not, he gets DFA’ed. Either way, they might try and re sign him to a MiLB deal with a Spring Training invite.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

I don’t disagree with any of those choices, but I think some of them have more value than the guys who would replace them. I don’t think Kline or Sulser gets the axe just yet, and if we DFA Wynns, we need to keep Holaday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

In order of most to least vulnerable I would add:

Urias

Kline

Lopez

Holaday

Valdez

Sulser

Ruiz

McKenna

Valaika

Depending on who we need to protect, I could see arguments for losing any of these guys. 

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t disagree with any of those choices, but I think some of them have more value than the guys who would replace them. I don’t think Kline or Sulser gets the axe just yet, and if we DFA Wynns, we need to keep Holaday.

Players can be DFA'd and still get a minor league contract. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

Do you think anyone would add him in Rule 5 and carry him on a MLB roster? He is pretty low on my list but I could see protecting some of our other guys over him if we needed to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I doubt the Lopez is vulnerable at this point.  He has done well and may end up in rotation on OD 2021.

McKenna is only 23.  I think he will get all of next year to show improvement.

Oddly enough I think Alberto belongs on this list.  He is doing just what he did last year.  Kill lefties and not hit righties.  How long will Elias put up with that as he gets more expensive?

I thought about putting Alberto here,  because his defense is lousy. But he’s not easily replaced, And infield is where we are weakest. Iglesias is good, no need to change. Alberto is Serviceable for now. He’s Arbitration-eligible for the first time this fall so he’ll get a raise, but not too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Players can be DFA'd and still get a minor league contract. 

Sure, but I think Holaday will remain and Wynns will go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Philip said:

I thought about putting Alberto here,  because his defense is lousy. But he’s not easily replaced, And infield is where we are weakest. Iglesias is good, no need to change. Alberto is Serviceable for now. He’s Arbitration-eligible for the first time this fall so he’ll get a raise, but not too much.

This will be Alberto's 2nd arbitration year.  He was awarded 1.65M last year and will probably get 3M this year.  JMG.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Philip said:

Sure, but I think Holaday will remain and Wynns will go.

I think they both go off the 40 man roster but one of them signs a AAA contract with the O's as the 3rd catcher.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

I think this will be the first year in a long time that pitching will not be the main priority of the off-season. I think the focus will be on assembling better all around infielders. Lopez’  2020 4.61 FIP Is almost a full run better than his 5.23 ERA, and as an Oriole, it’s better at 4.84 and 3.80, which is third-best on the team behind only Kremer and Akin( who have 31.1 innings between them.) I don’t know how he does it. His BABIP is only .220,(even though he’s not being helped by the defense) but I expect he’ll be here next April.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wildcard said:

This will be Alberto's 2nd arbitration year.  He was awarded 1.65M last year and will probably get 3M this year.  JMG.

At Fangraphs it said arbitration eligible 2021, but yes his salary is 1.65. I just have misread that. I think he’s worth 3 mill, and I doubt we’ll find anyone better for less, or even slightly more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • It could happen, we've already heard Mike Trout but as a SS two years running.
    • I’m just waiting for them to call a guy a more athletic Bo Jackson.  
    • o     Like his teammate )Tyler Glasnow, )Blake Snell )led the Major Leagues in Wild Pitches ...... but also like his (seemingly) wild-throwing teammate, he rarely hits a batter with a pitch. In his 5 Major League seasons between 2016 and 2020, Snell has only 2 Hit Batsmen in 556 Innings Pitched. )    Tony Gonsolin )has excellent raw numbers from the 2020 regular season. He had a 2.31 ERA and an 0.836 WHIP over 46.67 innings Pitched. And that's only a slight improvement from the 2019 regular season, when he tallied a 2.93 ERA and a 1.025 WHIP over 40 innings Pitched ....... he seems to be consistently excellent.     (WORLD SERIES) )))))) [GAME TWO]   TAMPA BAY DEVIL R AYS Austin Meadows - DH Brandon Lowe - 2B      Randy Arozarena - LF 崔志萬 - 1B  Manuel Margot Gomez - RF Joseph Patrick "J.P." Wendle - 3B Willy Rafael Luna Adames - SS Kevin James "K.J." Kiermaier - CF  Michael Zunino - C Blake Ashton Snell - LHP )) (4-2, 3.24 ERA) ) *   * )) Led the Major Leagues in Wild Pitches (7)   LOS ANGELES DODGERS Markus Lynn Betts - RF Corey Seager - SS Justin Turner - 3B Maxwell Muncy - 1B William Smith - C Cody James "C.J." Bellinger - CF Allen Lorenz "A.J." Pollock - DH Enrique Javier "E.J." Hernandez - 2B Christopher Armand Taylor, Jr. - LF  Anthony D. Gonsolin - RHP )) (2-2, 2.31 ERA)   https://www.mlb.com/starting-lineups   o
    • Yep, same thing when folks call a mid to late first round pick a bust because they are merely a ML player and not a really good ML player.
    • I think generally people tend to overestimate the number of players that a good farm system typically produces over a given period of time.   Let’s define a 50 as a guy who produces 10 WAR in the 6+ years he’s under team control.    In 2013, 200+ players debuted, but only 33 met that standard.    So basically, an average of one per team per year.   
    • As a kid of the 1970's, my hatred of the Yankees is well ingrained by now.  I happily vote WS where the Skanks lost pretty high.  Not higher than those our Orioles won, perhaps, but no Yankee win would occur before either of those two criteria are met.  And then there is every other team in the league to consider ahead of any NY win.  I don't think a Yankee win would even occur in my list... Sadly, it looks like Scott Van Pelt only had one measly vote.
    • It was 2nd division starter or utility guy, right? And with a 50 ceiling. That's a ML player who, best case, is a good starter on a good team or likely is still a guy with some value to a ML team. Especially if he can hold his own in the outfield. My take here is that: 1) Tony's understandably being conservative in general on this list because he hasn't seen a lot of these guys for a full year. 2) He's going by what he's heard. 3) There are guys lower on this list that are a bit farther away but who have higher potential. 4) Vavra, based on Tony and rankings from other sites with some credibility, has some potential to be a real contributor to the ML team within 2 years. I actually think Tony's grade is pretty accurate based on the feedback, but whether he should be ranked over Baumler, Mayo, Rom, Smith, Hall, Wells, Bradish, Stowers, Hernaiz, Haskin and others is up for debate and, ultimately, not really important. Heck, at least one site has him at 7. They must think he's decent. All those guys have risk and they all have had a big layoff from baseball, or at least from being seen. Vavra got put here because he's closer, he has produced on the field, and thus has somewhat lower risk, is my guess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...