Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Philip

Vulnerable 40-Man Spots

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Philip said:

I think this will be the first year in a long time that pitching will not be the main priority of the off-season. I think the focus will be on assembling better all around infielders. Lopez’  2020 4.61 FIP Is almost a full run better than his 5.23 ERA, and as an Oriole, it’s better at 4.84 and 3.80, which is third-best on the team behind only Kremer and Akin( who have 31.1 innings between them.) I don’t know how he does it. His BABIP is only .220,(even though he’s not being helped by the defense) but I expect he’ll be here next April.

We'll see. I don't see anything remarkable in his stuff or resume (OK, he had one awesome year in AA in 2015?). Would you keep him and leave Alex Wells unprotected if it came down to it? 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

We'll see. I don't see anything remarkable in his stuff or resume (OK, he had one awesome year in AA in 2015?). Would you keep him and leave Alex Wells unprotected if it came down to it? 

Absolutely not. I’m excited about Wells, and frankly I wouldn’t mind seeing him right now. Do you remember the old saying, “in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.” Well that’s kind of how I feel about Mr. Lopez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nunez needs to go. I don’t remember who was talking about how much value he had, but he’s worth exactly .01 fWAR and has a WRC of 109 and a BA of ~.240. He has exactly 0 value on defense, so send him on his way.

Edited by Philip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Philip said:

Absolutely not. I’m excited about Wells, and frankly I wouldn’t mind seeing him right now. Do you remember the old saying, “in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.” Well that’s kind of how I feel about Mr. Lopez.

I’m a huge Wells fan, but I question whether another team would claim him if he was unprotected.    He throws 86-89 mph, has not pitched above AA, and won’t have pitched competitively (not even at the alternate site) in a year and a half when next spring rolls around.    He’s a pretty big long shot to stick with a big league team for a year in that scenario, and it’s not like he’s a huge upside guy.   I do like him a lot, and I think in a normal situation where he’s had a full year of pitching AAA under his belt, he’d have a decent chance to stick.    But these are not great conditions.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m a huge Wells fan, but I question whether another team would claim him if he was unprotected.    He throws 86-89 mph, has not pitched above AA, and won’t have pitched competitively (not even at the alternate site) in a year and a half when next spring rolls around.    He’s a pretty big long shot to stick with a big league team for a year in that scenario, and it’s not like he’s a huge upside guy.   I do like him a lot, and I think in a normal situation where he’s had a full year of pitching AAA under his belt, he’d have a decent chance to stick.    But these are not great conditions.  

The fact he wasn’t even in the Bowie camp makes me wonder what is going on. It’s one thing if he was in Australia during this time and wasn’t able to fly back, or if he was dealing with an injury. But if he was in the US and healthy, that’s a pretty big blow to his chances.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

Yea, he hasn’t really been that good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m a huge Wells fan, but I question whether another team would claim him if he was unprotected.    He throws 86-89 mph, has not pitched above AA, and won’t have pitched competitively (not even at the alternate site) in a year and a half when next spring rolls around.    He’s a pretty big long shot to stick with a big league team for a year in that scenario, and it’s not like he’s a huge upside guy.   I do like him a lot, and I think in a normal situation where he’s had a full year of pitching AAA under his belt, he’d have a decent chance to stick.    But these are not great conditions.  

I agree with this.   I think there is a slim chance Wells get picked and even less of a chance he would stay on a teams 26 man roster for  a whole season.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m a huge Wells fan, but I question whether another team would claim him if he was unprotected.    He throws 86-89 mph, has not pitched above AA, and won’t have pitched competitively (not even at the alternate site) in a year and a half when next spring rolls around.    He’s a pretty big long shot to stick with a big league team for a year in that scenario, and it’s not like he’s a huge upside guy.   I do like him a lot, and I think in a normal situation where he’s had a full year of pitching AAA under his belt, he’d have a decent chance to stick.    But these are not great conditions.  

I’m pretty sure he would be claimed, but that would actually be good for the Orioles. If he does, he gets the benefit of coaching from the new team, and we can watch him develop, or not, on a real life stage. If it is unlikely that he does well Enough to stick, when he returns to us, we will have had the benefit of the empty roster spot, but also the benefit another team coaching, and whatever experience he has on the major league stage, if he gets that far.

And when he returns to us, we will have that much more knowledge and can deal with him more effectively.

Of course there’s always the risk that he makes it all the way with his new team, and I guess that’s the risk we have to take.

After all, TJ McFarland has had a pretty good career throwing in the upper 80s.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moves are being made to clear 40-man roster space. Carroll got through, Fulmer did not.

At 37 players on 40-man roster now.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Moves are being made to clear 40-man roster space. Carroll got through, Fulmer did not.

At 37 players on 40-man roster now.

As bad as Fulmer looked to me in his first outing, I thought he looked terrific in his second.    I’m a little surprised Elias let him go.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/18/2020 at 4:17 PM, Aristotelian said:

PS I disagree that Lopez has been good. Not bad I would agree with. And again, if keeping him means leaving any prospects unprotected he should be vulnerable. 

Lopez has an ERA and a FIP in 226 MLB innings over 5.00.  He's 27.  He's safe until the O's acquire a legit Grade C prospect and need to add him to the roster.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Frobby said:

As bad as Fulmer looked to me in his first outing, I thought he looked terrific in his second.    I’m a little surprised Elias let him go.   

Might have been one of those “try and sneak him in” moves.

Now, with the open 40 spots, how many more debuts will we get this final week?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Might have been one of those “try and sneak him in” moves.

Now, with the open 40 spots, how many more debuts will we get this final week?

Is there anyone who needs to be protected from the Rule 5 that is also ready to come up? Maybe Diaz or Mattson?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, interloper said:

Is there anyone who needs to be protected from the Rule 5 that is also ready to come up? Maybe Diaz or Mattson?

Both. They have a 3 man bench right now, so adding another player that can play the field seems like the better option. Maybe do it after someone pitches that won’t get another start this season and option them down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Might have been one of those “try and sneak him in” moves.

Yeah, they probably thought the odds were better now to sneak him through than after the season when everyone is churning their 40-man rosters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • I take yellow, because that would have had positive ramifications for several years, whereas blue, which is second place, maybe gets us past KC (maybe, as w were swept) and maybe gives us a chance against the Giants in the WS.  Yellow for me.
    • Case closed. 
    • Orioles did offer Cruz a contract, IIRC.  I believe they offered him a 3-year deal, which seemed reasonable considering his age.  It was a bit of a surprise that he got a 4-year deal from Seattle.  There really wasn't much of an outcry over the Orioles not going 4 years.  It seemed like a prudent decision at the time.
    • I understand.  I just think he was decent here in 1990 and decent in Houston in 1991, I'm not sure why he wasn't more highly regarded by both teams.  I agree he wasn't an obvious HoFer until his late 20s.   I think Finley was great.  An OF of Brady, Devo and Finley in the 90s would have been borderline elite defensively.  But he, too, really didn't kick into gear until his late 20s and early 30s.  And while I don't think he was ever named in the Mitchell report, it wouldn't have surprised me if he was using. Glenn Davis was very good, probably tied with Will Clark and Jack Clark as the preeminent slugging first baseman in the NL in the late 80s.   
    • I don't think Schilling is a deranged lunatic.  He has some unpopular opinions that he does a poor job of expressing.  IMO, a deranged lunatic is someone who's dangerous to himself and others in society, I don't see Schilling being that guy. That said, I'd gladly have whatever "stain" Schilling has over Davis.  I'd take 26 Ty Cobbs (cue @DrungoHazewood "He wasn't that bad of a guy!  The Al Stump book was lies!") on this team if it meant we would win.
    • No but it was short lived.  He didn’t really become the obvious HOF pitcher (it’s absurd he isn’t in) until his late 20s. Finley was good but you don’t regret losing him or Harnisch.     And let’s not forget, Glenn Davis was really good for several years before we got him.
    • I voted Glenn, but honestly didn't think through SG's point of likely failed development.  I still think its Glenn though.  We could have been a much different team heading into the mid 90s.  The Chris Davis contract shouldn't be as big of a deal as it is.  In modern MLB, you've got to be able to mitigate or fix these mistakes, and be willing to eat all/some of the costs.    While the contract itself was a disaster and a waste (I think most said that at the time), the team should have moved on in any direction at this point but we are a cheap, poorly run franchise who values staying afloat rather than building a competitive team.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...