Jump to content
Rene88

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 Manny's rep is self-inflicted, no need to read more into than that.  A headline which reads "Adam Jones on Manny Machado’s rep as a dirty player: Race is ‘one hundred percent’ a factor" is also a "way to get clicks." 

Quote

What did you make about the reaction to that play with Manny in San Diego, when he dropped his bat near John Ryan Murphy’s feet on that foul pop?

Everyone has an opinion on everybody, except themselves. I didn’t see it initially. I saw it after everything. I don’t know. I really don’t have an opinion on it. Let’s leave it to Twitter! Let’s leave it to all the people who do everything on the book. They live the greatest kosher life possible.

Quote

Fairly or unfairly, he’s gained a reputation as being a dirty player. What’s your reaction to that?

I’ve been with the guy every day in the bigs besides the last six months. I don’t see him as a dirty player. I see him as a player who plays the game hard. I see him as a guy who plays the game his way, also. People label everything. Everyone has an opinion while living the perfect kosher life.

 

Quote

This game long has had a bad history of using specific words to describe white players and other words to describe non-white players. Do you think Manny’s reputation would be different if he were white?

One hundred percent. One hundred percent. One hundred percent. We know that, because some players are called grinders and other players are called something else. Some players are called pouting, other players are called passionate. It’s all about how you word it. My wife’s a lawyer. She told me a long time ago that everything is about how you word it. And how you word it is important. It’s like how you write a headline — most people nowadays see the headline and react off the headline. They don’t care about the thousands of words you guys put into the actual article. They just care about the headline. We just want clicks. I get it. Trust me, it drives money, it’s the market. I completely understand it. It sucks that certain words are used to describe certain players and certain words are used to describe others.

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

 Manny's rep is self-inflicted, no need to read more into than that.  A headline which reads "Adam Jones on Manny Machado’s rep as a dirty player: Race is ‘one hundred percent’ a factor" is also a "way to get clicks." 

 

I don't think the headline was misleading or dishonest. I think it's fair to consider and discuss what role race plays in the rhetoric used to describe minorities in the USA, just as Adam did. He didn't say that Manny is a squeaky clean player, but when asked, he opined that race definitely plays a factor in the rhetoric that gets tossed around. It's not a far-fetched statement to make.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2019 at 7:25 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

If Harold Baines is the new standard they're going to have to induct about 200 players in fairly short order.  There are players (such as Bobby Grich) who have nearly twice Baines' value and fell off the ballot in a year or two and have never been seriously considered in the 20 years since.

There is no standard.  The BBWAA kind of has a loose standard, but the various Committees do whatever the heck they want, no matter how inconsistent with past results.

This is kind of random but I was looking at the list of players Nick Markakis was likely to pass on the all time hit list this year, and one of them was Gary Gaetti.    Career OPS+ of 97 but he managed to stick in the bigs for 20 years and produce 42.1 rWAR.    Won 4 Gold Gloves, too.    Another member of the Hall of the Very Good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/12/2019 at 6:40 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

What hate?  Harold Baines is an awesome guy, and I loved watching him on the O's.  Eastern Shore native.  What's not to like?

But that doesn't change the fact that his career was about 75% as valuable as John Olerud's.  Baines will be looked at in 20 years as a good dude who benefited from yet another bizarre and confused vote of an ill-conceived and obviously biased Veteran's Committee. Unfortunately that's basically how he's looked at today.

Here's an exercise: lay out a convincing case that Baines deserves induction and Keith Hernandez doesn't.  Baines basically didn't play the field the last 15 years of his career.  Hernandez won 11 gold gloves, and that's validated by modern metrics as he's a +117 run fielder.  Baines, mostly not having any fielding responsibility, led the league in slugging once.  That was his only league-leading mark in anything.  Hernandez led the league in runs twice, doubles, walks, batting average, and OBP.  Hernandez had a 128 OPS+, Baines 121. Hernandez played on two World Series champs, Baines none.  Hernandez won an MVP award, Baines never finished higher than 9th.  Hernandez out-WARs Baines 60-38.

Clearly, unambiguously, Hernandez was a vastly superior player.  But he peaked out at 10% of the BBWAA vote and hasn't been able to convince a committee of his value.  Baines peaked out at 6%, but got a committee with a number of his former managers, GMs, and peers to vote him in.

And that's just one example.  There are literally over 200 position players with more than 38 rWAR who are not in the Hall of Fame.

"Hate" was used in the internet slang sense. To me, the fact that Baines was voted in over many players with larger WAR appears to discredit WAR not Baines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/14/2019 at 1:03 AM, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I know Davies was only in the minor league system at the time, but I didn’t like the Parra trade from day one.

 

I always was a Davies fan. At the time, Wright and Wilson were on the team and probably viewed with higher ceilings by DD.  So he was a spare part. 

We would have likely traded him last trade deadline, or we’d be talking about trading him in a few months. You can “butterfly effect” the path of the franchise all you want, but we probably end up back in this same thread in August following him. We’d just be 2 top 30 org prospects richer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

"Hate" was used in the internet slang sense. To me, the fact that Baines was voted in over many players with larger WAR appears to discredit WAR not Baines.

In 5 years on  the hall of fame ballot where the requirement to get into the hall of fame is 75%, Baines' highest showing was 6.1%.

Baines getting in the hall was an example of having friends in the right places. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/12/2019 at 6:00 AM, Frobby said:

For some reason, I find myself rooting against Gausman doing well.    It’s like I don’t want to believe that his so-so performance here was due to poor development and coaching.    It’s stupid, since all those coaches are gone, we have a completely new regime here, and generally I like the Braves.   But I also don’t want to feel like we got badly ripped off in that trade, and the better Gausman does, the worse I’ll feel about that. So I appreciate it when he has a mediocre game like last night’s.  

Meanwhile, at least Darren O’Day is making us look good for dumping his contract.    He’s still shut down with no projected return date.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/fantasy/baseball/news/braves-darren-oday-shut-down/amp/.   But the truth is, I’ve always really liked O’Day and I hope he returns and does well for the Braves.

The thing that gets me with that trade is, at the time the Pirates were looking at both Gausman and Archer. If we could have somehow pried one of Meadows or Glasnow for Gausman, it would have been a great deal for us. Instead, it looks like we moved him to dump salary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, nate22 said:

The thing that gets me with that trade is, at the time the Pirates were looking at both Gausman and Archer. If we could have somehow pried one of Meadows or Glasnow for Gausman, it would have been a great deal for us. Instead, it looks like we moved him to dump salary.

DD was trying to save his job. I’m sure the owners were happy with the $12 million he saved them by unloading O’day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

"Hate" was used in the internet slang sense. To me, the fact that Baines was voted in over many players with larger WAR appears to discredit WAR not Baines.

What it tells me is that having your buddies on a Committee can veto the overwhelming decision of the voters of the BBWAA.  The writers never gave Baines more than 6% of the vote.  That's in line with his value from metrics such as WAR.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Frobby said:

This is kind of random but I was looking at the list of players Nick Markakis was likely to pass on the all time hit list this year, and one of them was Gary Gaetti.    Career OPS+ of 97 but he managed to stick in the bigs for 20 years and produce 42.1 rWAR.    Won 4 Gold Gloves, too.    Another member of the Hall of the Very Good.

Somehow I was watching on TV the day that Gaetti started two around-the-horn triple plays against the Red Sox.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Uli2001 said:

"Hate" was used in the internet slang sense. To me, the fact that Baines was voted in over many players with larger WAR appears to discredit WAR not Baines.

I think that it discredits neither Baines nor WAR, but rather the committee.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, POR said:

In 5 years on  the hall of fame ballot where the requirement to get into the hall of fame is 75%, Baines' highest showing was 6.1%.

Baines getting in the hall was an example of having friends in the right places. 

 

"Don't hate the player, hate the game." Here I go with hate again, sorry. What I mean is there is a reason there is a committee and it's not just the baseball writers' call.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2021 Minor League Depth Chart

2021 Prospect Power Rankings

2020 Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2020 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Great.   They have done a good job of keeping up on things.
    • Is it showing real signs of age and does it need significant repairs? It still looks good on TV, but so doesn’t Fenway and I’ve heard stories about that place.    I ask because even though Camden isn’t ancient, it’s not new anymore. 
    • Man this thread has turned into something. I won't bother quoting everyone but wanted to share a few reactions I had while reading. 1. Matt Boyd 2018-2019 is not a worthy comparison of John Means because John Means is a much better pitcher. Any trade discussion should start from the fact that we would be trading a 28 year old cheap, controllably pitcher who is approaching 350 innings now at nearly LESS than 1.00 WHIP, ERA less than 3.60. And yes the Bedard haul is a reasonable comparison. To hell with the peripherals that don't like him. Watch him pitch. FIP says that John Means and Matt Harvey have been the same pitcher this year. He has excellent control/command with a knack for avoiding hard contact. Why is a .230 BABIP concerning when his career BABIP is .244? So any trade should be valuing him at the nearly top of the rotation talent he has been, and the not the back of the rotation the advanced metrics say he is. If not? Sorry. 2. Let's put to rest any discussion Austin Hays is a platoon player. He's our 2nd best position player. There's no concerning career splits and any O's fan should want him in the outfield everyday.  3. Ryan McKenna has played his role well for a rookie and I've become more fond of him as the season went along. Short sample size but his 11 homers and 7 steals in 27 games at Norfolk were eye opening. He's in excellent shape, hustles, is a fantastic defender, has displayed a good batting eye, and it's way too early to give up on his bat.  4. Regarding Trey Mancini and Anthony Santander's trade value, I'm not sure there is much. We are looking at a 0.9 and 0.3 B-Ref WAR players. Decent bats who have seen better days and don't provide much else. Renato Nunez provided 2.6 WAR and a 107 OPS+ in less than 2 normal seasons and was DFA'd in his first arbitration year. I want both Mancini and Santander back but let's not kid ourselves that we would be getting back a high quality package for these players.  5. I think people tend to gloss over how beneficial it is to have real major league pitchers in the majors while our prospects are developing. I'm all for tanking and not spending everything we have for a 70 win team, but without pitchers like John Means, games turn into exhaustive bullpen games, pitchers get overworked, and your prospects get yanked around or rushed. So Yeah I don't think John Means is not leading us to contention in 2022 but he is still a valuable part of the rebuild. He is not wasted value/talent whatsoever.  6. The "terrible in 2022, .500 team in 2023, and contender in 2024" timelines are pretty ridiculous. Nobody knows when it will all come together. But I do believe success breeds success, and things tend to work out or not work out in clusters. And outside additions will come. We do not have to and will not home grow this entire team. 
    • If I could have placed a bet during the few seconds I saw Means try to advance, I would have been willing to place a considerable sum on his getting hurt while sliding (or not sliding) into third. So I wasn't too distressed about him getting thrown out when he walked away unharmed.  When's the last time an Oriole pitcher was on base twice during a game? I find those on-base moments scary.
    • You might as well just says he's not available then. No one is going to give up that type of payment for a guy who has never pitched a full season, due to repeated arm fatigue, and has his peripherals. Yes, he's obviously underestimated by FIP and xFIP because they don't take into consideration quality of contact much in the way Kyle Hendricks is, but you're also talking about a guy who has posted a 4.26 ERA, 7.32 K/9 since the spider tack crack down on June 15th. There's too much uncertainty floating around him to warrant that kind of package. If  Robert Hassell and a back end of the Padre top 20 was available, I think that would be a really good haul considering those uncertainties. 
    • I'm gonna guess that this hornet's nest will have some who will - "He's a #5 pick"!  "We coulda had "X" at 5!"  "Elias was just being cheap!" .  I'm not upset, however.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...