Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frobby

Forbes: O’s made a $57 mm profit in 2019

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pretty close to what I expected.

Rebuilds always have the side effect of dumping money into the pockets of ownership.

I am fine with the team profiting from payroll cuts during times when the team is bound to be bad/mediocre, so long as they spend In times when it will help their team to contend.    I’m just surprised that non-player expenses aren’t up by, say, $5-10 mm.   The O’s already were dead last on those expenses in 2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I am fine with the team profiting from payroll cuts during times when the team is bound to be bad/mediocre, so long as they spend In times when it will help their team to contend.    I’m just surprised that non-player expenses aren’t up by, say, $5-10 mm.   The O’s already were dead last on those expenses in 2018.

You've read enough of my tin foil hat theories to know that I'm not surprised.  

It is disappointing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I am fine with the team profiting from payroll cuts during times when the team is bound to be bad/mediocre, so long as they spend In times when it will help their team to contend.    I’m just surprised that non-player expenses aren’t up by, say, $5-10 mm.   The O’s already were dead last on those expenses in 2018.

What are non-player expenses?  Like the electric bill, salaries of other employees, cleaning supplies,  etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

What are non-player expenses?  Like the electric bill, salaries of other employees, cleaning supplies,  etc?

We were told it would be Edgertronic high speed cameras.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I guess if you want to put a lot of belief in these numbers, it could be an issue...thats a big if for me though.

Even if you think the numbers are incorrect I think comparing the yearly totals have value.  You have to assume that one year is going to be as accurate as the next.  I don't think they just suddenly missed 5M in spending in 2019.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pretty close to what I expected.

Rebuilds always have the side effect of dumping money into the pockets of ownership.

What is the average ROI on a billion and a half dollar investment, annualized. Equity notwithstanding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Even if you think the numbers are incorrect I think comparing the yearly totals have value.  You have to assume that one year is going to be as accurate as the next.  I don't think they just suddenly missed 5M in spending in 2019.

If you think Elias came in and didn’t spend a lot more money on the infrastructure than they did before him, I don’t know what to tell you.

We really have no idea what’s reported, what’s not, how the organization could break off some of these costs, etc...

It’s very possible that some things are done under a different corporate name..I mean, we know the Os don’t count the MASN revenue with their revenue.  They view them as separate entities.  
 

I just don’t put much weight into these numbers.

Heres what I know..the team can sustain a budget a payroll of 130-160m while also spending what is needed in the draft, international signings and proper infrastructure for development, etc...

As long as they do that (the payroll will go back up, I’m not concerned about that right now), I don’t care if they make a billion dollars a year.

The issue, for me, comes when they try to cry woe is me and have to dump a player over a few million or something like that.  They should take on contracts to “buy prospects” and things like that.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Frobby said:

To me the most interesting line above is the last one: non-player expenses basically flat.*    If we thought that a good bit of the money saved on payroll last year was going to be plowed into infrastructure, hi tech equipment, upgrading facilities etc., it appears we thought wrong.    Looks like the savings went straight to the owners’ bottom line.     I have to admit, that surprises me.    I do think we spent a good bit on that stuff, but apparently that money came from cuts in other types of non-payroll expenses.

* The non-player expenses are not explicitly published by Forbes.   I calculated them as follows: 
Revenue - Net Income - Player Expenses = Non-Player Expenses.

 

I would like to know how Forbes comes up with that number.  I don't think there are any publicly available sources for that, so they either have to have inside sources with each team or the league, or they're guessing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I am fine with the team profiting from payroll cuts during times when the team is bound to be bad/mediocre, so long as they spend In times when it will help their team to contend.    I’m just surprised that non-player expenses aren’t up by, say, $5-10 mm.   The O’s already were dead last on those expenses in 2018.

Don't the Orioles owe the Nationals $99 million based on the results of the MASN lawsuit? Maybe they're trying to pocket as much money as possible in order to make those payments in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ScGO's said:

What are non-player expenses?  Like the electric bill, salaries of other employees, cleaning supplies,  etc?

Yes.  The IT department.  The cleaning people.  Rent.  Facility maintenance.  The analytics department.  If the Orioles employ 300 people (besides players) at an average loaded salary of 100k that's $30M.

From a recent post on Bill James' site, with the question being something like "what looks different from the inside of a MLB organization since you worked for the Red Sox":

Quote

There are many things that look tremendously different from the inside.   I suppose I would have to write a book to explain them all, but, for example:

The number one thing that you learn, from working inside the game, is how many people contribute to a championship.  It's just an unimaginable number.  Scouts. . .and it doesn't really start with scouts, but somebody has to see the player, on behalf of the organization, and say that he could be really good.  There somebody else has to see him again, and confirm that or bat it down; before you draft a player you look at him 50 times and talk to 50 people who have known him and go into his house and meet his parents, and then you put all of that information together before you make a decision; probably 50 people involved in that process.   Then he goes to the minors; he's got a dozen minor league pitching coaches or batting coaches or whatever, minor league managers.  Trainers.  Spring training coaches.  Equipment managers.   The system doesn't work unless all of those people do their jobs.
 
Then you have the people who sell tickets, the people who create business partnerships.  The GM, the 30 guys in the front office other than the scouts.  The previous GM, before the current one.   The people who take care of the field.   You can believe it or not, but the system will not work unless ALL of those people do their best to make it work.   And I've hardly scratched the surface.   The medical people. . .the doctors who perform the surgeries, the guy who knows what surgeon to go to for what surgery, the guy who drives them to their medical appointment and knows how to get them in there and out of there.   The nutritionist who tries to treat them about what to eat.  The people who know what exercise equipment to have.
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

 

Don't the Orioles owe the Nationals $99 million based on the results of the MASN lawsuit? Maybe they're trying to pocket as much money as possible in order to make those payments in the future.

It’s MASN that owes the money, not the Orioles.   But I forget right now if MASN overdistributed to the Orioles based on the old formula and will have to claw it back, or whether MASN was sitting on the money, or a little of both.   

Edit: went back to a MASN thread I started last December that reported that the O’s were over distributed about $69.6 mm that would have to be paid back to MASN if the award is not overturned on appeal.   I’ve looked for information on the status of the appeal and found nothing helpful.    It looks like the case is on some kind of calendar call for Oct. 1, but I can’t tell what it is.   
 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • o   You better take a diamond ring ...... you better pawn it, babe.   o
    • The write up makes me think that he is not a starter that Hyde would want to rely on every 5th day.  Maybe more of a swingman.  So that makes it more likely the O's sign a Milone type to begin the season or maybe Milone himself if they can get him for a million for one year.
    • o   That's somewhat of a rare song in which Lennon and Harrison switched on and off for the lead and rhythm. Lennon essentially plays lead for the majority of the song, while Harrison strums the chords. Then for the lead guitar solo it's Harrison playing lead, while Lennon briefly strums the chords. Then at the end of the solo, Lennon goes back to (essentially) playing lead while Harrison strums the chords.   Somewhat similarly, in the song "I'm Happy Just to Dance with You" it's Lennon playing the dominant portion of the guitar (strumming/picking extremely fast) while Harrison strums the chords ...... the difference being that unlike the case with "All My Loving", there is no guitar solo in "I'm Happy Just to Dance with You."   o
    • Brian Kenny on with Russo just now had the observation Cash let his starter go past 18 Batters Faced 5 of the first 6 games.   Obviously a 1-0 score and all the big relievers "rested" in an elimination game different circumstances last night. Mad Dog was ready for blood, but Kenny sort of headed him off at the pass surprising by giving his agreement the Snell pull was incorrect. Given the scuffles of the 4-week postseason, I'm not sure sticking with Anderson as the A reliever did him any favors.  His stat producing robot mode was clearly offline (today the inevitable reports acknowledging fatigue a factor).  Fairbanks or Castillo probably would have been better picks last night for in-inning fireman. Kenny in the spot also had the Mad Dog (pining for Snell to have the Smoltz experience) counter the Dodgers did October with a 2-man rotation, and bullpenning to take the WS clincher and survive two NLCS elimination games.  Obviously in the 162, Urias and May take their turns and do fine, but the October Corbin blueprint got drawn a bit more heavily this year. Snell is kind of an interesting gray area of is he a good enough starter to transcend the 18-batter leash as is correctly done with Cole, etc.  He has the Cy, but also like a 3.50-ish expected ERA across the couple of years including the Cy.   I think the Rays see him more JA Happ than Clayton Kershaw.
    • Really can't wait to see when some of the international guys are starting to make noise.  It's good that we've got a decently regarded system without much presence from international prospects but the system will have a real shot in the arm once a few of these guys start to produce.
    • He's really an unknown because of the bat improvements he showed early on the year are for real, he's a steal as a 3rd round pick.
    • Not sure why but I have a good feeling about him.  Maybe it's the plate discipline.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...