Jump to content
Frobby

Serious question: could Means become a TOR starter?

Recommended Posts

Watching Means these last few games, there’s little he doesn’t have in his repertoire now.    His fastball was consistently 95 mph, with good riding action.    He’s reacquired his changeup that we saw all last year.    And his curve ball is now becoming a weapon.   The slider is still a work in progress, and he hung one tonight that cost him for a homer.    It was his only real mistake all night.   

So my question is, is this former fringe prospect becoming a top of rotation starter before our eyes?    I realize his overall numbers this year were just so-so, but he’s been damned impressive down the stretch.    I’m really intrigued by what he might do next year.  
 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Watching Means these last few games, there’s little he doesn’t have in his repertoire now.    His fastball was consistently 95 mph, with good riding action.    He’s reacquired his changeup that we saw all last year.    And his curve ball is now becoming a weapon.   The slider is still a work in progress, and he hung one tonight that cost him for a homer.    It was his only real mistake all night.   

So my question is, is this former fringe prospect becoming a top of rotation starter before our eyes?    I realize his overall numbers this year were just so-so, but he’s been damned impressive down the stretch.    I’m really intrigued by what he might do next year.  
 

i am hoping that is the case with Means.  I also like that he is a LHP.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really, the biggest problem he had this year was gopher balls.    He’s a fly ball pitcher, so that’s probably inevitable to a degree, but 12 in 43.2 innings (2.47 per 9 IP) is not TOR material.   In these excellent four last starts, he allowed one run in each game and all four runs came on solo homers.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two issues I see for Means.

He seems to get dinged up, he's missed time in both 2019 and 2020 with minor injuries.  You generally consider a TOR guy to be durable.

He doesn't go deep enough into games.    This is 2020 I'm not expecting him to throw a dozen complete games but a TOR guy needs to eat some innings and Means hasn't shown that yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cherry pick leaderboard, custom with 9/3 start date to exclude the last bad Mets start before "the Talk":

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=al&qual=y&type=1&season=2020&month=1000&season1=2020&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=2020-09-03&enddate=2020-09-30&sort=9%2Cd

I would have said AL Pitcher of Month candidate, but Cole has been Cole, and apparently Chris Bassitt has a 0.34 ERA this month.  (I still think the A's might not use him next week).

I suspect he'll progress from being like a $5 pitcher to like a $12 pitcher in the LABRs/Touts of the world, as a proxy for how gamers value his expected future superficial stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Two issues I see for Means.

He seems to get dinged up, he's missed time in both 2019 and 2020 with minor injuries.  You generally consider a TOR guy to be durable.

He doesn't go deep enough into games.    This is 2020 I'm not expecting him to throw a dozen complete games but a TOR guy needs to eat some innings and Means hasn't shown that yet.

Too soon to know about the first issue.  His minor league track record was very good: 27, 27, 26 and 28 starts in a MiL environment where 28 is basically the max over a 140 game season.    

I take your point about getting deep into games.   I was watching in the 6th, Means still working on a no hitter at the time and Garceau mentioned he was at 93 pitches.    How does your pitch count get that high when you’ve allowed one baserunner and still working in the 6th?   Still, TOR innings per start seems to be a moving target these days.  I count 8 pitchers this year who’ve made 10 starts and thrown 6+ innings per start.   There’s only 18 pitchers in MLB who qualify for the ERA title!  (That does not include innings from yesterday or the upcoming games today, so that number will increase, but still...)
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the gopheritis, Means is 13th out of 110 in HR/FB among SP with 40 IP.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=40&type=8&season=2020&month=0&season1=2020&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=2020-01-01&enddate=2020-12-31&sort=15,d

To some extent HR/FB is a "luck" outcome - analysts will probably look to his WHIP more than his ERA getting stoked for his 2021.

As he's found his game this month, I also think he's set his Yield HR or BB? setting all the way to HR.  He's enjoying his progress and probably not suffering fools in the batters box.

He's safely fended off the (light) Kremer/Akin challenge for the Opening Day assignment.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Too soon to know about the first issue.  His minor league track record was very good: 27, 27, 26 and 28 starts in a MiL environment where 28 is basically the max over a 140 game season.    

I take your point about getting deep into games.   I was watching in the 6th, Means still working on a no hitter at the time and Garceau mentioned he was at 93 pitches.    How does your pitch count get that high when you’ve allowed one baserunner and still working in the 6th?   Still, TOR innings per start seems to be a moving target these days.  I count 8 pitchers this year who’ve made 10 starts and thrown 6+ innings per start.   There’s only 18 pitchers in MLB who qualify for the ERA title!  (That does not include innings from yesterday or the upcoming games today, so that number will increase, but still...)
 

He didn't exceed six innings pitched in any start this year.  Last season he pitched seven five times.  He never exceeded seven.

The demands on a TOR guy are not what they once were but I think the occasional eight or even nine inning start is still expected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The potential is certainly there. Arguably he already is TOR in that he is literally our top starter right now and would likely get the opening day start April 2021. 

Despite the higher ERA, he had a lower walk rate, higher K rate, and lower WHIP this year. That bodes very well. 

Interestingly, he had traditional splits last year, slight reverse split this year in small sample size. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Frobby said:

Watching Means these last few games, there’s little he doesn’t have in his repertoire now.    His fastball was consistently 95 mph, with good riding action.    He’s reacquired his changeup that we saw all last year.    And his curve ball is now becoming a weapon.   The slider is still a work in progress, and he hung one tonight that cost him for a homer.    It was his only real mistake all night.   

So my question is, is this former fringe prospect becoming a top of rotation starter before our eyes?    I realize his overall numbers this year were just so-so, but he’s been damned impressive down the stretch.    I’m really intrigued by what he might do next year.  
 

The only overall number that was so-so was his ERA. He had a sub-1.00 WHIP, a substantially better K/9 than last year (8.7 Vs. 7.0), and an elite K/BB (6.00). Even his ground ball rate is substantially up this year with both LD and FB Percentages declining vs. 2019. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

The only overall number that was so-so was his ERA. He had a sub-1.00 WHIP, a substantially better K/9 than last year (8.7 Vs. 7.0), and an elite K/BB (6.00). Even his ground ball rate is substantially up this year with both LD and FB Percentages declining vs. 2019. 

His FIP was 5.59 and his xFIP was 4.45.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to look at it closer but I suspect that one of the reasons Means does not go deeper in games is the defense costs him.  Errors, plays not made, poor framing that does not get a strike.  It would be nice to have a catcher that can catch a ball in the dirt instead of it going to the backstop.

I also don't think the increase in velocity has been much of a factor in his last 4 games.  He backed off the velo in favor of better command.

The Means of the last 4 games is a TOR.  4 solo homers in not going to hurt him.    He will have to find a way to stop having mid season slumps.   But John is a worker and he knows that he needs to improve that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 125 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

Orioles Information


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores
News

Tony's Takes

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2018 End of Season Top 30 Prospects List

Prospect Scouting Reports

Statistics

2019 Orioles Stats

2019 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats






  • Posts

    • Clearly I am failing to get my point across. I'm tired. Have any opinion you want. At the end of the day, you have an opinion, I have facts. My facts state that Elias has dumped one player that became an impact player and he has not acquired any. Does that mean he will never acquire any? No.  Does it mean he missed something of that the technology may not always have the answers, incomplete. I like a lot of what Elias has done in changing things within the organization, but so far his talent evaluations of players he's brought in have not been very good. Grant it, these guys are waiver claims and few of them will turn into anything, but so far he's found middle/long relievers and utility guys or sub par guys they've run out as starters the last two years. I expect things to improve, but what we don't know yet is whether he will be given a budget to help improve the team in the future. Afterall, if they are really making coaching moves based on salary (I still don't believe this) then you can throw away any chances of the team being competitive soon so he will need to build completely from within. My hope was that Elias had the technological and scouting eye to find unearthed talent in other organizations. Instead, he failed to pick up Yaz's potential and the guys he has selected have not shown they are part of a winning future.  Sure, maybe we can give him a pass on Yaz, but he also hired the coaches yet the SF coaches in less then a few weeks found a way to make Yaz an impact player. The man at the top gets credit when things go well, but also must take the blame when they don't.  
    • I know Elias wants to know if he missed something in his evaluation, sure. Why wouldn't he. But I doubt he is losing sleep over this. Yaz was traded on March 23, 2019. At that time, he was a 28 year old OF with average speed, maybe an average arm, below average power for a corner OF that does not play CF. He's 5-10 178 lbs. and was no longer a prospect. He was slowed by injuries, often playing dinged up. Dan Duquette alluded to his injuries in an interview that I saw and stated he had struggled with his progression. He had never really excelled in AAA. He was behind Austin Hays, Yusniel Diaz, Anthony Santander, Ryan McKenna, Cedric Mullins and DJ Stewart for playing time in AA/AAA OF playing time. No one knew that several of these players would struggle with injuries and inconsistency, but they were all much more highly regarded prospects than Yaz. At that time, the only AAA OF he was more highly regarded than was Jaycob Brugman, and he was absolutely terrible. Elias decided to cut bait so that actual prospects could play meaningful innings and get the developmental at bats. No other team even thought so much of him as to take him in the rule 5 draft. Did the Giants know something? No, they just got lucky that this one panned out. They had no idea he would do what he has done, no way.  As far as the technology, it isn't something that will diagnose and fix every swing. It gives you lots of data, and it takes time, more than a few weeks, to work through any changes/adjustments needed. Obviously, Elias and his staff were not impressed with what they saw compared to the other guys. Then, Yaz was traded and something changed over the next few months in AAA for him. Great for him. Maybe he started to make good changes from what he learned from the Elias staff, but it took time to begin to show in games. That is often the case with swing changes, approach adjustments. Maybe it was the Giants who found something. Maybe it was something else, who knows.  Was he going to be the same player in Baltimore, facing the AL East? IDK, I would guess likely not. There have been many examples over they years of players who had impact careers out West and got traded to an Eastern team, only to struggle. Would it have been nice to see him do that here in Baltimore, of course. I just don't see why this has become such a hotly contested thing. Hindsight is easy to see clearly. His tools have never indicated this kind of production. There is not one prospect report that says he would do anything like he is doing.  I know you are pretty positive about Elias and Sig. To point to Elias's failure to produce waiver wire pick ups and minor trades into an impact player is incomplete, honestly, in COVID 2020 crazy season. He has no money to spend, and yet most of the ML team was picked up off waivers and minor league free agency and still competed on most nights. The final record looks worse than it was. I would say his record was excellent in the first half. Santander got hurt and many young players struggled badly. Solid approaches went out the window entirely.  Pedro Severino had an OPS north of .850 in July/August and he began to look like an all star (offensively), but he chased much more in September and his numbers faded badly to .250/.322/.388/.710 Jose Iglesias was an impact signing, despite the injuries and many at bats in the DH role .373/.400/.556/.956 Hanser Alberto is what he is a well below-average defender with little power, and he faded badly in September as well .283/.306/.393/.698 Pat Valaika was very good, I thought, for what his role is. .277/.315/.475/.791 Rio Ruiz is probably not the answer at 3B, but I think he gets one more year to see if he can figure it out .222/.286/.427/.713 Richie Martin will be vastly improved, he reported so much stronger than in 2019 and I think his injury robbed him of a breakout of sorts, the swing looked so much more fluid and quick in Spring camp. Ramon Urias might just make Alberto expendable, and I believe he will hit and produce better overall numbers and play better defense. Obviously, Dwight Smith Jr. was a failure. Early in 2019, he certainly looked like he was a certain upgrade to Yaz. The the injuries in late May, neck and shoulder. He has not been the same since. Most of the resources have gone into minor league and international infrastructure. To criticize Elias for the Yaz trade in hindsight, honestly it's silly. No one batted an eye at the time of the deal. Can we just be happy for the guy and not look for someone to blame? If there is a pattern here, then ok, there's a problem. This one baffles everyone because no one saw this coming. And where would Yaz play in our OF next season? Over Mountcastle, Santander, Hays, Mullins, Mancini...? 
    • Who are the #23 and #24 Prospects?
    • https://www.orioleshangout.com/2020/10/25/20-2020-prospect-kyle-bradish-rhp/
    • Back to the Snell/Fairbanks/Anderson/Castillo even numbered game quartet to try and set up Buehler (and Kershaw?) v. The World Wednesday night. The Dodgers have clearly dented the relief aces, but I don't look for any process change in Game 6. This feels like it should be over 4-1 but for the gods putting their thumbs on the scale last night - an excellent bonus baseball gift.
    • You a few others really are missing my point. I'm done trying to make it. Read what I wrote in other posts.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...